I find these comments on the Devialet rather interesting. It could be a case where both "sides" are right as some people expect/want a certain "sound" while others want something else.
As for the "side" I'm on, it's definitely the one that thinks the D-Premier is quite something. As for Stereophile's review, it's quite long after the fact as this product has been on the market for a couple years. Paul Miller of Hi-Fi News in the UK reviewed it first, and then he turned me on to it as he felt it to be the most significant amplifier development of the last 15 years. The fact that he says it's the most impressive product he's ever reviewed for the mag does say something though. I trust he heard what the rest of us did.
I reviewed it more than a year-and-a-half ago and, frankly, haven't heard anything quite as special since. Where the D-Premier might not be "good enough" is simply if it doesn't have enough power. Then again, no amp will be if that's the case. Otherwise...
The D-Premier has many positive attributes, but the three I invite you to explore and compare with other products on the market involve these this things:
1) Play a recording with a lot of spatial information and a truly three-dimensional stage. Familiarize yourself with it on whatever other system you want and then play it trough the D-Premier and see if you don't hear: 1) more information, 2) more starkly defined images, 3) better separation, including a clear-cut delineation between musicians, and 4) a almost holographic presence to the images in the stage. Quite simply, the D-Premier reveals more information than any other set of electronics I've heard that results in sounding, imaging, and detail retrieval that's without peer.
2) Grab an SPL meter an play anything that focuses attention to the mids and highs and play it VERY loudly through any set of electronics. Measure the average SPL. Then do the same thing with the D-Premier and take note if you feel it's not playing loud enough so that you keep turning it up. But check the SPL levels and see if it's the same or higher than what you're were listening at before. What I noticed was the D-Premier was so clean and clear and grainless, that at first I thought it wasn't play loud enough. But then I realized I was listening at far higher levels than before any other amp/preamp combinations were simply sounding louder because they were getting what I like to call "rangy" -- noisy, out of control, etc. The D-Premier remains remarkably composed at any point up to clipping.
3) Finally, the bass. When I first started listening to the D-Premier I feared a lack of bass. So I concentrated on bass-centric recordings and found that what I was hearing wasn't just deep, but astonishingly tight. Bass drums had visceral impact like I'd never heard before. Measurements of the D-Premier show an extremely low output impedance and a sky-high damping factory. It's control of the loudspeaker, particularly in the bass, is vise-like and, in my opinion, better than any amp out there.
These are just a few things that I want to point out because when I read so many comments, there are very few specifics. I encourage you to seek this product out and listen for what I mentioned. If you don't hear a difference, or the difference doesn't matter, so be it. But if you do hear the differences, as I did, you might find it difficult to listen to anything else after and not desire the same.
Here's my review from about a year-and-a-half ago:
http://www.soundstagehifi.com/index...5-devialet-d-premier-integrated-amplifier-dac
Thanks,
Doug Schneider