SAT Direct Drive Turntable!

Really. I find Fremer one of the few reviewers that likes speed, attack, tone and dynamics and listens to modern music a well as classics.

Lot's of reviewers comment on those attributes, though in the case of 'speed' and 'attack' they may use different words.
 
I will soon hit 45. Takes time for me to get up there
 
Lot's of reviewers comment on those attributes, though in the case of 'speed' and 'attack' they may use different words.

that is true Tim, but they mean different things in classical to rock for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tima
lol
 
I will soon hit 45. Takes time for me to get up there

Ked, I have heard that about you. age has nothing to do with it thou ;)
 
Michael Fremer loves it.


 
  • Like
Reactions: displayname
It's based on the Technic SP-10R direct drive mechanism and most probably the new Minus-K ultra-thin CT-2 passive anti-vibration platform.

The latter is very good. A friend of mine has purchased one for his Micro Seiki 8000 turntable recently.

However the price of a CT-2 is just a few percents of the cost of the SAT turntable.
:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: christoph
The passive vacuum platter sounds like a complete PITA that VPI would dream up, not something that adds 38,000 Euro to the price and ease of use.

Why was there no comparison between non vacuum and vacuum sound of the SAT?

Surely this table deserved a full review from Fremer.

@Tango - are you getting one? comparisons to what you have now would be wonderful. :cool:
 
The passive vacuum platter sounds like a complete PITA that VPI would dream up, not something that adds 38,000 Euro to the price and ease of use.

Why was there no comparison between non vacuum and vacuum sound of the SAT?

Surely this table deserved a full review from Fremer.

He did do a full review in the December stereophile
 
  • Like
Reactions: XV-1
He did do a full review in the December stereophile

Ked, its the same analog corner article as posted above. so no full review.
 
Last edited:
Wow! Michael sure does love it!

I think that is Michael's most enthusiastic, most unequivocally rave review in quite some time!

I thought it was a very well-researched, very well-written and very communicative comparative review.
 
Last edited:
thanks Ked. maybe Fremer answers my questions on vacuum/non vacuum. I will have to have a read of it.

He describes how to use the vacuum but not what happens to the sound with vacuum on vs off
 
Ked, its the same analog corner article as posted above. so no full review.

Ah yes the analog corner article is the same just saw it. It describes in detail set up, use, sound with compares.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing