I presume that you were able to do this on any of your previous digital sources? Or has Wadax meant that you listen to more digital now due to its performance?it's the way i listen to new music and how i easily explore musical threads.
I presume that you were able to do this on any of your previous digital sources? Or has Wadax meant that you listen to more digital now due to its performance?it's the way i listen to new music and how i easily explore musical threads.
He has the new flagship. His whole vinyl front is all Kronos including the phono and arm. Cartridge is Opus1. Excellent sound! Capturing more and more of digital strengths, more quiet more pitch black but still keep the exciting more emotional connection part of vinyl than tape. If you have AS2000 you will realize the Kronos dont have the same level of natural nuances and balance. I have listened in real quite a few times in comparison to the Wadax in the same system. I am not putting down Wadax. The Wadax is the only digital so far that I feel comfortable with the tone. Great great machine as Mike said. But I think there are still a bit more room for improvement. I am sure Mike know where. Eventhough the tone of Wadax is very much unlike digital and never bug my ears, that tone and presence is still uncomparable to the best of vinyl especially if you own the Neumann DST. But it is true as Mike said you dont want to listen to same music over and over just because the sound is good. You want tobe able to explore new music which mostly now made in digital format. So Wadax makes allthe senses for people who can pay close to $200,000. They have the money and they can spend another $100,000 more for future improvements that sure will be made in a couple years. It is just crazy money that bug people when talk about Wadax imo. If Wadax cost 10% more than the Horizon it sure will cannibalize the sales of Horizon dramatically I think.Tang, does your friend have the Kronos Pro or the latest new flagship that I think is called Discovery or something. It is a stand alone complete design on its own integral floor standing rack.
yes, of course the MSB/Extreme was first rate doing this too.....and the MSB was a few notches above the GG1.5 or Aqua Formula that were my previous dacs. they each were capable, but they did not take me musically to where i now am.I presume that you were able to do this on any of your previous digital sources?
yes; for sure. i'd say even after 5 months now, i'm more excited for my digital listening than ever, my digital sessions last longer, and i'm more likely to be aggressive listening to most anything since the Wadax makes it all better. i value my digital listening time more; it's more than just fill in or multi-tasking time music. it's serious. there is just more 'real life' in the music. it grabs me. and changed how i view it.Or has Wadax meant that you listen to more digital now due to its performance?
If the proof of the pudding is in the eating, then I guess you are full up! Congrats.yes, of course the MSB/Extreme was first rate doing this too.....and the MSB was a few notches above the GG1.5 or Aqua Formula that were my previous dacs. they each were capable, but they did not take me musically to where i now am.
yes; for sure. i'd say even after 5 months now, i'm more excited for my digital listening than ever, my digital sessions last longer, and i'm more likely to be aggressive listening to most anything since the Wadax makes it all better. i value my digital listening time more; it's more than just fill in or multi-tasking time music. it's serious. there is just more 'real life' in the music. it grabs me. and changed how i view it.
certainly i'm now viewing digital listening in a fundamentally different way than before.
I was somewhat surprised by visitor comments on the Wadax, Kõda, Kharma system sound. In my experience K?da kit needs time to settle after it's been moved, but that should not be a factor here.
I have heard Kõda drive big speakers with ease, but for me the magic comes when married to high resolution, efficient loads e.g. Lumen White.
In my experience, you don't need grounding for Kõda to shine, the Tripoint I used with the Thor SE took the system performance further but it was also mighty fine without.
The Robert Kõda K70 GII is something very special to my ears, I still have mine (and my K15). I haven't heard the K160 yet, I suspect I'll still prefer the K70 but who knows...
Interesting also to read (elsewhere on this forum) that someone preferred the Kronos TT over the Wadax.
Most interesting! I am still getting to know the Robert Kodas and always respect other people's experiences with equipment. What drove you to toe other efforts on 'every other parameter'? Was there something about the Robert Koda that (on its own) did some seem complete?Wadax good looking imposing models build as a tank but to my ears every time i have listened to it sounds open analytical and on the thin side not much magic unless you combine whit other gear that has overly full body tonality....
Big Kharma speakers whit the diamond tweeters costing 400K or much more probably best looking speakers fit and finish is close too perfection but sounds like freezer ,2 dimensional, big 15 inch woofers but no punching and shaking bass performance when the music need it in my opinion for the very rich who likes to impose friends and visitors but whit no knowledge about the deepness and true beauty of music....
Robert Koda: i used to have Robert Koda for many years in my system when i had the K160 Monos i was able to get really high levels of true dynamic and true magical performance but to achieve this i did so much effort on every other parameter of the room electricity grounding resonance control that probably many other amps treated whit the same enerhy effort know how and bulk of money would achieve those levels also costing less than Robert Koda K160.... Robert Koda s best amplifier is and was the Hybrid 3 pieces K70MKII that is a amplifier whit soul magic silence perfect tonality and speed i feel pity that i sold mine...
So if i in my humble opinion sum up the 3 brands in the Wadax room above me may self not being a visitor of Munchen this year i can understand why nobody was touched and involved whit true beauty of music in a system costing far above 1 million dolars...... The summing up of the products natural consequence of a sum it seems to me!
Hi Amadeus, may I please ask you the following:Wadax good looking imposing models build as a tank but to my ears every time i have listened to it sounds open analytical and on the thin side not much magic unless you combine whit other gear that has overly full body tonality....
Big Kharma speakers whit the diamond tweeters costing 400K or much more probably best looking speakers fit and finish is close too perfection but sounds like freezer ,2 dimensional, big 15 inch woofers but no punching and shaking bass performance when the music need it in my opinion for the very rich who likes to impose friends and visitors but whit no knowledge about the deepness and true beauty of music....
Robert Koda: i used to have Robert Koda for many years in my system when i had the K160 Monos i was able to get really high levels of true dynamic and true magical performance but to achieve this i did so much effort on every other parameter of the room electricity grounding resonance control that probably many other amps treated whit the same enerhy effort know how and bulk of money would achieve those levels also costing less than Robert Koda K160.... Robert Koda s best amplifier is and was the Hybrid 3 pieces K70MKII that is a amplifier whit soul magic silence perfect tonality and speed i feel pity that i sold mine...
So if i in my humble opinion sum up the 3 brands in the Wadax room above me may self not being a visitor of Munchen this year i can understand why nobody was touched and involved whit true beauty of music in a system costing far above 1 million dolars...... The summing up of the products natural consequence of a sum it seems to me!
Exactly the same impressions hereWadax good looking imposing models build as a tank but to my ears every time i have listened to it sounds open analytical and on the thin side not much magic unless you combine whit other gear that has overly full body tonality....
Big Kharma speakers whit the diamond tweeters costing 400K or much more probably best looking speakers fit and finish is close too perfection but sounds like freezer ,2 dimensional, big 15 inch woofers but no punching and shaking bass performance when the music need it in my opinion for the very rich who likes to impose friends and visitors but whit no knowledge about the deepness and true beauty of music....
Robert Koda: i used to have Robert Koda for many years in my system when i had the K160 Monos i was able to get really high levels of true dynamic and true magical performance but to achieve this i did so much effort on every other parameter of the room electricity grounding resonance control that probably many other amps treated whit the same enerhy effort know how and bulk of money would achieve those levels also costing less than Robert Koda K160.... Robert Koda s best amplifier is and was the Hybrid 3 pieces K70MKII that is a amplifier whit soul magic silence perfect tonality and speed i feel pity that i sold mine...
So if i in my humble opinion sum up the 3 brands in the Wadax room above me may self not being a visitor of Munchen this year i can understand why nobody was touched and involved whit true beauty of music in a system costing far above 1 million dolars...... The summing up of the products natural consequence of a sum it seems to me!
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |