Natural Sound

I can understand ML2 and ML3 being a strong reason to try the hybrid, but not the other way round

Perhaps.

You need to understand that several of my choices followed my equipment reviews for TAB -- there (and at SoundStage) I was given assignments about what to cover. I felt I needed to have equipment suited to those assignments and to get new assignments. When I started reviewing in 2004 I had Conrad Johnson. I reviewed the OTL Atma-Sphere M60 which I really liked and bought their MA-1 and MP-1. I was 'given' (encouraged) the opportunity to have Wilson speakers and bought the original Sasha W/P (an upgrade to me) which I used with autoformers on the MA-1. Not an ideal match, but it worked for my purposes.

atma_sphere_ma1_room.jpg
[You can see an autoformer at the back of the lefthand Sasha and a hint of the MA-1 on the righthand speaker. There's the Ref 5, the MP-1 and an Ayre CD player and a Teres turntable with SME V. There's a CJ PV-8 on the window ledge though used their 16LS pre. Not my current house.]

Then came a time when I had a bunch of equipment kinda stacked up for listening. I was given the Lamm M1.2 to review. I was also loaned the ARC Refernce 250 monos by Shunyata Grant. The Atma MP-1 and Lamm M1.2 had an XLR incompatibility so I needed a different preamp. I bought an ARC Ref 5 linestage. Toward the end of the M1.2 review period the Alexia 1 arrived for review -- a more suitable match. I bought the M1.2s, gave back the 250 monos and sold the Atma-Sphere gear. It was a substantial transition and, as a fan of Wilson and Lamm, my editor was happy . So the M1.2 came first and that's why.

I followed the Alexia 1 review with an Alexia 2 review (thanks to owning a suitable amp) I gave that to PF when they hired me. THEN I learned about horns (with your help and others) and made the switch to JBL and eventually to the ML2. The M1.2 works well with the JBLs as you acknowledged (without endorsing) from some of my videos. I have a higher opinion of it than you and that's okay.

Audiophile madness happens in different ways to different people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amir and treitz3
I don’t disagree. I can see why things happen, whether your Lamm choices or Ron’s continuing box swaps.

Problem is how they are justified or if a component is deified. In this case it wasn’t just about you, but a mix of on this thread Amir making it sound as if it is mother’s milk, or the part which Hopkins quoted about special research, and so on.

I have nothing against Ron’s box swaps either, except where he comes in to deny he is a swapper
 
Perhaps.

You need to understand that several of my choices followed my equipment reviews for TAB -- there (and at SoundStage) I was given assignments about what to cover. I felt I needed to have equipment suited to those assignments and to get new assignments. When I started reviewing in 2004 I had Conrad Johnson. I reviewed the OTL Atma-Sphere M60 which I really liked and bought their MA-1 and MP-1. I was 'given' (encouraged) the opportunity to have Wilson speakers and bought the original Sasha W/P (an upgrade to me) which I used with autoformers on the MA-1. Not an ideal match, but it worked for my purposes.

View attachment 163338
[You can see an autoformer at the back of the lefthand Sasha and a hint of the MA-1 on the righthand speaker. There's the Ref 5, the MP-1 and an Ayre CD player and a Teres turntable with SME V. There's a CJ PV-8 on the window ledge though used their 16LS pre. Not my current house.]

Then came a time when I had a bunch of equipment kinda stacked up for listening. I was given the Lamm M1.2 to review. I was also loaned the ARC Refernce 250 monos by Shunyata Grant. The Atma MP-1 and Lamm M1.2 had an XLR incompatibility so I needed a different preamp. I bought an ARC Ref 5 linestage. Toward the end of the M1.2 review period the Alexia 1 arrived for review -- a more suitable match. I bought the M1.2s, gave back the 250 monos and sold the Atma-Sphere gear. It was a substantial transition and, as a fan of Wilson and Lamm, my editor was happy . So the M1.2 came first and that's why.

I followed the Alexia 1 review with an Alexia 2 review (thanks to owning a suitable amp) I gave that to PF when they hired me. THEN I learned about horns (with your help and others) and made the switch to JBL and eventually to the ML2. The M1.2 works well with the JBLs as you acknowledged (without endorsing) from some of my videos. I have a higher opinion of it than you and that's okay.

Audiophile madness happens in different ways to different people.
Thank you for sharing nice photo, lovely room and setup
 
I don’t disagree. I can see why things happen, whether your Lamm choices or Ron’s continuing box swaps.

Problem is how they are justified or if a component is deified. In this case it wasn’t just about you, but a mix of on this thread Amir making it sound as if it is mother’s milk, or the part which Hopkins quoted about special research, and so on.

I have nothing against Ron’s box swaps either, except where he comes in to deny he is a swapper

Kedar, I am fan of four tube amplifiers:

- Kondo Japan

(Kevin designer of Living Voice used Kondo 300B in munich 2014)

- Lamm

(David Karmeli likes Lamm and used Lamm in many shows)

- Audionote UK

(Audio Federation Mike is distributor of AN UK)

- Audiopax

(Jim Smith was distributor of Audiopax many years)


kondo is different to Lamm and all 4 amplifiers are different.

you know Lamm is good and I never said Lamm designed by god. I am also fan of ASR Emitter, Vitus, Robert Koda, TAD, Riviera Labs, Dartzeel, Neodio …

I agree with Brad that Lamm theory or it is better to say Lamm audio thinking is very good.

Maybe there are many good SET amplifiers that I do not know.

I think Kondo is King, High quality parts and beautiful sound.
 
Last edited:
Kedar, I am fan of four tube amplifiers:

- Kondo Japan

(Kevin designer of Living Voice used Kondo 300B in munich 2014)

- Lamm

(David Karmeli likes Lamm and used Lamm in many shows)

- Audionote UK

(Audio Federation Mike is distributor of AN UK)

- Audiopax

(Jim Smith was distributor of Audiopax many years)


kondo is different to Lamm and all 4 amplifiers are different.

you know Lamm is good and I never said Lamm designed by god. I am also fan of ASR Emitter, Vitus, Robert Koda, TAD, Riviera Labs, Dartzeel, Neodio …

I agree with Brad that Lamm theory or it is better to say Lamm audio thinking is very good.

Maybe there are many good SET amplifiers that I do not know.

I think Kondo is King, High quality parts and beautiful sound.

A few months ago you said you had never heard the Lamm. Have you heard it properly now
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing