even without the Thor Hammer the Alexx sounds better than the XLF
+1
even without the Thor Hammer the Alexx sounds better than the XLF
Francisco,
congrats for your system in progress.
Just to correct the title which is: La Donna è mobile.
sung by the Duke of Mantua in Verdi's opera, "Rigoletto.
Micro , how would you describe the lamm hybrids compared to the dart 108 soundwise , some say the lamm is more neutral.
I ll leave the wattage out of the equasion since its not a issue for me
I do not think is right choise.
I had Lamm 1.2 and Dart 108 clipping on my system with Avalon Eidolon.
As far as I remember the Avalon Eidolon's are very demanding - low efficient and tricky phase angles in the impedance, as well as their characteristic forward dispersion. They needed the Premier 8 to sound decent - all other cj amplfiers would clip.
Besides you have a large space to drive. Great speakers, but they need power.
Only if you accept the overall loss of scale and dynamics due to bass. I heard them several times in the same room -30 feet long - as mine. The difference in scale is enormous. IMHO the Alexx is a big Alexia II - the XLF plays is another league. If the replacement of the XLF is too expensive I will consider going back to the XLF without regrets.
The happy person who got mine could have bought the Alexx much cheaper than the XLF's and did not hesitate.
I have yet to hear the Alexx, but in all of the prior generations of Wilsons from XLF backwards, I have valued the big Xs above their smaller bretheren...a personal preference...due in large part to the big X's greater scale/effortlessness/bass.
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |