Transparent vs MIT

[MadFloyd]

Are there basic 'house sound' differences between these two brands of networked cables?

 

[Imperial]

Are there basic 'house sound' differences between these two brands of networked cables?

--

Transparent tech lingo: http://www.hifi-advice.com/transparent-filtering-info.html

--

M.I T cables Tech Lingo: http://thecarversite.com/yetanotherforum/default.aspx?g=posts&t=2463
So the M.I.T lingo that says: "Poles of articulation" should be more easy to understand as a result..
If you understand these two technical articles, you have a slight insight on the house sound, of the two brands.

--

Speakers and amps and speaker cables make up a "circuit" so this is not a differentiation carved in stone, more of a guideline, you could say.

Imperial.

 

[JackD201]

In the lower lines, the Transparents to me are more neutral than MITs which have more of a midrange emphasis. When it comes to the top of the line models, neither really sounds like anything. I like that. Unfortunately these cost small fortunes.