dCS Varese short review

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am not sure what one thing has to do with the other . I am not saying a word about Taiko all I am saying is the numbers that were posted are really not correct.
I'm sure they are connected...
Ron will be reading a lot of private messages...
 
I like wadax strategy, Wadax studio is available for best performance to price ratio.

No need to think about dCS or Taiko.

I think Wadax strategy is winner in this market
 
Last edited:
I like wadax strategy, Wadax studio is available for best performance to price ratio.

No need to think about dCS or Taiko.

I think Wadax strategy is winner in this market
Hi Amir, can you please elaborate on the Wadax strategy? I am still trying to figure out what is unique or different about them other than the looks of their boxes and a few guys calling them "BEST".

I wouldn't be surprised if the wadax streamer beat the pants of the taiko olympus in a head to head comparison, but there is a huge herd of audiophiles who ordering the olympus just because other people are. Ditto for dcs
 
This is an hobby that in some aspect is dependent on confirmation bias. IMO the keyword for the high-end is preference. Preference assumes the will of the listener to appreciate and enjoy some type of sound. Many other factors create negative and positive bias in us - the audiophile is a complex being! ;)

But yes, WhatsPreferredForum is a boring name ...

A great way to overcome confirmation bias in this hobby is to compare and contrast gear. If I recall correctly, you are not in favor of that approach. I guess you would rather trust an expert or a mis-incetivized indivudual to push their crap, accept it, and assume their preference it will move you emotionally. That logic Makes ZERO sense to me....

Yet by comparing, people can become aware of the trade-offs and choices they are making... Explicitly enumerating the differences, people can know if they are making the right decision - for their preference.

And yes, I am in agreement with you on "WhatsPreferredForum", or even better, Whats-Preferred-by-a Herd-Forum :):):)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sujay
Your bringing up of the dichotomy mathematical vs physical problem is the distraction.
*You* introduced vinyl as the straw man here to move the discussion away from the DAC. Fine, but it's a transparent tactic...

It seems unlikely that we'll find any common ground here, so let's move on.
 
*You* introduced vinyl as the straw man here to move the discussion away from the DAC. Fine, but it's a transparent tactic...

Obviously, those who understand the validity of my argument will disagree that it's a "tactic".

It seems unlikely that we'll find any common ground here, so let's move on.

Sounds good to me.
 
A great way to overcome confirmation bias in this hobby is to compare and contrast gear.

Surely.

If I recall correctly, you are not in favor of that approach.

Sorry, compare and contrast is what I do all the time. But I deeply disagree with just assessing gear in A/B direct comparisons in the same system. In such conditions we are mostly assessing system combability. An interesting game, but we risk never knowing the real capabilities of gear.

I guess you would rather trust an expert or a mis-incetivized indivudual to push their crap, accept it, and assume their preference it will move you emotionally. That logic Makes ZERO sense to me....

You should get a WBF nomination for wrong guesses and speculation. And probably read a little more of this forum before answering to posts. I know your main purpose is insulting and denigrating the high-end industry, but it becomes tiresome.

Yet by comparing, people can become aware of the trade-offs and choices they are making... Explicitly enumerating the differences, people can know if they are making the right decision - for their preference.

Yes, correctly comparing is useful.

And yes, I am in agreement with you on "WhatsPreferredForum", or even better, Whats-Preferred-by-a Herd-Forum :):):)

You really do not understand what is high-end audio ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: wil and Al M.
Sorry, compare and contrast is what I do all the time. But I deeply disagree with just assessing gear in A/B direct comparisons in the same system.
the word 'just' is so open-ended. maybe you are referring to measurements? i'm just guessing.

not every A/B compare in the same system is equally valid. but subjectively many are very valid and the best we can possibly do as non scientists. this is a hobby and we don't need to have scientific rigor. A/B compares are imperfectly perfect. we should embrace them. we ought to have a method that we enjoy and that results in a reasonable outcome. it takes practice and extended time. it is a serious thing. we have to have a bit of skepticism too and push for the truth. maybe get extra ears for major questions.

typically most serious hifi A/B compares in the same system are in cases where there is already some experience in other systems with the same gear. so there is that extra experience to be another case for evidence. or inside a system there are alternate ways to view the gear. we do have to use the tools we have the best we can. multiple sources and formats are useful as a reference.
In such conditions we are mostly assessing system combability.
which is what is in the end most important. how it works to our ears in our own system. it's not the whole picture, but the heart of the matter.

but i reject the notion that our conclusions are mainly about system compatibility. while it is possible, it can be not true too. we can get to a level of objectivity about conclusions across many types of systems. it takes vetting of your system over time.
An interesting game, but we risk never knowing the real capabilities of gear.
the bigger risk is never trying to get our own good answer and just taking someone else's word for things. that can be costly.

it does help to have a mature system that is based on musical truth. which is lots of work to get to, but worth it.
 
Last edited:
Hi Amir, can you please elaborate on the Wadax strategy? I am still trying to figure out what is unique or different about them other than the looks of their boxes and a few guys calling them "BEST".

I wouldn't be surprised if the wadax streamer beat the pants of the taiko olympus in a head to head comparison, but there is a huge herd of audiophiles who ordering the olympus just because other people are. Ditto for dcs
Caesar,
There are always reasons people buy what they do and also why they support some products over others. Some of those reasons may even be the sound however they are only a part of the story.
I know you are into marketing and the marketing, advertising, and various other factors play a huge roll in choosing. I can tell you that very few if any people ever came into my business and said I want a _____________ and bought it. ( I am talking about things like a Wadax, dCS etc.) These devices need to be experienced to some degree and then people use their senses to decide. BTW Audiophiles are not the only ones that buy LOL
Wadax has been clear in their design criteria, its right there on their website however they do not do the same things that Taiko has done here on WBF or the same type of plan as dCS. These are three different companies doing things their own way. You may like it , you may not but it isn''t our choice except of whether we enjoy it and want to own their gear.
Everyone that gets involved with quality audio usually has an AH HAH moment. That experience is usually a time when someone realizes that there are things in the world they have never seen, heard, enjoyed, tasted etc. These can be life changing. They were for me.
 
the word 'just' is so open-ended. maybe you are referring to measurements? i'm just guessing.

not every A/B compare in the same system is equally valid. but subjectively many are very valid and the best we can possibly do as non scientists.

I am just addressing subjective listening - simply our own preference.
Not measurements or science, but I surely use what I learn from science to valuate the methodology and the conditions of the test.

this is a hobby and we don't need to have scientific rigor. we ought to have a method that we enjoy and that results in a reasonable outcome. it takes practice and extended time. it is a serious thing.

Practice and extended time - just my main points. A/B compares seldom happen during a long time - only crazy audiophiles keep three amplifiers during many months or years to evaluate and keep them ;) (I kept four to avoid being considered crazy :eek: ). Practice means you know that with top high-end gear you have to optimize the whole system, not just put the unit in it and listen.

typically most serious hifi A/B compares in the same system are in cases where there is already some experience in other systems with the same gear. so there is that extra experience to be another case for evidence. or inside a system there are alternate ways to view the gear. we do have to use the tools we have the best we can. multiple sources and formats are useful as a reference.

Oh, now we in "serious" A/B compares ... The 5% of all compares ...

the bigger risk is never trying to get our own good answer and just taking someone else's word for things. that can be costly.

An assumed risk in the hobby. We can't listen to everything. Sure we have to weight opinions and merge all of them. I do it every time and even wrote on my weighting method.

it does help to have a mature system that is based on musical truth. which is lots of work to get to, but worth it.

Musical truth? An alternative version of "natural"? ;)
 
I am just addressing subjective listening - simply our own preference.
Not measurements or science, but I surely use what I learn from science to valuate the methodology and the conditions of the test.

Practice and extended time - just my main points. A/B compares seldom happen during a long time - only crazy audiophiles keep three amplifiers during many months or years to evaluate and keep them ;) (I kept four to avoid being considered crazy :eek: ). Practice means you know that with top high-end gear you have to optimize the whole system, not just put the unit in it and listen.

Oh, now we in "serious" A/B compares ... The 5% of all compares ...

An assumed risk in the hobby. We can't listen to everything. Sure we have to weight opinions and merge all of them. I do it every time and even wrote on my weighting method.
so we mostly agree about these things.
Musical truth? An alternative version of "natural"? ;)
one man's XXX is another man's XXX. :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: microstrip
On a somewhat related note....

I am very curious to hear the upcoming MSB Sentinel. It will be quite interesting to compare and contrast the Wadax v dCS Varese v MSB Sentinel. I suspect that the MSB will come out very strong. But, shortly after that the Wadax will offer and update - maybe Level 5 and the Varese will offer an Apex-like update but software focused.
 
If the Varese offers the closest thing yet compared to live(1) then what is the Wadax? If Ron likes tubes and tubes are often likened to vinyl then how do we reconcile that the Horizon sounds more like tubes compared to the Wadax but the Wadax is closest to vinyl per Mike?

My point is just that,
a) this does all come down to tastes
b) NONE of these DACs is truly just a replication of live or whatever. They ALL have a sonic signature or 'voicing' to them

Declaration: I think the Wadax is awesome! It's one of, if not THE, best DACs on the planet! (in other words please don't read this as a shot at the Wadax!)

(1) per Jacob H review - also a bit of interpretation here trying to wade through the somewhat complex verbiage he uses
*Note for Jacob H: Hemingway believed that clear communication is paramount, and that complex language can obscure meaning.
 
If the Varese offers the closest thing yet compared to live
and how is that established? more like live compared to which other sources? if we are using that hyperbole as fact.
(1) then what is the Wadax?
depends on who is claiming the live territory and what else they have had in for compare. the dCS Vivaldi Apex? don't drag Wadax into that equation.
If Ron likes tubes and tubes are often likened to vinyl
not by me. and i am saying that in a relative sense. everything sounds like vinyl to one degree or another. but adding distortion to a digital signal at the top of the food chain is not helping so far in my experience. but a good fit for many ears and systems and tube rolling preferences.
then how do we reconcile that the Horizon sounds more like tubes compared to the Wadax but the Wadax is closest to vinyl per Mike?

My point is just that,
a) this does all come down to tastes
sure.
b) NONE of these DACs is truly just a replication of live or whatever. They ALL have a sonic signature or 'voicing' to them
agree. all reproduction has an element of taste and attempts to sound real in some form or fashion.
Declaration: I think the Wadax is awesome! It's one of, if not THE, best DACs on the planet! (in other words please don't read this as a shot at the Wadax!)

(1) per Jacob H review - also a bit of interpretation here trying to wade through the somewhat complex verbiage he uses
*Note for Jacob H: Hemingway believed that clear communication is paramount, and that complex language can obscure meaning.
none taken.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pk_LA
not exactly established. when Jacob names names of which sources he is assigning sounding live compared to. i will attach appropriate weight to it (only skimmed his review, not really digested it yet).

understand i hold the Varese in the highest regard and i might prefer it to my Wadax. but in system direct compares matter to me. the new Varese review in Stereophile has zero in system compares other than references to the Vivaldi Apex (he did not want to have to switch cables.....not exactly digging in to get the info). the reviewer does not do vinyl or tape. nice review but how much use can it be? not that i don't appreciate what effort was given. too bad Fremer is not still at Stereophile and could have compared the Varese to his vinyl. now that would get my attention. would dCS want that? not sure.

this is where i come from. source to source and format to format in system comparing. allows for true references over time. not perfect, but what we have that we can go and check any time, truth to the degree it can be found.

when i say that the Wadax does sound like my vinyl, i am very serious about it, and understand what that means. 'live' is a nebulous term. can't A/B live in system.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pk_LA
i did just now go to Jacob's review and look closely for direct compares to vinyl. there are none even though he has two super uber turntables in his system.

he does refer to vinyl often in his review. but zero descriptions of an A/B. clearly he thinks it's a worthy standard. yet my guess is that it was hands-off to do a direct compare.

there is a pattern here i think.
not exactly established. when Jacob names names of which sources he is assigning sounding live compared to. i will attach appropriate weight to it (only skimmed his review, not really digested it yet)
 
  • Like
Reactions: pk_LA
Status
Not open for further replies.

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing