Come to my place there Jeff and weep at how digital shreds the ass out of your beloved vinyl... I consistently get Vinyl guys over here that applaud my rig and say if they hadn't spent $100K on their TT and vinyl collection they would never do it over again... You simply have not heard digital done right .... ask Dr. Vinyl.... He said 2 things that stuck out. 1. You need to charge admission for these demos 2. This is the first time Ive heard that Orchestral piece where the system can reproduce 100% of the Orchestra.. bottom to top with complete balance..... Not my words, ask Jose...
Mike,
i'll take a piece of this.
--bring your Playback Designs over and we will do a direct head to head with my Wadax. i'm sure the Playback Designs is really fine digital. not dissing it. but that is the first step. we both have our opinions which is all they are until we do the compare. done that compare with the MSB Select II, others have done it with other digital top levels. not seen it done with the Playbacks. but all the others only had one result.
---then we will go direct from the winner to my vinyl. which will be superior to the digital.
---i know how that goes as i do it every day. and the vinyl when directly compared wins 95% of the time and it's not close on the better pressings (70% of my 12,000 pressings).
Wow, what an assumptive guy you are Jeff... Bad form... Ive got dual Reel to Reel decks.. and not a BS Technics or Pioneer. Studer A80 with upgraded Flux Magnetics heads and upgraded electronics with outboard Nick Doshi Tape head preamp.. I bought out a studio vault from Hollywood, CA and have the ORIGINAL 2 inch 24 track session reels and the 2 channel mixdown tapes... Can you beat that with your "Cart, Arm and Phono stage"..
what good will 24 track 2 inch do you? not relevant for our purposes other than for a door stop.
some of my vinyl beats some of my tape. you gotta listen case by case. the tape has to be very good to beat a top level pressing.
as far as tape, know the Studer, know the Doshi, know the Flux Magnetic heads, prefer my
hot rodded ATR-102 with Flux Magnetic heads and the MR 70 pre's. on my better tapes it is superior to vinyl, but on many tapes the best vinyl is better or different/equal. only had the ATR-MR 70 for a short time and still need to do more compares, certainly this level tape performance is higher than my 3 Studer A-820's with the King Cello. might prefer your tape set-up too to what i had before. probably.
NO you cant... so I compare my digital with the Highest level of Analog... Come see for yourself.. For those that have not started Vinyl, its a waste of time and money... I know what goes into getting it perfect and its a pain in the royal ass and not cheap.. Not to mention collecting Vinyl at this point which is 30 to 50 and up to $300 per album for good pressings... Id be a complete asshole to recommend this to my burgeoning audiophiles.. BUT, I sure could make great money at selling them all the kit, couldnt I ?? YES. so Im killing my income by recommending against it because I put the best interest of my clients first... Its why Im TOP Global seller for Playback Designs (Whom MoFi has recently bought A to D and D to A to archive thier Master Tapes) So again, MoFi Chose the same brand I sell for digital and I can compare it hand to hand real time against a Studer A80 with Doshi Pre and FM Heads, and my digital is indistinguishable from Master Tape.... Much less the lossy vinyl remasters made from the tapes... So go ahead Jeff talk all you want , you have no clue who I am or my history in the industry NOR my ability to back my mouth up.... I walk the walk my friend...
love my vinyl, and i have my references too.
we can agree to disagree. but bluster does not replace experience. vinyl kicks ass. in a system with top level references for all the formats.
sounds like you need to upgrade your vinyl reference. it is not cutting it.
as far as MoFi and Playbacks, i get that. i know Andreas Koch, he has been a guest in my home. brilliant guy. i owned the first Playback Design retail unit back in 2005. it was my digital reference for 9 years. i respect that Andreas is a dsd expert, and that MoFi uses that for mastering. makes sense. but it's not proof of what is the best sounding dacs and servers. the recent MoFi pressings i own from the last 10 years which include the quad dsd step, are pretty 'meh' sounding. so whatever they are doing, not my cup of tea. i did hear the Playback Designs at the last Axpona and was impressed by what i heard. it certainly is very good. but it's not vinyl in respect to my reference for vinyl. maybe yours.
and if you really cannot hear a difference between the Playback Designs digital and the tape....well....er......something is not right somewhere. maybe the tape was sourced from the quad dsd file?
i do have a tape from a session where there was a quad dsd master and a 1/2" 15ips master also from the same mic feed. the tape wipes the floor with the digital in direct compare. not close. the quad dsd is very, very good....for sure. but is not the tape.
OTOH.....if i owned top level digital, jumping into vinyl or tape would be a question. the digital is good enough that you don't need analog. but analog does go to another level with the better media. but it's a hobby, and does not need to make sense, if we are having more fun.