I've corrected some of the rather bold and incorrect comments about vinyl over there. One common myth is there's less resolution near the runout grooves. I found I was easily able to record a 30KHz tone in that area and play it back using a Grado Gold cartridge. Also distortion of the media is much lower than they usually state. This is because so much feedback has to be used with the cutterhead. Ask Bruno Putzeys what 45dB of feedback can do for an amplifier... most of the 'distortion of the LP' occurs in playback and is wildly different depending on the arm, cartridge, how well they match, setup and loading if needed. The platter pad of the turntable affects distortion as well. So most of the studies you see are really just bad science and many of them were made in the 1960s before cartridges and tonearms were really figured out.Or do you hold that a preference for vinyl has to be an objective truth for any discerning audiophile? If so, you would in a way be no different from the "objective" ASR crowd that holds digital must be objectively better because it measures better.
This is done to add some 3rd harmonic, which makes the presentation sound richer as that is the dominate distortion any properly functioning tape machine makes.There seems to be a strange trend of 'translating' digital masters by transferring to analog tape to 'improve' the sound.
Depending on how avid you are to really hear a particular recording at its best might mean that even as a rabid digiphile you'd still have to own LPs and have a good quality turntable. This is simply because master tapes degrade over time so digital releases made from a master tape made 30-50 years ago aren't going to sound as lively and vivacious as they did when they were new! So the only way to really hear what that is about is to get the original LP pressing.Do they ever realize that, by their own “logic,” it’s just as ridiculous to listen to analog-sourced digital? If purity is the holy rule, then I suppose all those music sourced from analog master tapes magically become invalid the second they’re digitized.
A first pressing LP is good, but it depends on how many copies of the mother you have; there are significant sonic differences. The deadwax number (scratched ) provides a lot of useful information, mostly the pressing plant, recording engineer, and copy number. A or 1 is the first cut, which is the best quality. There are many websites about it, and it's become a science among collectors.Depending on how avid you are to really hear a particular recording at its best might mean that even as a rabid digiphile you'd still have to own LPs and have a good quality turntable. This is simply because master tapes degrade over time so digital releases made from a master tape made 30-50 years ago aren't going to sound as lively and vivacious as they did when they were new! So the only way to really hear what that is about is to get the original LP pressing.

A first pressing LP is good, but it depends on how many copies of the mother you have; there are significant sonic differences. The deadwax number (scratched ) provides a lot of useful information, mostly the pressing plant, recording engineer, and copy number. A or 1 is the first cut, which is the best quality. There are many websites about it, and it's become a science among collectors.
Yes, I've spent a lot of time looking at the lead out grooves on this account. Its much easier to sort out the older LPs in this regard, but in the context of the analog/digital thing that just reared its head again, the older LPs are where its most important.A first pressing LP is good, but it depends on how many copies of the mother you have; there are significant sonic differences.
I can't work that much when I sometimes see how much money A-cuts are sold for on eBay...lolThis trend has certainly made me work harder!![]()
Back in the halcyon days of vinyl, hanging at the record store was a great key to finding new music, for sure. Now, the streaming algorithms try, but it just isn't the same.I don't think many people go into record stores and buy music of artists they've never heard, much less buy tickets to live performances. So, streaming seemingly has some benefits for artists.
there are three main threads and like a fungus they come back. Horns vs others , Tubes vs transistors and analog versus digital.Am I the only one who thinks this thread has drifted way off track? What’s the point of arguing about whether vinyl or digital is better or more accurate? Each is a fun way to enjoy music. Some like one more than the other, which is fine but it doesn’t mean that is the best option for everyone.
there are three main threads and like a fungus they come back. Horns vs others , Tubes vs transistors and analog versus digital.
I can't believe people aren't truly ill from the SOS. I know I am . I don't care I got what I want and I don't feel the need to pontificate but alas that is not WBF these days.
Do you know how to get three audiophiles to agree? Didn't think so LOL
Am I the only one who thinks this thread has drifted way off track? What’s the point of arguing about whether vinyl or digital is better or more accurate? Each is a fun way to enjoy music. Some like one more than the other, which is fine but it doesn’t mean that is the best option for everyone.
So if streaming is your only medium you may never be done, at least not anywhere in the near future.
I for sure have no idea have no clue as to the future quality of streaming as we seem to uncover more and more ways to remove the noise and get much better sound. I am almost totally that way and have invested heavily into it while doing a lot of noise reduction this summer , both electrical, network, grounding and isolation. All of these made improvements in the playback and my enjoying it more and more. Will it get better? I always hope so as it is a very young source and although above my pay grade one hopes there is a lot more to come.Sorry, but I disagree.
The thread is about, “How do you know when you are done?” Digital is only in its youth, per se. The advancements in the last 5 years alone have been staggering. More are sure to come.
Streaming is still in its infancy. Streaming companies aren’t even making a profit yet and (non-politically speaking) if certain countries begin adding tariffs (in the U.S. laws would need to change) to foreign downloads, artists, etc. it may not last. A 100% tariff on foreign films is already being floated.
Internet mechanical connections will improve as our Optical and Cat connections become extinct. So unless your streamer and DACs have expansion ports in them you may be purchasing again when the time comes …
So if streaming is your only medium you may never be done, at least not anywhere in the near future.
Many could stop now as they have enough LPs and CDs to last the remainder of their lives, and then some.
There is still a lot of music that is not available on streaming services.So if streaming is your only medium you may never be done, at least not anywhere in the near future.
A few do indeed appear obsessed. Is there some insecurity lurking?Funny that you would say this when the current discussion started when some vinyl lovers made some very questionable, even conspiratorial, statements about digital vs analog some 5 pages back, on thread page 17 to be precise. You think those should have gone unchallenged?
Funny that it's rarely lovers of digital who start a digital vs analog discussion.
It seems that vinyl lovers are the ones obsessed with the topic.
According to Google, “natural sound is an accurate and realistic portrayal of an original sound or soundscape, creating a feeling of being present in the original environment without artificial coloration or simulation.”
If streaming is one's only medium, they have nothing to compare it to. How would they know whether or not to upgrade?
Streaming is not my only medium. I use LP's as well as physical digital. If I didn't have anything to compare streaming to, I would honestly be done. It is eerily close to physical digital in my rig, and thoroughly enjoyable for hours and hours on end with zero fatigue.
If streaming was my only medium, I would be perfectly fine with what I am hearing through it now....until my streamer became a heavy doorstop, hopefully a decade or so down the road.
Tom
Interesting. When I read this definition of "natural sound" it struck me as another way to describe "accurate sound". Seems Keats was correct (or maybe "accurate"):Doc, This is it!
A tube amp driven horn system playing vinyl is the best. That is the OBJECTIVE TRUTH.
(At least that's what the subjective consensus of some of the loudest and most persistent voices on WBF seems to say. Do they speak for everyone? They sure would like to think so. Hehe, good luck with that.)
| Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |