Videos of Acoustically-Coupled Audio Recordings

I don't think these recordings are that great, a good mic isn't everything it seems.

Keep in mind that they are recordings in an audio show, so they are not optimal but they are, IMO, much more interesting than iphone recordings which basically make everything sound the same (slight exaggeration). With higher quality microphones (and recorders) the strengths and weaknesses of the systems/rooms are obvious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morricab
Some of it sounds bad probably because the speakers and/or the room sound bad! Take the AudioNote/Kondo room playing the Art Pepper track. Colored sound, saxophone sounds nasal, the whole thing is muddy.... At the opposite spectrum B&M is thin and shouty. Devote Fidelity is a similar type of sound to AudioNote. Wilson Audio's Take Five totally lacks finesse... Etc...
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeterA
Keep in mind that they are recordings in an audio show, so they are not optimal but they are, IMO, much more interesting than iphone recordings which basically make everything sound the same (slight exaggeration). With higher quality microphones (and recorders) the strengths and weaknesses of the systems/rooms are obvious.

they don’t sound the same at all. quite different. when I covered the 2019 show with my phone people pretty much provided the same feedback I thought in the room. That is what converted me over to videos. That was the first.

i did take more than one video of a room, from the centre seat, often playing classical. In fact, three different rooms had the same track recorded.

so, it is just not videos with phone or mic, but if you take a video from one side of the room, playing poor music, it is going to sound poor. The track you record, length of time you record, enough to give the attributes and the musical message, all matters and a phone is sufficient. I heard sophisticated mic videos of those rooms and they made many or rooms sound great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtemur and PeterA
they don’t sound the same at all. quite different. when I covered the 2019 show with my phone people pretty much provided the same feedback I thought in the room. That is what converted me over to videos. That was the first.

i did take more than one video of a room, from the centre seat, often playing classical. In fact, three different rooms had the same track recorded.

so, it is just not videos with phone or mic, but if you take a video from one side of the room, playing poor music, it is going to sound poor. The track you record, length of time you record, enough to give the attributes and the musical message, all matters and a phone is sufficient. I heard sophisticated mic videos of those rooms and they made many or rooms sound great.

Well,to give an example, everything Thundersnow posted sound the same to my ears!

Good mics don't make the room sound great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeterA
older phone, but rooms don’t sound same


Of course rooms don't sound the same, that was my point.

Vis a vis your video, they are better, but there is still has a "sameness" to it, a little thin sounding, and very far from the TotalDac videos' sound quality. Sorry...

The mic position changes the sound, but I'll take a studio quality mic in a lesser position anytime over an iphone in the sweet spot.
 
Of course rooms don't sound the same, that was my point.

Vis a vis your video, they are better, but there is still has a "sameness" to it, a little thin sounding, and very far from the TotalDac videos' sound quality. Sorry...

The mic position changes the sound, but I'll take a studio quality mic in a lesser position anytime over an iphone in the sweet spot.

oh I totally agree it is far sonically from Total Dac quality. That’s not the point. The point is you can use either to evaluate we equally

if you want to create a playlist where you play good sounding music over YouTube, you need total dac quality recording. To evaluate, both are equally fine. And don’t buy on either, just use them as a guide to shortlist.

in fact too good sounding videos do not help me evaluate. They are sonically all pleasing to listen to, unlike in the room
 
in fact too good sounding videos do not help me evaluate. They are sonically all pleasing to listen to, unlike in the room

I think you are confusing the sound quality of the recording and our evaluation of the system recorded

I pointed out how the TotalDAC recording was much more revealing and led me to conclude that few systems were pleasing. So I would definitely not say that better quality recording equipment makes everything sound good. It may in fact be the opposite sometimes.

Anyway, we can agree to disagree! I was happy to find the TotalDac videos. I'm not going to be purchasing anything based on those, they just satisfy my curiosity more than any iphone recording probably would.
 
Hey I loved the total dac videos. But I would be happy evaluating on phone videos as everyone has one. That said, if people who are not uploading videos on phone today want to with a mic, most welcome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hopkins
This youtuber uses a Samsung S20 I believe, which does seem able to give an idea as to whether a system can deliver emotionally or not:

I don't know about "emotion"... That is not what I am looking for on a YouTube video.

This YouTuber provides good information in his comments. I liked his enthusiasm for the baffleless IO Design speakers.The quality of the video is decent. You can get a good idea of the difference with a typical boxed speaker...

 
Last edited:
I received the Shure MV88. Which settings do people apply for recording the sound coming out of two speakers of a stereo system?

IMG_5958.jpeg
 
I received the Shure MV88. Which settings do people apply for recording the sound coming out of two speakers of a stereo system?
1684724558015.png
Don't know about others but this is the most natural / musical setting that I'm aware of. I also set the gain to either 24db or 25.5db and then blast away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott Naylor
Thank you!
 
I wish you succes, hopkins
But calling these units full range or a design in which these are used full range , is misinformation.
Interesting. I just read somewhere the other day a phrase that goes something like this...

"There is no such thing as disinformation, misinformation, etc. It's all just information and it's up to you and your critical thinking to discern whether or not the informaiton has value."

Or something like that. Regardless, I think there's potential value to that. :)

Its an insult to people who design products/ spend a lot of money on designs that really cover the 20 -20 khz spectrum fully / audibly .
(-3 db roll off max )
Regardless of the designer, speaker designs are open to criticism as much as anything else, right?

By the way where is another organ vid on this thread ( members system vid ??)

...
I've posted several a few months back in the oomph, menacing thread. Actually, I think a more fun challenge is our desire for our playback presentations to more fully engulf / capture our attention. Almost like achieving a level of enjoyment such that we've no choice but to subconsciously stop trying to listen analytically and just allow ourselves to be more completely immersed by what we hear.

I think this piece gives a pretty good glimpse of what I'm trying to describe. Of course, as with any playback presentaiton the listener should give the video enough juice so that it at least begins to approach the perceived live performance volume level. Otherwise there can't be much of a challenge to anything, can there? IOW, give it some juice or why bother?
 
Last edited:
Sure why not call all speaker systems full range as to not exclude any of them.
You could. But such a claim would probably be labeled as misinformation if not downright disinformation. Well..., if you still believe in such things. ;)
 
A speaker with a single driver (or multiple identical drivers) is using that single driver to cover the full range of the speaker. End of story.
A full range speaker, should be er full range.
Full range drivers are not usually full range.
 
Last edited:

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing