Future progress in reproduced sound

OK, thank you Lee. I understand that you don’t like it. If you can generalize, what specific sonic characteristic do you attribute to an equilateral triangle presentation?

Jim Smith voiced my old Magico Mini 2 system to my room and it sounded great with his roughly 83% ratio and a fair amount of toe in. Then my later Magico Q3 system had a similar ratio tweeter to tweeter vs listening seat with speakers aimed straight ahead. In both of these cases, if I moved the speakers further apart to get that equilateral triangle, the sound became thinner with less body and rich tone and the center image suffered. So that is what I actually heard from such a positioning.

Now admittedly, my corner horns are completely different and I am more or less at an equilateral triangle of 15 feet in my squarish room. And occasionally, I actually sit 7 feet away from each upper horn throat because it is the smoothest room response. This is basically directly on access with the center of the horn. This is where the tone is the purest, and the sound most immediate.

Lack of musical involvement. With Jim’s setup, I have heard more presence, dynamics, and tone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeterA
Ok, a recent setup of mine did fall within the 0.82 - 0.84 range. Yet my current one, with speakers in a different position in the room, doesn't at an 0.91 ratio. It clearly sounds better too. Does that make it "wrong" nonetheless?

My bet is the equilateral setup doesn’t actually sound better. However, if you are happy with it that’s what matters.
 
Lack of musical involvement. With Jim’s setup, I have heard more presence, dynamics, and tone.

Yes, those are the three sonic attributes he sets up for. These all improved for me too when he was finished, though I would be very curious to go back and experiment further with the speakers aimed straight ahead with no toe-in and none of the acoustic treatments I had when Jim was here. Of course it is too late now. He did tell me he accepts as a given the treatments in the room and does not generally add or remove them. He did play with rotating the Tube Traps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lee
My bet is the equilateral setup doesn’t actually sound better. However, if you are happy with it that’s what matters.

Yes, that's what matters. Also, it's not exactly equilateral.

And you would know that the 0.82 - 0.84 ratio would sound better exactly how? Don't forget I said that recently I had exactly that (with speakers in another spot in the room). So from afar you have more experience with my room and setup than I do, who have dealt with it in person for a long time? That's called "arm chair expertise" and it's ridiculous.

Look, I have no doubt that Jim Smith was able to work miracles in your room and I am happy for you. But respectfully, you can keep the guru worship for yourself.
 
Yes, that's what matters. Also, it's not exactly equilateral.

And you would know that the 0.82 - 0.84 ratio would sound better exactly how? Don't forget I said that recently I had exactly that (with speakers in another spot in the room). So from afar you have more experience with my room and setup than I do, who have dealt with it in person for a long time? That's called "arm chair expertise" and it's ridiculous.

Look, I have no doubt that Jim Smith was able to work miracles in your room and I am happy for you. But respectfully, you can keep the guru worship for yourself.

No guru worship here. It’s just a recognition that there is a formula which has worked across thousands of rooms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tima
Yes, those are the three sonic attributes he sets up for. These all improved for me too when he was finished, though I would be very curious to go back and experiment further with the speakers aimed straight ahead with no toe-in and none of the acoustic treatments I had when Jim was here. Of course it is too late now. He did tell me he accepts as a given the treatments in the room and does not generally add or remove them. He did play with rotating the Tube Traps.

He suggested the front wall and first reflection point treatments that he uses in his room. We added those in and they worked very well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron Resnick
No guru worship here. It’s just a recognition that there is a formula which has worked across thousands of rooms.

Great. As I said it is a very useful average and guiding point, but it is not always the last word in every situation.

On this thread alone you already have three people who prefer a different ratio. And none of them was thoughtless about it; all experimented.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing