Does it makes sense from a SQ POV to disable all WiFi 6 functionality and let a device operate in WiFi 5 mode only?WiFi 6 introduces a lot of jitter because of the way it works.
why not try it? provided there is a setting for it trying should be easy enoughDoes it makes sense from a SQ POV to disable all WiFi 6 functionality and let a device operate in WiFi 5 mode only?
Thx
Matt
@Xymox You are absolutely right about wifi 6 access points having more jitter.
I had to remove the non wifi 6 TP link access point because it was dropping connections.
I put the wifi 6 access point back in and it sounds terrible, even though it’s only used to control music playback. My streamer is not connected to it.
I’m going to try Aruba access point next.
You can still hit 850Mbps on wifi 5. So IMHO, no one really NEEDS wifi 6. Now wifi 6E, that has some things other then speed. BUT for audio use, just to control roon or a Taiko or something, wifi 5 on 5Ghz ( to get it up away from interferring ) turning off 2.4 and maybe more adjustments would seem like a great way to go.Does it makes sense from a SQ POV to disable all WiFi 6 functionality and let a device operate in WiFi 5 mode only?
Thx
Matt
You can still hit 850Mbps on wifi 5. So IMHO, no one really NEEDS wifi 6. Now wifi 6E, that has some things other then speed. BUT for audio use, just to control roon or a Taiko or something, wifi 5 on 5Ghz ( to get it up away from interferring ) turning off 2.4 and maybe more adjustments would seem like a great way to go.
Yea I used multiping set to 50 pings a second and recorded a chart pinging off a ipad thru some wifi systems. Wifi 6 always introduced more jitter ( like the measurable IT kind ) VS wifi 5. There was a near doubling of jitter. Latency also increased. WHich makes sense sorta as the wifi controller had to do more work to handle the wifi 6..
It could be that it was different Wifi chips, different mfgrs.. I have not jumped that deep into wifi devcies as the audio does not pass thru them, so, I have not cared too much..
I have not ever cracked open a Aruba. I think I might tho.
I am just curious, did you compare it to the Mikrotik mAP lite?TP Link TL-WA901N
Would you consider adopting me as your cousin, Chris?!I was doing some measurements of before and after the tweaks I do to the switch X today.
This is VERY typical for what i do do devices. The below spectrum analysis are on the 0.98V power supply that feeds the CPU/Switch chip on my Switch X. This power supply is created with a PWM switching regulator. Basically every piece of digital electronics around you has at least 3 of these feeding various chips. THESE ARE CRITICAL to the operation of the chip and device. Noise on these supplies ends up on all your signals and this noise also ends up as phase noise on clocks and even jitter on busses and digital signals. This noise is bad stuff and its in everything. Noise on power supply rails to chips results in noise on the signals and phase noise on the clocks.
I have been dealing with it for many years. The AppleTV X is a good example. The results of eliminating this BS seriously improves many aspects of device performance in many ways.
The RF these PWM regulators spew all over gets into everything and pollutes everything on the board and it even gets out of the devices and pollutes other devices by transmitting thru the air to other cables and devices.
So my setup to do these ABs. I just moved between the 2 units with a probe.
View attachment 111731
This is 5khz to 10Mhz. This is the 0.98V supply that feeds the CPU. Its the most polluting as jitter and radiated noise go everywhere.
All of these before and after mods are just normal for what I do.
This is the mess that comes from a PWM regulator. This is on the regulated "DC" voltage that feeds the CPU. This nasty BS causes all manner of jitter and you can pick up this spectrum of RF noise in the air 6 inches away from the regulator and on the ethernet signals. Its harmonic based on the fundamental freq of the clock for the PWM regulator, in this case 766Khz and it splatters all the way up to and past 10Mhz.
View attachment 111732
This is what it looks like once I am done. Same scale.. I can't get rid of it completly, but its reduced so much this is nearly negligible.
View attachment 111733
Zooming in much closer to the critical 5khz to 1Mhz spectrum.. You can clearly see the 766 khz primary clock feeding the PWM regulator as the peak and group of harmonics towards the right. You can also see all the harmonics related to it. ALL of this could jitter the CPU or the RF noise radiated thru things could cause noise and jitter in other sections of the device..
This is nasty stuff and has harmonics down lower then 5Khz RF. Very penetrating RF BS.
View attachment 111734
The final result of the mods on this critical band..
The primary PWM clock and a few harmonics are barely visible staying at the same scale. Its all still there, just radically reduced in level.
View attachment 111735
I can do this same thing to most any device and its always dramatic results. The AppleTV X was shocking. My new Switch X will be interesting..
I think I am going to tackle a Intel NUC soon. These little computers that can run Linux or windows and run a roon core or do NAS look like a worthy target. I don't think a big intense mother board and a insane set of CPUs is needed for audio work. In fact I think all that is a downside as dealing with all that comes at a expense. You really can't drop noise and jitter as much in big designs like a Taiko. I think smaller and way less power and complexity might be better.. We shall see..
I need to finish up some production runs of Switch Xs and ATVXs and then I will order up a NUC and jump into that.
XymoxI was doing some measurements of before and after the tweaks I do to the switch X today.
This is VERY typical for what i do do devices. The below spectrum analysis are on the 0.98V power supply that feeds the CPU/Switch chip on my Switch X. This power supply is created with a PWM switching regulator. Basically every piece of digital electronics around you has at least 3 of these feeding various chips. THESE ARE CRITICAL to the operation of the chip and device. Noise on these supplies ends up on all your signals and this noise also ends up as phase noise on clocks and even jitter on busses and digital signals. This noise is bad stuff and its in everything. Noise on power supply rails to chips results in noise on the signals and phase noise on the clocks.
I have been dealing with it for many years. The AppleTV X is a good example. The results of eliminating this BS seriously improves many aspects of device performance in many ways.
The RF these PWM regulators spew all over gets into everything and pollutes everything on the board and it even gets out of the devices and pollutes other devices by transmitting thru the air to other cables and devices.
So my setup to do these ABs. I just moved between the 2 units with a probe.
View attachment 111731
This is 5khz to 10Mhz. This is the 0.98V supply that feeds the CPU. Its the most polluting as jitter and radiated noise go everywhere.
All of these before and after mods are just normal for what I do.
This is the mess that comes from a PWM regulator. This is on the regulated "DC" voltage that feeds the CPU. This nasty BS causes all manner of jitter and you can pick up this spectrum of RF noise in the air 6 inches away from the regulator and on the ethernet signals. Its harmonic based on the fundamental freq of the clock for the PWM regulator, in this case 766Khz and it splatters all the way up to and past 10Mhz.
View attachment 111732
This is what it looks like once I am done. Same scale.. I can't get rid of it completly, but its reduced so much this is nearly negligible.
View attachment 111733
Zooming in much closer to the critical 5khz to 1Mhz spectrum.. You can clearly see the 766 khz primary clock feeding the PWM regulator as the peak and group of harmonics towards the right. You can also see all the harmonics related to it. ALL of this could jitter the CPU or the RF noise radiated thru things could cause noise and jitter in other sections of the device..
This is nasty stuff and has harmonics down lower then 5Khz RF. Very penetrating RF BS.
View attachment 111734
The final result of the mods on this critical band..
The primary PWM clock and a few harmonics are barely visible staying at the same scale. Its all still there, just radically reduced in level.
View attachment 111735
I can do this same thing to most any device and its always dramatic results. The AppleTV X was shocking. My new Switch X will be interesting..
I think I am going to tackle a Intel NUC soon. These little computers that can run Linux or windows and run a roon core or do NAS look like a worthy target. I don't think a big intense mother board and a insane set of CPUs is needed for audio work. In fact I think all that is a downside as dealing with all that comes at a expense. You really can't drop noise and jitter as much in big designs like a Taiko. I think smaller and way less power and complexity might be better.. We shall see..
I need to finish up some production runs of Switch Xs and ATVXs and then I will order up a NUC and jump into that.
I suspect router manufacturers don't believe routers can affect sound quality.Xymox
I love reading about your efforts but I have 2 questions (that I'm sort of embarrassed to ask). I obviously don''t know the extent of the noise reduction modifications that you have performed but based on what I see, it appears that there is an obvious addition of a large capacitor on the board that presumably contributes to the improved filtered noise performance you have shown so nicely between 5K and 10K. So my questions are:
1) If the improvements gained are so impressive from what appears to be a minimal additional of hardware, one has to wonder why the manufacturer doesn't employ these modest modifications themselves? Is it engineering competence? Cost? Other?
2) The bigger question is on the issue of presumed SQ improvement. We have seen/read many reports of seasoned users who have made great efforts (often at considerable expense) to use devices that provide "clean" power, but report their disappointment that the resultant sound was either unimproved or in some cases actually worse than using no power conditioning at all. Could the failure of some of these switch manufacturers not to employ what appears to be rather straight forward modifications such as you have performed be due to that fact they don't think that they really improve SQ after all is said and done?
Marty
Careful doing Aruba. Make SURE to get a IAP-xxx not a AP-xxx... The AP-xxx only work with a expensive controller. The IAPs are "instant and have a wifi interface. They do take more work and some experence doing them. Ebay is a great source for them. You can feed them from a linear 12V.
I assume your LPS is the same voltage as the stock supply? That is critical, but you also need sufficient current capability. Normally it is recommended to use a linear supply that is rated 15% higher than the SMPS it replaces.I tried Aruba AP-11, and it does work without a controller.
But I couldn’t get the WiFi working when the unit was powered by my linear power supply.
I assume your LPS is the same voltage as the stock supply? That is critical, but you also need sufficient current capability. Normally it is recommended to use a linear supply that is rated 15% higher than the SMPS it replaces.
Would you consider adopting me as your cousin, Chris?!
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |