As Steve Jobs once said, "insanely great!" Kudos to BBC and Adele for putting a big smile on my face this morning. And you for posting it
Just great.
As Steve Jobs once said, "insanely great!" Kudos to BBC and Adele for putting a big smile on my face this morning. And you for posting it
Just great.
No one does music interviews, music documentaries and the like better than the BBC!As Steve Jobs once said, "insanely great!" Kudos to BBC and Adele for putting a big smile on my face this morning. And you for posting it.
When are we all going to get it?
Modern big selling popular artists are recorded to sound good on an I Pod, w/dynamics flattened, and everything sounding loud. W/all the "noise" around an artist as famous as Adele, recording/sound quality just falls to the bottom of the list of priorities.
I'm afraid people who sit down to listen to music, w/out doing their listening at the same time as cooking/washing their hair/avoiding traffic, are a dying breed, and we as a'philes are nearer extinction than ever before.
I would love it if Adele and her recording people would have an inkling what we're concerned about. But they don't. I really don't think they care about sound fidelity.
If you want great recording quality w/vocalists, reach for your lp's and spin some Frankie, Ella, Sarah, Aretha, Nat etc. Just don't play any Adele, Amy, Duffy, Sam etc.
So simple, and I totally agree. Adele is a great pop artist singer for many people, including many of us, for background music, with our wives, girlfriends, friends, for cooking, for playing scrabble on Facebook, for playing chess on Twitter, for listening on the r.a.d.i.o., on our iPods, laptops, youtube videos, even @ the Royal Albert concert hall.
For audiophiles with an inclination towards the ultimate 'sublimeness', for the absolute you 'are there', with the imaging, the black backgrounds, the low level micro intonations, the dynamic range, the stuff we all love and cherish and always keep improving, the 'audiophila' apotheosis, the sitting in the middle of two loudspeakers carefully positioned after years of experimenting with every fraction of a centimeter, the toe-in with that last degree laser calibrated and perfectly sync to our own particular set of ears, and well balanced with our speaker's unique voicing, ... tra-la-la ... Adele she still is a pop singer for the pop fans and recorded by pop studio recordists, in order to climb the pop chart of the music 'palmares'.
* Billie, Sarah, Aretha, Etta, Diana, Ella, Patricia, Holly, Natalie, Cassandra, ... they aren't pop artists, they are the jazz, the blues, the soul of the female music world for the music lovers like us. ...From another breed, another ladder of raw emotional experiences with intensity @ another related spiritual communicated trance. I'm speaking for myself of course.
Adele she's for everyone else, and for some of us too. ...@ a different level of emotional quality in tandem with the caliber of the recording itself.
I love Adele, just not @ the same level as others.
___________
So simple, and I totally agree. Adele is a great pop artist singer for many people, including many of us, for background music, with our wives, girlfriends, friends, for cooking, for playing scrabble on Facebook, for playing chess on Twitter, for listening on the r.a.d.i.o., on our iPods, laptops, youtube videos, even @ the Royal Albert concert hall.
For audiophiles with an inclination towards the ultimate 'sublimeness', for the absolute you 'are there', with the imaging, the black backgrounds, the low level micro intonations, the dynamic range, the stuff we all love and cherish and always keep improving, the 'audiophila' apotheosis, the sitting in the middle of two loudspeakers carefully positioned after years of experimenting with every fraction of a centimeter, the toe-in with that last degree laser calibrated and perfectly sync to our own particular set of ears, and well balanced with our speaker's unique voicing, ... tra-la-la ... Adele she still is a pop singer for the pop fans and recorded by pop studio recordists, in order to climb the pop chart of the music 'palmares'.
* Billie, Sarah, Aretha, Etta, Diana, Ella, Patricia, Holly, Natalie, Cassandra, ... they aren't pop artists, they are the jazz, the blues, the soul of the female music world for the music lovers like us. ...From another breed, another ladder of raw emotional experiences with intensity @ another related spiritual communicated trance. I'm speaking for myself of course.
Adele she's for everyone else, and for some of us too. ...@ a different level of emotional quality in tandem with the caliber of the recording itself.
I love Adele, just not @ the same level as others.
___________
I am not sure how to take your post. First you seem awful condescending towards "pop" music. Remember several of the artist you listed started out as pop artists in their time. As far as I am concerned I wouldn't purchase any of their music save for a song here or there. I have more of an emotional reaction to Abba's "Dancing Queen" heard in my car than anything from an artist such as Diana Krall over a world class 2-channel rig.
Music is like most other "art", we like a piece, we don't like a piece or we are ambivalent. It is possible that in some instances we may dislike the end result yet we can still appreciate the effort the artist put into it. I don't select tracks to play "ultimate 'sublimeness', for the absolute you 'are there', with the imaging, the black backgrounds, the low level micro intonations, the dynamic range, the stuff we all love and cherish and always keep improving, the 'audiophila' apotheosis, the sitting in the middle of two loudspeakers carefully positioned after years of experimenting with every fraction of a centimeter, the toe-in with that last degree laser calibrated and perfectly sync to our own particular set of ears, and well balanced with our speaker's unique voicing," That is the medium not the message the artist is trying to convey.
* Billie, Sarah, Aretha, Etta, Diana, Ella, Patricia, Holly, Natalie, Cassandra, ... they aren't pop artists, they are the jazz, the blues, the soul of the female music world for the music lovers like us. ...From another breed, another ladder of raw emotional experiences with intensity @ another related spiritual communicated trance. I'm speaking for myself of course.
There's really nothing to argue about what music people enjoy or don't while its still a personal choice unless it becomes mandatory of course!
For me your list stops with Ella...
david
Billie, Sarah, Aretha, Etta, Diana, Ella, Patricia, Holly, Natalie, Cassandra, ... they aren't pop artists, they are the jazz, the blues, the soul of the female music world for the music lovers like us. ...From another breed, another ladder of raw emotional experiences with intensity @ another related spiritual communicated trance. I'm speaking for myself of course.
Adele she's for everyone else, and for some of us too. ...@ a different level of emotional quality in tandem with the caliber of the recording itself.
I love Adele, just not @ the same level as others.
still-one said:Music is like most other "art", we like a piece, we don't like a piece or we are ambivalent. It is possible that in some instances we may dislike the end result yet we can still appreciate the effort the artist put into it. I don't select tracks to play "ultimate 'sublimeness', for the absolute you 'are there', with the imaging, the black backgrounds, the low level micro intonations, the dynamic range, the stuff we all love and cherish and always keep improving, the 'audiophila' apotheosis, the sitting in the middle of two loudspeakers carefully positioned after years of experimenting with every fraction of a centimeter, the toe-in with that last degree laser calibrated and perfectly sync to our own particular set of ears, and well balanced with our speaker's unique voicing," That is the medium not the message the artist is trying to convey.
I love Ella too. but a recent purchase of 7 very early Billie Holiday monos has swayed me to Billie as my top female vocal. she has a way with a tune that touches my soul.
There's really nothing to argue about what music people enjoy or don't while its still a personal choice and/or unless it becomes mandatory of course!
For me your list stops with Ella...
david
I don't think I could personally disagree with you more. For me she is not background music. To compare her to Billie, Aretha, Etta, etc is unfair as she's just come out of the gate and has I think the potential for a great career and greatness as well. Let's do a comparison 20 or 30 years from now in all fairness. And to add, she is not a jazz/blues singer, so perhaps those artists are an apple to orange comparison.
As a second addendum, do not assume that only the artists you mentioned are for music lovers like us. If that is what you believe then you are missing out big time. Give me Joni Mitchell, Annie Lennox, Kate Bush, Rickie Lee Jones, Florence, Sarah McLachlin anytime.
Nope![]()
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |