Oh, I thought you were quite enamored of the REL six pack.
I do like the REL six pack but that is a pretty expensive set-up. Also, my understanding of John Hunter's implementation of the six pack is to use slightly rising crossover points as you go up from the lower pair to the middle pair to the higher pair.
My interest in subwoofers, if at all, is strictly 25 to 30 Hz and below with a steep slope -- only for the very lowest bass down to infrasonic. The Gryphon bass towers are incredibly powerful but delicate multi-barrel cannons. Their specification is -3dB down at 16Hz.
But because of the complexity of the overlap of the high passed woofer ribbons combined with the completely non-adjustable crossover frequency and slope of the Gryphon bass towers I cannot play the Gryphon bass towers at a level as high as I would like. Raising the high pass from 250Hz to 280Hz as Marty suggests would smooth out the overlap and allow a higher level setting on the Gryphon bass towers. This might completely obviate the desire for subwoofers for very low bass.
Respectfully Ron, you may be churning your impressions of the sound of your system because many of your visitors seem to be making changes to your system to satisfy their preferences.
Respectfully you have never understood the personal use to which I put visitor comments. My impressions of the sound of my system do not turn based on visitor changes. I know what I don't like about the sound of the system, and I know the sound I want to move to.
For years there has been to my ears an unacceptable edginess in the upper midrange the source of which has changed over time. This has been complicated and confounding.
I have never made a change to satisfy a visitor's or commenter's preference unless it was 100% a change in the direction that my ears want the system to go.
Frankly, I’m quite surprised you don’t remember, or you don’t know, the differences you heard with those tube traps in the front corners versus having them removed from the room.
I'm not sure why you're surprised but that's OK. As a matter of methodological integrity I really don't believe in A/B. I insist wherever possible in A/B/A. Upon removal if I had to guess the bass sounded may be a touch more open and a touch more dynamic. But I don't consider that to be a valid observation without going back to having them in place and achieving an A/B/A comparison.
I commend you for your seeming willingness to have visitors experiment so freely to improve the sound of your system.
Robbes is a professional audio recording engineer. He has set up recording studios. I would be disappointed if he was not better at discerning small sonic differences than I am.
As a former pro audio person I know that he prefers a more neutral tonal balance, a more neutral sound than I do. So after he set the Gryphon bass towers to what he felt was neutral, I listened to my favorite tracks and bumped it up a couple of dB to satisfy my personal preferences on tonal balance and bass response and bass impact. In this context it is interesting for me to have a professional set it at what he perceives as neutral, and from there I can adjust to achieve my personal taste preference.
I hope this explanation gives better insight into why I like to hear people's comments and how I use those comments and their proposed system changes to establish a professional baseline which I then work off of to achieve the sound I personally want.
At some point, I am hoping that you describe the sound of your system in your own words in your own system thread so that we get a truer sense of what you think.
The headline as of today is that I am really happy with the sound of the system. At the moment I am not changing a thing, not a single thing. The bane of my problems for years -- edginess --is completely gone. I am ecstatic that the edginess is gone. I love the tonal balance.
In the future I may try Marty's suggestion about a 280Hz crossover with another pair of Phil Marchand custom crossover/attenuator boxes to see if that allows me to raise the Gryphon bass towers level.
The room mode which has been bedeviled me for a long time and which screwed up double bass by over-emphasizing ~105Hz is gone.
I am very, very happy with the tonal balance of the system. I am hearing it as natural-sounding, sweet highs, dynamic, impactful and realistic. While I'm not terribly sensitive to driver non-integration and the Frankenstein configuration could be a prescription for driver discontinuity I am hearing it as well-integrated and nothing weird sounding.
I find the harmonics and the decay of this 100% all tube system to be realistic, natural, gorgeous and life-like.
Marty is extremely sensitive to driver discontinuity and I think he is not finding as much to complain about in that area as he would expect to find from such a Frankenstein system.
I am happy that the Italians are finally working well for the specific purpose for which I bought them -- driving the midrange/tweeter ribbons.
I am now very glad that I was unsuccessful in selling the VTLs over the last two years because they are now working beautifully in triode mode (on the lowest damping/feedback setting) to dial in a modest amount of woofer-cooking, and to achieve my personal preference in upper bass to lower midrange texture, body and impact.
With all of this (despite all of this) Frankenstein complexity I finally
-- am capitalizing on the open presentation of planar dipoles which I have loved my entire life
-- am enjoying highly resolving ribbon drivers with no sacrifice in upper bass to lower midrange body and weight due to the mild woofer-cooking
-- am hearing beautiful and natural and fatigue-free highs due to parallel SET amplification on the midrange/tweeter ribbons
-- am enjoying low frequency extension and impact (below ~200Hz) with the Gryphon bass towers (which literally are a unique design in all of high-end audio and the very best implementation of the powered woofer tower concept ever produced)
-- am enjoying the convincing sound of a truly full-range system with, to my ears, no compromise in any segment of the frequency range, addressing and solving for any criticism of dipole planar loudspeakers
PS: I still wish my room were 5 feet longer!