Testing digital vs analog, again...
Good idea to do this, while my preamp is away. The "pure" signal from the Io, to the amps. I can do this, since my Io has volume controls and aux plus phono input.
Results:
The Io sounds good from the Aux input - which I use for digital. I have noticed this before, and it is confirmed, now. I wouldn't say that it vipes out the problems of digital. But it sounds quite good. I note that, the tonal character is often warmer and more bass-heavy, than from my analog source (LP playback of the same cut). This is somewhat curious. I use a Lyra Atlas cart, and reviews don't argue that it is "lean", but rather, "precise". Yet on some cuts it does sound more lean, than what I hear from digital (streaming from Qobuz). Note, there are method problems here, often the streaming is remastered, etc, from what I have on LP.
Second main result: even though the digital input sounds good, through the Io direct, it is no question, who is the master. Vinyl rules. Still. Even though my Teac NT-505 is now house-warm, and sounds good. I have wondered why, and listened more. Maybe it is just me, being conditioned to "vinyl sound"? Plus old man's ears? But I dont think so. Listening notes - LP playing means my wife puts her phone away - we get more of the total sound, the "klang" in the music, a larger sound picture, more 3d dimensional = are more engaged. And although the Atlas may not play the lowest bass as well as (some) digital, it sounds more coherent. Many digital remasters have additional defects, like lack of ambient sound (pro-tooled away - ?). The Atlas is clearly superior regarding voice, female voice especially. Even if the "klang" is a bit on the lean side. My Einstein preamp corrects this. A stepup for the MC might do the job also, but Glenn at A has argued against this - the "pure" tube gain is a major point with the Io. I agree.