I’m generally of the opinion that burn-in is measured as the time needed for psychological adjustment to come to terms with the latest cash-dump.I agree with you that something seems off with those observations. I had never seen anyone say that QSA treated products don’t need burn in to sound best. I’m aware of people even mentioning that patience is needed.
I also think there is some truth in the rule that the quality of a product is inversely proportional to the amount of b/s required to sell it. As QSAL sets the standard for b/s, something which I can only admire, there is zero chance of my ever indulging in them.
The QSA pixie dust is apparently a burn-in process. Two sources of evidence:
- A video the Hong Kong audio salesman (Chang?) who first punted it posted a video of it on YouTube 5 or 6 years ago.
- The UK distributor assured me, in writing, that the process is totally non-invasive. (If it was invasive, it would make their 13A fuses illegal.)
But, hey, this is audiophilia, so nothing surprises me. Well, not quite not nothing. For a product constantly claimed to be transformational, other than two people at Stereo Times, no one seems interested. After a deep dive into Stereo Times over the last 5 minutes, they gush effusively over anything that crosses their threshold. Maybe the audio industry just aren’t interested because most of the products are rebranded versions of other people’s stuff.