Thanks..I ruled out network box cables. There isn't another cable I would rather have than Valhalla this side of Odin.
I wouldn't dismiss them so quickly
Thanks..I ruled out network box cables. There isn't another cable I would rather have than Valhalla this side of Odin.
Christian, I think that Nordost makes the best range of speaker cabling on the market today. Your description of what you hear with the Valhalla's is pretty similar to my experience with my Frey's. One of the issues that has been a factor with Nordost cabling in the past is that IF one's system isn't properly dialed in, I believe that this cabling will highlight any faults up stream. I'm sure that those who have decried Nordost are simply hearing what their system is doing wrong and incorrectly laying the blame on the cables. Enjoy your Valhalla, IMO a MUCH better cable than your second choice.
+1.
I've the same experience. After demoed a lot of top brands of cable, I consider Nordost my personal reference that with my audio gears is a perfect match.
Have you listened to the recent TYR 2?
Hi Brian
Most of us who use Valhalla aren't keen on using cables that have a switching box such as used on MIT or Transparent as IMO it changes the signal.
Have you listened to the recent TYR 2?
Hi Brian
Most of us who use Valhalla aren't keen on using cables that have a switching box such as used on MIT or Transparent as IMO it changes the signal.
Hi Brian
Most of us who use Valhalla aren't keen on using cables that have a switching box such as used on MIT or Transparent as IMO it changes the signal.
Steve,
I have large experience with Vallalha's and Transparent MM2, both OPUS and Reference XL types, and IMHO the Valhalla cables change the signal (in the good way) as much as the Transparent one's. But in a different way.
I don't disagree with you Myles. I've had Transparent Opus in my system and frankly I preferred Valhalla. I also played with some Odin IC's in my system and TBH after looking at the cost for an all Odin system in my room would be way over $100K I remain immensely content with my Valhalla.
Now, if ALL cables alter the signal I get a little miffed when people say that what they hear is completely neutral
One of the things that Roy Gregory advocated while he was at HiFi+ was using the same brand of cable throughout. I'm sure he was not the only one who did so (and I realize both his fondness for Nordost and his eventual involvement in the company itself). I'm a little mystified how a cable could be judged in isolation in it is not part of an overall system using the same cable (or tiers within the same brand).
Granted, you may be able to isolate what a particular cable is doing or not doing to the sound, but is it a fair way to assess the performance of the cable if it is conceived, but not fully implemented as a 'system'?
AHC talked about the pros and cons of mixing and matching cables years before in TAS He ws definitely for the same cable throughout the system.
I've had a few manufacturers like K-S ask me to listen with an all K-S system including PCs. Not always though.
This was the pre-Scud AHC? Yep, I'm using the K-S and Joe K was pretty emphatic about the difference it would make.
BTW, still working on that recipe, Myles.
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |