I dont think so this thread started in a communicative manner , it was more like ganging up on Myles . Most assumptions were made with no experience of the product in question . The man's posted a review , there must be some substance to his findings , even if we do not understand the science or logic behind it . It is not like he is endorsing something that would lead to bankruptcy . I have tried the Furutech GTX-D AC Receptacles and HiFi-Tuning Fuse and find the improvements to be consistent with his observations . So give it a try or then hold your peace .
This is what I meant when I said a "typical" audiophile / reviewer response.
I didn't gang up on Myles, I questioned the review in accordance to it's negative perception of the hobby, he deflected, then responded with false allegations which I quickly dismissed.
Please don't throw the
"Buy/try 'em, or hold your peace"
... audiophile "clause" at me, in these cases, it comes across as solicitation.
It reenforces my contention that these silly devices hurt the perception (and credibility) of our hobby (& also Quantum Physics).
If you believe buying such devices is a requirement in order to prove them not as advertised, then go ahead, you part with your hard earned cash. They won't
entangle me from my money. Is it also a requirement that I purchase Maggic Pebbles, Clever little clocks, Super Intelligent chips, Teleportation Tweaks, simply in order to justify they're not BS?
Please ... my audio knowledge and sensibilities prohibit ...
If these "quantum-chips" work (????) it's certainly not happening on a "quantum" level. Anyone with even a basic understanding of physics knows better. The review includes little in actual "science" or "substance", only excuses for not providing such. Instead, Audiophiles are asked to believe otherwise, that the burden of proof somehow lays on our shoulders, not the company in question.
Give me a break!
Myles allied himself with these devices, that's his choice, not mine.
tb1