I put my money on no 3 as most important
good call.
I put my money on no 3 as most important
Try playing your speakers in a bathroom to see how natural they sound![]()
Do y'all remember when David Karmeli posted a very interesting video about this topic employing a drummer in a empty room which was gradually filled with sound absorbing material? As sound absorbing material was added to the room the tonal balance of the sound of the drumming in the room changed radically.
People who watched the video liked the sound at many different points along the timeline from empty, completely bright and totally reflective room to modest absorption to an absorptive room where a lot of of the brightness was removed from the room.
This is exactly the same movie that plays out here when people on WBF debate whether absorption is good, absorption is bad, and how much absorption sounds good to each of them in their rooms.
If I remember correctly David and Peter and Tim liked the sound of the drummer with little to no absorption in the room. I found that sound to be an unlistenable cacophony. That's why this is a subjective hobby.
That was a very interesting demonstration Ron. I remember it well. I won’t speak for David or Tim, but the reason I preferred the room without the absorption was that it sounded like a drum being played in a room without absorption. There was an authenticity to it, and it was easily identifiable and sounded the way we would expect it to sound. This was in stark contrast to the sound of the drum being played after all the absorption panels were installed. Everyone could tell it was a drum, but it no longer sounded like a natural drum in a room. There was information and energy suddenly removed from the room by the panels.
People can do whatever they want in their listening rooms to create the sound that they prefer. I now try to manage the energy in the room rather than eliminate it. I first saw that video posted and discussed on Myles’s forum. A very fascinating demonstration as I recall it solicited many different opinions.
There was a series of three blind testing videos I did, where the room had 10, none, and 6 absorbers. People liked 6 the best, followed by none and then 10 - which is also what Hieukm confirmed had happened in the room - it was his friend’s room in Vietnam
I have seen on your videos the boards you add. Do you really think they make a difference ? Why would a narrow board placed against a wall make any difference?People can do whatever they want in their listening rooms to create the sound that they prefer. I now try to manage the energy in the room rather than eliminate it. I first saw that video posted and discussed on Myles’s forum. A very fascinating demonstration as I recall it solicited many different opinions.
I don’t think most have a developed (mature?) target or values. They keep rolling along. Leads to NLF which is coming in the hobbyI think people basically shape their system’s presentation in their rooms based on their target and values.
I have seen on your videos the boards you add. Do you really think they make a difference ? Why would a narrow board placed against a wall make any difference?
I don’t think most have a developed (mature?) target or values. They keep rolling along. Leads to NLF which is coming in the hobby
the reason I preferred the room without the absorption was that it sounded like a drum being played in a room without absorption.
I don’t think most have a developed (mature?) target or values.
| Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |