I agree, the cheerleading can certainly start to feel a little smothered with too much group-think.I pulled this from another Thread where Wil posted. It made me think on something. What I have seen suppressed many times and has lead to many good people leaving the forum is members that no longer post about issues or bad experience they have with gear. You are only allowed to cheerlead. Anyone who rises up and says they are having issues is shouted down and driven off the forum. That is why all the best members left, outside Ted Denny.
I do not think this is a forum owner or moderator issue. Its a members issue. There are ego tied with money. The members have spent big $$$ and do not want anyone telling them, or publicizing the purchase they made has issue. Just recently on Rons thread he mentioned Boulder and someone immediately slashed out of the water and attacked Ron for bringing up Boulder as an example of what he did not like.
To a large degree, the manufacturer marketing, promotions and cheerleading are all ego driven, consumer backed hype that hides and protects the manufacturer from revealing flaws and deficiency in their equipment. Its not Whatbestforum doing it.
No I am not going to name names and draw out manufacturer. But we all have had conversations with friends who are pissed about something in the purchases they made, yet won't go public. If they choose to do that, then honor them and respect their comments as a reality and possible flaw the manufacturer might need to address. if anything, they may go the Monico route and fix the issues so that their product works better, instead of putting out the same flaw for others to suffer with.
Everything you read here has to be done so with your critical thinking filter turned on.
I’d like to see this a place where challenging, but thoughtful, questions can be asked of manufacturers. If they can’t give meaningful answers to such questions, then that should tell you something!
On the other hand, I don’t think this should be a place where poisonous and intellectually dishonest loose cannons, with no other purpose than drawing attention to themselves (and perhaps their YouTube channels), should be tolerated.
I haven’t agreed with some of the bannings that have taken place here, but sometimes it’s the right move.