Problems with believability in audio

Compression is a much bigger problem than most designers will acknowledge. It happens at surprisingly low SPL, especially with lower sensitivity drivers and lossy crossovers.

Crossovers have a big impact on dispersion pattern of the drivers. Ever heard of lobbing?

I agree that compression and radiation pattern will both impact believability significantly and harmonic distortion from the speaker not so much. Earl Geddes did not think that harmonic distortion of compression drivers had any significant impact on perceived sound quality. He felt the horn itself was a much bigger barrier, which is why he came up with his oblate spheroid waveguide/horn to prevent HOMs (High order modes) that cause problems in a lot of other horn types.
Can you elaborate on your definition of compression please?
 
I haven’t heard a multichannel setup that was in anyway more convincing…not saying it isn’t possible but to date every demo has sounded rather contrived.

MCH with MCH CDs or blurays sounds much better than 2ch digital and quite consistently. Only good analog with good LPs, and the very few stereo set ups I like keep me interested in stereo. Otherwise, I would go MCH, with or without processor, over digital regular hifi
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Rubinson
MCH with MCH CDs or blurays sounds much better than 2ch digital and quite consistently. Only good analog with good LPs, and the very few stereo set ups I like keep me interested in stereo. Otherwise, I would go MCH, with or without processor, over digital regular hifi
Ok, all I can say is that the many multi channel demos I have heard didn’t feel more real…they in fact felt more artificial…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rexp
Ok, all I can say is that the many multi channel demos I have heard didn’t feel more real…they in fact felt more artificial…

Did you hear them with MCH music, and did they have 5 speakers without processor, or many speakers with Auro 3D/Atmos
 
MCH with MCH CDs or blurays sounds much better than 2ch digital and quite consistently. Only good analog with good LPs, and the very few stereo set ups I like keep me interested in stereo. Otherwise, I would go MCH, with or without processor, over digital regular hifi
AFAIK, the MCH or blurays carry also a 2CH which is superior to typically 2CH only productions.
 
Stereo sound from 5 speakers equidistant won't give you a feeling of live music, which would never sound like that.

It sounds better than digital into wilson magico etc. I think whether MCH is more like live or 2 CH with front imaging sounds like live has long been debated, no need to revisit that.
 
It sounds better than digital into wilson magico etc. I think whether MCH is more like live or 2 CH with front imaging sounds like live has long been debated, no need to revisit that.
Doesn't that depend on what kind of speakers the 5ch are and what amps are driving them? What if it is 5 ch of Wilson or Magico? Is that better or worse than 2 ch of the same?

When performers are in front of you, the last thing I want is the feeling that they are now singing or playing from behind me.
 
Doesn't that depend on what kind of speakers the 5ch are and what amps are driving them? What if it is 5 ch of Wilson or Magico? Is that better or worse than 2 ch of the same?
Yes I have heard with B&W, another panel speakers that go on the wall whose name escapes me at the mo for some reason - starts with W- those were with processors, Vivid Giyas without. Kal Rubinson is using B&W without processor I believe.

When performers are in front of you, the last thing I want is the feeling that they are now singing or playing from behind me.

That's not how MCH works - rear channels have ambient info, not same info as front channels.
 
Last edited:
Yes I have heard with B&W, another panel speakers that go on the wall whose name escapes me at the mo for some reason - starts with W- those were with processors, Vivid Giyas without. Kal Rubinson is using B&W without processor I believe.



That's now how MCH works - rear channels have ambient info, not same info as front channels.
If you don't have a processor then how are you directing only ambient info into the rear channels?? Doesn't make sense. You HAVE to have a disc with the encoding AND the processor to steer which sound goes where...otherwise you will get instruments and singers all around you.
 
Yes I have heard with B&W, another panel speakers that go on the wall whose name escapes me at the mo for some reason - starts with W- those were with processors, Vivid Giyas without. Kal Rubinson is using B&W without processor I believe.



That's now how MCH works - rear channels have ambient info, not same info as front channels.
Probably Wisdom Audio was the W you couldn't recall...
 
Probably Wisdom Audio was the W you couldn't recall...

Ah yes Wisdom. The MCH was quite nice and they are or were quite used in MCH set ups in the UK
 
If you don't have a processor then how are you directing only ambient info into the rear channels?? Doesn't make sense. You HAVE to have a disc with the encoding AND the processor to steer which sound goes where...
To clarify - by processing I meant something like Auro 3d/Atmos which processes more than the 5 channels. Even without a processor like those, a multichannnel preamp is required, but is taking 5 channel source into 5 channel pre into 5 amps, or a multichannel dac like exasound.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andromedaaudio
Sansui quadrophonie preamp + 4 quad 2 tube mono amps and four cornerhorns klipsch
sounded impressively realistic back then, if you had phase 4 recorded LP as sourcesansui-qs-1-preamplificatore-quadrifonico.jpg
 
To clarify - by processing I meant something like Auro 3d/Atmos which processes more than the 5 channels. Even without a processor like those, a multichannnel preamp is required, but is taking 5 channel source into 5 channel pre into 5 amps, or a multichannel dac like exasound.
Ok, then there is still a processor in the multichannel DVD player...nevertheless there is always a processor...
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonzo75
I mentioned a single speaker, only because my other was not matched and sounded different. As for the recordings (which don't have to be a "solo voice"), you are wrong, because you don't take into account how microphones work (they are not omni-directional...). If I followed your logic, i would never listen to single microphone recordings. It would be a shame...
They can be omnidirectional but, even when not, they cannot fail to capture aspects of the recorded space.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing