DSD 256fs and beyond.....

Bruce B

WBF Founding Member, Pro Audio Production Member
Apr 25, 2010
7,007
515
1,740
Snohomish, WA
www.pugetsoundstudios.com
Much ballyhoo has been written about the new availability of being able to capture sound at 11.2MHz There have been a few files trickling around the internet touting native DSD256fs but in reality, all we've seen are files that have been upsampled.
A few months ago 5/4 Productions captured the first commercial recording in DSD256fs, but as I recall, this was just from a back-up unit. The "real" recording was done at DSD64fs.

There are a couple of DAC's and even a couple of ADC's that can pass native DSD256fs. One being the Horus, though this could only be done for the first time just a couple of months ago. The exaSound DAC and the Ayre QA-9 can operate up to DS256fs as well.

So, is DSD256fs all that it's cracked up to be? From what I've heard and read so far, not really. I can not tell the difference between DSD128fs and DSD256fs. I've tried and failed. Either I have tin ears, or some people have expectation bias. DSD256fs was developed to better facilitate Post Production. Long has been the problem of HF build-up working in DSD, especially using multi-track. DSD256fs pushes that HF noise up another octave so multi-track recordings will have a better chance at staying under the Scarlet book specs for HF noise.

In my studio, using music recorded from tape and location, I still think the Grimm AD1 at DSD64fs and the Horus at DSD128fs are the best DSD recording available. Which you prefer is up for debate. What I will be doing is taking my Pyramix/Horus unit to RMAF and you can listen for yourself what DSD you like the best. For me, I'll still hang on to my Grimm....
 

cjfrbw

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
3,361
1,355
1,730
Pleasanton, CA
I seem to remember the lady engineer at CAS 2013 stating that the 256f advantage was for editing purposes, mainly.
 

Bruce B

WBF Founding Member, Pro Audio Production Member
Apr 25, 2010
7,007
515
1,740
Snohomish, WA
www.pugetsoundstudios.com
Yes, that is correct. I see so many posts over at CA and SA-CD.net stating that DSD256fs sounds so much better than 64/128fs (night/day... whatever adjetive you want). That's hogwash! DSD128fs and DSD256fs are essentially the same exact file with just the ultra high frequency changing. DSD256fs was developed to get around the problems associated with multi-track mixing and such.
 

tailspn

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2011
169
0
921
Yes, that is correct. I see so many posts over at CA and SA-CD.net stating that DSD256fs sounds so much better than 64/128fs (night/day... whatever adjetive you want). That's hogwash!

Hey Bruce,


It would be interesting to see you post this over there, it would drive them nuts!

AND THANKS!

Tom
 

Bruce B

WBF Founding Member, Pro Audio Production Member
Apr 25, 2010
7,007
515
1,740
Snohomish, WA
www.pugetsoundstudios.com
Hey Bruce,


It would be interesting to see you post this over there, it would drive them nuts!

AND THANKS!

Tom

I've been banned at CA and Zeus has a pretty tight reign at SA-CD. You don't think I've been beat up enough already?? :p
 

tailspn

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2011
169
0
921
In retrospect, you're absolutely right. Why spoil the party. DSD has been so maligned in the past with falsehoods and technical ignorance, it deserves some breathing room until greater studio adoption produces greater broad based content.
 

tailspn

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2011
169
0
921
Bruce no doubt told the truth

Stephen Best, owner of sa-cd.net has several site rules. One of which is there will be NO discussion tolerated about ripping SACD's. Bruce commented once that it not only can be accomplished, but he did so professionally, and detailed the hardware used. Blammo, instant ban!
 

Bruce B

WBF Founding Member, Pro Audio Production Member
Apr 25, 2010
7,007
515
1,740
Snohomish, WA
www.pugetsoundstudios.com
Stephen Best, owner of sa-cd.net has several site rules. One of which is there will be NO discussion tolerated about ripping SACD's. Bruce commented once that it not only can be accomplished, but he did so professionally, and detailed the hardware used. Blammo, instant ban!

And also, I had just spoken to Claude Cellier at CES when he came to my room explaining to me about the Emotion architecture and also about the Mykerinos cards that Chris C. had over at CA. When I tried to "correct" Chris and explain what Claude had told me.... Blammo.... again!

I guess just as well.... I took a pretty hard beating over there when the HDtracks fiasco started up.
 

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
And also, I had just spoken to Claude Cellier at CES when he came to my room explaining to me about the Emotion architecture and also about the Mykerinos cards that Chris C. had over at CA. When I tried to "correct" Chris and explain what Claude had told me.... Blammo.... again!

I guess just as well.... I took a pretty hard beating over there when the HDtracks fiasco started up.

you're safe here with us Bruce ;)
 

Julf

New Member
Nov 27, 2011
613
0
0
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
I guess just as well.... I took a pretty hard beating over there when the HDtracks fiasco started up.

Ah, yes. I am sure you are glad to know that they have mostly moved away from spectrograms (relying on your ears rather than spectrograms is a good idea, but preferably the conclusion should be "if even an upsampling sounds really good, maybe that hi-res thing isn't so important" rather than "even if your numbers and graphs claim it is an upsampling, my ears tell me that it clearly isn't"), and now seem obsessed with measuring dynamic range :)
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,807
4,702
2,790
Portugal
I can honestly say that I've personally learned a lot from your threads here Bruce.

Kudos

Also learned a lot, and enjoyed most of his posts. He is one our real experts.
 

Nevillekapadia

VIP/Donor
Aug 30, 2010
231
27
933
I would say the same for Bruce too. His knowledge, experience and industry credentials are tops in my books.
 

Bruce B

WBF Founding Member, Pro Audio Production Member
Apr 25, 2010
7,007
515
1,740
Snohomish, WA
www.pugetsoundstudios.com
For anyone interested, I'll be playing DSD256fs tape transfers at RMAF in room 8000, JPS Labs. You'll be able to hear finer details with the Abyss Headphones.

I believe this may be the first show where native DSD256fs files are played!
 

mep

Member Sponsor & WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
9,481
17
0
I'm looking forward to it Bruce.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing