I'm sure they are connected...I am not sure what one thing has to do with the other . I am not saying a word about Taiko all I am saying is the numbers that were posted are really not correct.
Ron will be reading a lot of private messages...
I'm sure they are connected...I am not sure what one thing has to do with the other . I am not saying a word about Taiko all I am saying is the numbers that were posted are really not correct.
those 'Off-Islander Audio Society' guys mentioned in the review will be here in my room for a visit next week........Specially for those coming to this thread to learn about the dCS Varese:
https://www.moremusic.nl/reviews/dcs/Varese/dCS-Varese-Stereophile.pdf
Hi Amir, can you please elaborate on the Wadax strategy? I am still trying to figure out what is unique or different about them other than the looks of their boxes and a few guys calling them "BEST".I like wadax strategy, Wadax studio is available for best performance to price ratio.
No need to think about dCS or Taiko.
I think Wadax strategy is winner in this market
This is an hobby that in some aspect is dependent on confirmation bias. IMO the keyword for the high-end is preference. Preference assumes the will of the listener to appreciate and enjoy some type of sound. Many other factors create negative and positive bias in us - the audiophile is a complex being!
But yes, WhatsPreferredForum is a boring name ...
*You* introduced vinyl as the straw man here to move the discussion away from the DAC. Fine, but it's a transparent tactic...Your bringing up of the dichotomy mathematical vs physical problem is the distraction.
*You* introduced vinyl as the straw man here to move the discussion away from the DAC. Fine, but it's a transparent tactic...
It seems unlikely that we'll find any common ground here, so let's move on.
A great way to overcome confirmation bias in this hobby is to compare and contrast gear.
If I recall correctly, you are not in favor of that approach.
I guess you would rather trust an expert or a mis-incetivized indivudual to push their crap, accept it, and assume their preference it will move you emotionally. That logic Makes ZERO sense to me....
Yet by comparing, people can become aware of the trade-offs and choices they are making... Explicitly enumerating the differences, people can know if they are making the right decision - for their preference.
And yes, I am in agreement with you on "WhatsPreferredForum", or even better, Whats-Preferred-by-a Herd-Forum![]()
the word 'just' is so open-ended. maybe you are referring to measurements? i'm just guessing.Sorry, compare and contrast is what I do all the time. But I deeply disagree with just assessing gear in A/B direct comparisons in the same system.
which is what is in the end most important. how it works to our ears in our own system. it's not the whole picture, but the heart of the matter.In such conditions we are mostly assessing system combability.
the bigger risk is never trying to get our own good answer and just taking someone else's word for things. that can be costly.An interesting game, but we risk never knowing the real capabilities of gear.
Caesar,Hi Amir, can you please elaborate on the Wadax strategy? I am still trying to figure out what is unique or different about them other than the looks of their boxes and a few guys calling them "BEST".
I wouldn't be surprised if the wadax streamer beat the pants of the taiko olympus in a head to head comparison, but there is a huge herd of audiophiles who ordering the olympus just because other people are. Ditto for dcs
the word 'just' is so open-ended. maybe you are referring to measurements? i'm just guessing.
not every A/B compare in the same system is equally valid. but subjectively many are very valid and the best we can possibly do as non scientists.
this is a hobby and we don't need to have scientific rigor. we ought to have a method that we enjoy and that results in a reasonable outcome. it takes practice and extended time. it is a serious thing.
typically most serious hifi A/B compares in the same system are in cases where there is already some experience in other systems with the same gear. so there is that extra experience to be another case for evidence. or inside a system there are alternate ways to view the gear. we do have to use the tools we have the best we can. multiple sources and formats are useful as a reference.
the bigger risk is never trying to get our own good answer and just taking someone else's word for things. that can be costly.
it does help to have a mature system that is based on musical truth. which is lots of work to get to, but worth it.
so we mostly agree about these things.I am just addressing subjective listening - simply our own preference.
Not measurements or science, but I surely use what I learn from science to valuate the methodology and the conditions of the test.
Practice and extended time - just my main points. A/B compares seldom happen during a long time - only crazy audiophiles keep three amplifiers during many months or years to evaluate and keep them(I kept four to avoid being considered crazy
). Practice means you know that with top high-end gear you have to optimize the whole system, not just put the unit in it and listen.
Oh, now we in "serious" A/B compares ... The 5% of all compares ...
An assumed risk in the hobby. We can't listen to everything. Sure we have to weight opinions and merge all of them. I do it every time and even wrote on my weighting method.
one man's XXX is another man's XXX.Musical truth? An alternative version of "natural"?![]()
...or XVX as the case may be.one man's XXX is another man's XXX
and how is that established? more like live compared to which other sources? if we are using that hyperbole as fact.If the Varese offers the closest thing yet compared to live
depends on who is claiming the live territory and what else they have had in for compare. the dCS Vivaldi Apex? don't drag Wadax into that equation.(1) then what is the Wadax?
not by me. and i am saying that in a relative sense. everything sounds like vinyl to one degree or another. but adding distortion to a digital signal at the top of the food chain is not helping so far in my experience. but a good fit for many ears and systems and tube rolling preferences.If Ron likes tubes and tubes are often likened to vinyl
sure.then how do we reconcile that the Horizon sounds more like tubes compared to the Wadax but the Wadax is closest to vinyl per Mike?
My point is just that,
a) this does all come down to tastes
agree. all reproduction has an element of taste and attempts to sound real in some form or fashion.b) NONE of these DACs is truly just a replication of live or whatever. They ALL have a sonic signature or 'voicing' to them
none taken.Declaration: I think the Wadax is awesome! It's one of, if not THE, best DACs on the planet! (in other words please don't read this as a shot at the Wadax!)
(1) per Jacob H review - also a bit of interpretation here trying to wade through the somewhat complex verbiage he uses
*Note for Jacob H: Hemingway believed that clear communication is paramount, and that complex language can obscure meaning.
and how is that established? more like live compared to which other sources? if we are using that hyperbole as fact.
not exactly established. when Jacob names names of which sources he is assigning sounding live compared to. i will attach appropriate weight to it (only skimmed his review, not really digested it yet).
per JH@theabsolutesound
i did just now go to Jacob's review and look closely for direct compares to vinyl. there are none even though he has two super uber turntables in his system.
per JH@theabsolutesound
not exactly established. when Jacob names names of which sources he is assigning sounding live compared to. i will attach appropriate weight to it (only skimmed his review, not really digested it yet)
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |