Objectivist or Subjectivist? Give Me a Break

Hello Micro

Thanks for your explanation. There are a few points I don't quite understand. (...)

Rob,

In my auditions I always assume the worst case - that the recording has peak level at 0 dB. Most probably this will not happen, but I can be sure I will not have voltage clipping.
 
I keep getting the feeling you have some lawyers jokes just dyiong to get out. Thanks for excersing restraint.

Actually, I have as much respect for lawyers as for doctors and any other professionals. I object when some people characterize all lawyers as corrupt or ambulance chasers etc. Sure there are bad ones, but there are bad doctors, bad traffic planners, bad cops, and so forth.

That said, I still think your grasp of logic is suspect, whether intentional or not. :D

--Ethan
 
i dont know who tomOlex is but i dont remember saying either of those things!!

tomOlex-I hate when that happens! Sorry.
Originally Posted by tomelex
i dont know who tomOlex is but i dont remember saying either of those things!!
It didn't sound like you...

Tim

Let's see . there were two links prvided in post # 849 http://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2011/05/...ve-debate.html on topic: and post #852 http://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs...-?cid=EDNToday . One was posted by "tomOlex" and the other by DonH50. Both had similar content. This quote was taken from Dons'link:
Needless to say, most people making this claim - including "The Audiophiliac" - have little or no technical background. So it's not surprising to see similar such comments in his latest article, including "measurements have little to do with the sound of music" and "the real goal of a hi-fi is to play music and not test tones."
Of course such "audiofool" [emphasis supplied]notions are easily refuted. And the author is certainly entitled to his opinion that the best path to achieving "good sound" is through subjective evaluation and the use of less-than-accurate audio reproduction equipment. But wait, there's more.
Consequently neither member originated the quote. But they appeared to me to endorse it. (meaning the two articles and content.) Don has already disavowed such endorsement . It seems Tom s also. Fair enough.
greg
 
That said, I still think your grasp of logic is suspect, whether intentional or not.

--Ethan

Take your blinders off. You might see more clearly. I find your positions to be agenda driven.
gregadd
 
Take your blinders off. You might see more clearly. I find your positions to be agenda driven.
gregadd

Hey guys...lighten up. It's just a hobby. Lawyer jokes? I've got a million of 'em. Lawyers in the family will do that.

Tim
 
BACK TO ACCOUNTABILITY: If Michael Fremer can go around recommending $60,000 gear based on his listening abilities, some might reasonably want proof he’s qualified. And being a good sport, Mr Fremer broke rank and participated in at least a few blind listening tests. The result was a rather mixed bag and at least one included lots of hand waving. Not surprisingly, few want to follow in his footsteps. Today it’s even more difficult to find listeners with a public reputation willing to participate in a blind test. The same people who publish hearing “immediate and obvious” differences in everything from cables to power conditioners typically make all sorts of questionable excuses when asked to do so with brown bags or bed sheets concealing the gear. Personally, I suspect Fremer probably can hear things 99% of the population would have trouble hearing. If anything, he’s a “ringer” for the subjectivists and I have genuine respect for his listening abilities. So it’s especially a shame he, and other skilled critics like him, won’t participate in more blind tests.
http://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2011/05/...ve-debate.html on topic:


No doubt Fremer is a hero of the subjectivist camp. He certainly is my hero. He's not afraid to to take on the so called experts. His success is the subject of repeated challenges. So much so he has been dubbed the "lucky coin "or "ringer" as stated above. Of course we all know the challlenger always wants a shot (or rematch if he's been previously defeated by the champ) at the title..
For this "fact" filled aricle what does "the results were a mixed bag" mean"?... "at least a few blind listening tests" . Just how many is that? Objectivists claim that these products and assoiciated claims represent anything from 'snake oil to outright fraud. If Mr. Fremer can hear them then the inescapapble conclusion is they do in fact exist. There relative importance and value to audiophiles may remain a matter for debates. No doubt that explains the new arguments of "masking effect",etc. You know, it may exist but you can't hear it. If it may exist does not Mr. Fremer et al deserve an apology? At the very least against the claims of "Snake oil" and fraud. Don't hold your breath.
 
http://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2011/05/...ve-debate.html on topic:


No doubt Fremer is a hero of the subjectivist camp. He certainly is my hero. He's not afraid to to take on the so called experts. His success is the subject of repeated challenges. So much so he has been dubbed the "lucky coin "or "ringer" as stated above. Of course we all know the challlenger always wants a shot (or rematch if he's been previously defeated by the champ) at the title..
For this "fact" filled aricle what does "the results were a mixed bag" mean"?... "at least a few blind listening tests" . Just how many is that? Objectivists claim that these products and assoiciated claims represent anything from 'snake oil to outright fraud. If Mr. Fremer can hear them then the inescapapble conclusion is they do in fact exist. There relative importance and value to audiophiles may remain a matter for debates. No doubt that explains the new arguments of "masking effect",etc. You know, it may exist but you can't hear it. If it may exist does not Mr. Fremer et al deserve an apology? At the very least against the claims of "Snake oil" and fraud. Don't hold your breath.

How many times did Fremer ID what, out of how many tries? Inescapable conclusion...those are two really big words, begging really serious standards. Ad who accused Fremer of fraud? I'm not holding my breath either. Personally, what I usually accuse guys like Fremer of is hyperbole, and you're currently indulging very deeply in it. "Fraud," I typically like to save for things like demagnetizing CDs. Has Fremer differentiated that in a blind test?

Tim
 
---Michael Fremer is just an audio reviewer with a turntable (or two) and a bunch of LPs. :b

...Lots of LPs! ...And he's a comedian too, or was, or still is, but not as a living, I think.
 
"Fraud," I typically like to save for things like demagnetizing CDs. Has Fremer differentiated that in a blind test?

Tim

Tim,

Perhaps Greg should write us a standard disclaimer we put in our post signature every time we recommend something. Fraud is really a severe accusation. :(
 
Tim,

Perhaps Greg should write us a standard disclaimer we put in our post signature every time we recommend something. Fraud is really a severe accusation. :(

That would be a fun exercise for the lawyers here. Perhaps it could read:

"The opinions expressed here are just that, 'opinions.' They are based on my experience, and where indicated, whatever tests I have specifically described in the accompanying text. My views should not be taken as a personal endorsement or guarantee that you will experience the same results, or come to the same conclusions that I have. I have not been offered or received any form of consideration from the manufacturer or supplier of the equipment in question, and where I do take advantage of an 'industry accomodation' price, it is because I like that particular piece of equipment well enough to buy it for myself, nothing more."

Of course, you could turn this into a silly disclaimer:

"As may be obvious, I have no clue as to what I am talking about. I utilize every trite convention of the audiophile vernacular to reach shallow, and often, meaningless conclusions, based on 'listening tests' that involve neither 'listening' nor any real testing. Indeed, half the time, I am preoccupied with other things as I write my comments, and probably wouldn't know what a real instrument sounds like, or test result looks like, if it bit me in the ass."
Go for it.
 
Tim,

Perhaps Greg should write us a standard disclaimer we put in our post signature every time we recommend something. Fraud is really a severe accusation. :(

Perhaps in Portugal. Here in the US, consumer protections are incredibly weak and advertising claims are unmonitored by anyone but consumers themselves. The exceptions being food and drugs. We do a little better there. Standard disclaimers? MHO. YMMV.

Tim
 
Or this:

Whart said:

"As may be obvious, I have no clue as to what I am talking about. I utilize every trite convention of the audiophile vernacular to reach shallow, and often, meaningless conclusions, based on 'listening tests' that involve neither 'listening' nor any real testing. Indeed, half the time, I am preoccupied with other things as I write my comments, and probably wouldn't know what a real instrument sounds like, or test result looks like, if it bit me in the ass."

I would wish I said that, but I've already got a bad enough reputation around here.

Tim
 
"As may be obvious, I have no clue as to what I am talking about. I utilize every trite convention of the audiophile vernacular to reach shallow, and often, meaningless conclusions, based on 'listening tests' that involve neither 'listening' nor any real testing. Indeed, half the time, I am preoccupied with other things as I write my comments, and probably wouldn't know what a real instrument sounds like, or test result looks like, if it bit me in the ass."

How did you know? You must have bugged my listening room/computer.
 
---- What do you guys think of all those FBI warnings at the beginning of each Blu-ray movie?

Now they even have more; three logos and texts in English, French, and Spanish.
...& in front of a full bright & bloody red screen (the texts).

...Enough to give you a heart attack before the film even begins! :eek:
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing