Taiko Audio XDMS - Extreme Direct Music Server Software

John T

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2022
1,076
1,643
198
67
Or perhaps switching between Roon/NSM will accomplish the same thing?
 

Bobvin

VIP/Donor
Jun 7, 2014
1,719
3,076
665
Portland
www.purewatersystems.com
I think there’s confusion between “restart in xdms on remote”, “reboot Extreme,” simply stop and restart the stream and “stop and start xdms in Task Manager.
Indeed. Rebooting/restarting a server is generally a rare occurrence reserved for substantial changes to an application or operating system. Stopping/starting services is usually the way applications make changes to core functions/patches/updates without the need to reboot/restart the entire server. Stopping & starting services is generally programmatically achieved so an end user is oblivious.

so the question becomes what is necessary to affect the toggle for default/alternative sound profile? I expect all that is needed (considering it is a toggle) is to stop playing, make the change, and restart playing. [edit: as confirmed by Emile@Taiko, above, post #202]

That said, it is alpha level software so backend functions may not be coded yet and require some additional manual efforts.
 
Last edited:

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
Indeed. Rebooting/restarting a server is generally a rare occurrence reserved for substantial changes to an application or operating system. Stopping/starting services is usually the way applications make changes to core functions/patches/updates without the need to reboot/restart the entire server. Stopping & starting services is generally programmatically achieved so an end user is oblivious.

so the question becomes what is necessary to affect the toggle for default/alternative sound profile? I expect all that is needed (considering it is a toggle) is to stop playing, make the change, and restart playing. [edit: as confirmed by Emile@Taiko, above, post #202]

That said, it is alpha level software so backend functions may not be coded yet and require some additional manual efforts.
When you toggle the switch it’s effective from the next track you play. Stop track, toggle, play again accomplishes the same thing.
 

oldmustang

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2012
1,072
3,177
1,445
XDMS Control App version 2.3.10 DAC settings has X0,1,2 and 3 selection working correctly, so no need to edit by hand anymore
How do each of those adaptive setting differ from each other? What are they actually? Are these the "USB1, USB 2, USB 3, USB 4" profiles with individual icons on the Extreme desktop, or are these X0, 1, 2, 3 settings something different?

Steve Z
 

oldmustang

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2012
1,072
3,177
1,445
When you toggle the switch it’s effective from the next track you play. Stop track, toggle, play again accomplishes the same thing.
Thank you, Emile. I'm glad to have the definitive answer.

With 18 speculative posts appearing on three pages of this thread it's obvious that audiophiles have no patience whatsoever.

Steve Z
 

EuroDriver

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2015
927
2,486
450
Monaco
Maybe that was in a previous version of XDMS server/control app?? Now it clearly works by just stopping the music, toggling and replaying. The difference is quite audible between default and alternaopa

When you toggle the switch it’s effective from the next track you play. Stop track, toggle, play again accomplishes the same thing.
This is the way it is supposed to work, but being a bit of a Belt, Braces and Suspenders kind of person, I suggested to Steve to restart XDMS to be absolutely sure
 

cat6man

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2013
913
1,050
1,185
west of NYC, east of SF
Thank you, Emile. I'm glad to have the definitive answer.

With 18 speculative posts appearing on three pages of this thread it's obvious that audiophiles have no patience whatsoever.

Steve Z

Or we think we know it all?
 

Moladiego

Active Member
May 30, 2022
65
111
38
54
I have tried alternative and I clearly prefer default. More 3d and layered.
I second your opinion. Default is more natural, layered and airier. Alternative is more in-your-face and two-dimensional, reminding me somewhat of the difference between the latest Roon upgrade (a kind of "whitish" or "blanched" feel to the sound) and classic XDMS (more natural and airier; even before NSM). The difference is subtle though.
 

an.vamv

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2014
29
20
298
I am reading that many members are raving about the recent backend update for Qobuz SQ. I did get an uptick but not to the same degree as others. I felt there was more clarity and better defined deep bass but I am in "alternative". I was just curious if those finding a bigger improvement inSQ are in "default"or in "alternative"
I also had the latest server update related to Qobuz SQ installed recently and i can also confirm that Qobuz now sounds to my ears smoother and more analogue than before . The streaming sound quality is on par with SSD playback in my system. My preference even before doing the upgrade has been Alternative profile as it sounds more transparent to my ears. As per Ed it does less pre processing than default and as the noise floor in our systems becomes lower, preference of people tends to swing to alternative.
 

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
Ed explained to me why I noticed a different uptick in SQ than others. When Ed did my Dec 29th backend update, initially I found the sound was not as good as what I was hearing. Ed then did something that I watched as he was in the bowels of my Extreme.....this was when he changed my adaptive format from 3 to a 1 and immediately the uptick SQ was there like I was expecting. I could not understand what he did that changed the sound so much. He told me ( and I hope I quote him correctly) that Taiko has found the best bit depth sampling rate to be 16 and apparently using adaptive format at '1" essentially makes a 24/192 file a 16/192 file and it sounded amazing. So my big uptick was when he changed my adaptive format to 1. Apparently all others who received the Jan 10 Qobuz update also received adaptive format 1....this is my understanding. So in essence had I received that on Jan 10 and not Dec 29 I would ave experienced the same uptick in SQ.....bottom line is "it's all good"
 

Tesuka

Well-Known Member
Feb 7, 2021
8
33
80
49
Ed, magic fingers, solved my reading problems with NSM... and in 1 hour I was able to fully enjoy this amazing sound experience... Sound stage of astonishing breadth and precision, bass and transcended highs, everything is there:)
Really a big shout out to the magic Taiko Team.
 

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
I second your opinion. Default is more natural, layered and airier. Alternative is more in-your-face and two-dimensional, reminding me somewhat of the difference between the latest Roon upgrade (a kind of "whitish" or "blanched" feel to the sound) and classic XDMS (more natural and airier; even before NSM). The difference is subtle though.
I have to admit that just like @Rhapsody i’ve spent the past 2 days listening to both default as well as alternative in Sound Profile. I have to agree that there is merit in your post and yes it is a close call. I do agree that with many files and in “ alternative” there is just too much and as a result the sound stage is pushed forward and does indeed sound 2D.This isn’t with all songs but is noticeable when heard. This also seems to vary in degree depending on what is being played. I do find a slightly set back presentation with a bit more air in default but after almost 2 days it is close. However in many of the songs that I use as demo the issue is mote of an in your face presentation. Plus I listen nearfield. The good news is there is no right answer but rather comes down to system dependence and personal preference The interesting caveat is that I have gone back to default as I’m rather enjoying it. I’m saving alternative for several files that do well with it.
 

Rhapsody

VIP/Donor
Jan 16, 2013
3,470
6,558
2,535
Brooklyn NY
Rhapsody.Audio
Totally system dependent. Every time someone comments about the SP setting I go and check it, back and forth, back and forth. In the system that I am checking it on, with the speakers 10' out in the room I get a full 3D holographic soundstage with either setting. If you are not getting a 3D, layered soundstage with one of the settings then there is a strange interaction going on with your system with the setting that is giving you 2D sound, which is very possible.

In this system that I am going back and forth on I get a sense more air and space "feeling" with alternative but when I switch to Defualt I could easily leave it there as I definitely don't have 2D Sound. I don't know how many systems that I have, but I don't have 2D sound on any of them. If I did there is something wrong somewhere other than the Sound Profile setting.

My comments relate to my system/room etc, nothing to do with other people's systems. Also personal preference is involved as well.

I do not think that one can generalize and say that one setting has global sonic results. Again, totally system dependent imho.
 

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
2D is somewhat harsh. What I detect is much deeper and solid bass and a louder fuller sound . I find the sound stage is 3D but further forward. I can see the singers vocal cords. There is nothing wrong with my system Right now it is so close but I’m back on default for a while
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rhapsody

Rhapsody

VIP/Donor
Jan 16, 2013
3,470
6,558
2,535
Brooklyn NY
Rhapsody.Audio
Steve, I was not referring to you saying your system sounded 2D, someone else mentioned that on Alternative it was 2D sounding.

I am listening now on Default now and it sounds great. But Alt sounds really good to me as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steve Williams

Moladiego

Active Member
May 30, 2022
65
111
38
54
Totally system dependent. Every time someone comments about the SP setting I go and check it, back and forth, back and forth. In the system that I am checking it on, with the speakers 10' out in the room I get a full 3D holographic soundstage with either setting. If you are not getting a 3D, layered soundstage with one of the settings then there is a strange interaction going on with your system with the setting that is giving you 2D sound, which is very possible.

In this system that I am going back and forth on I get a sense more air and space "feeling" with alternative but when I switch to Defualt I could easily leave it there as I definitely don't have 2D Sound. I don't know how many systems that I have, but I don't have 2D sound on any of them. If I did there is something wrong somewhere other than the Sound Profile setting.

My comments relate to my system/room etc, nothing to do with other people's systems. Also personal preference is involved as well.

I do not think that one can generalize and say that one setting has global sonic results. Again, totally system dependent imho.
Yes, system or personal preference dependent. I did not mean to suggest that Default is 3D and Alternative is 2D. The difference is (very) subtle between the two modes, but a more apt description would be like applying normal lens setting (Default) and applying zoom setting (Alternative) in photography, the latter bringing the sound forward a bit, but at the expense of losing a bit of depth or layering structure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rhapsody

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
Yes, system or personal preference dependent. I did not mean to suggest that Default is 3D and Alternative is 2D. The difference is (very) subtle between the two modes, but a more apt description would be like applying normal lens setting (Default) and applying zoom setting (Alternative) in photography, the latter bringing the sound forward a bit, but at the expense of losing a bit of depth or layering structure.
That is exactly how I would describe it. Yet like Bob says it is so close that I will likely use both depending on the file I play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rhapsody

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing