I used the DartZeel supplied 50 ohm cable (10m) and currently I am using a Kimber KS1036 XLR XLR 6m long between the REF40 and the NHB 108. The appearance of the Audio Research REF phono 2 was was one the reasons I reverted to ARC - at that time I felt that I preferred the Phono2. The REF5 was in my view different, but not better than the DartZeel. But the REF Anniversary seemed to be a reasonable jump.
AFAIK, one owner of an NHB 458 also owns an ARC Phono 2 REF SE, but keeps the NH18NS.
But honestly, there's some ss gear that I could live with. Just as long as it's not zippy, transistory, thin, mechanical and washed out sounding. Just in the end, find that tubes bring me closer to the holy grail.
I used the DartZeel supplied 50 ohm cable (10m) and currently I am using a Kimber KS1036 XLR XLR 6m long between the REF40 and the NHB 108. The appearance of the Audio Research REF phono 2 was was one the reasons I reverted to ARC - at that time I felt that I preferred the Phono2. The REF5 was in my view different, but not better than the DartZeel. But the REF Anniversary seemed to be a reasonable jump.
AFAIK, one owner of an NHB 458 also owns an ARC Phono 2 REF SE, but keeps the NH18NS.
Mike,
Most probably - but I did not have access to other BNC cables . I also found that DartZeel equipment is very dependent on cable quality. I listened to great sounds with Transparent Reference MM2, Odin and Kubala Sosna ELations speaker cables, but a few expensive cables that I will keep incognito could make the great sounding NHB108 sound miserable in my system.
I think they lost their way after the Ref 3, personally. In fact, I bet the Ref 3 still sounds pretty amazing compared to these latest jewels--which just add a separate power supply and more energy storage for double and triple the cost.
I can tell you the LS17 is no box of chocolates. I bought two of them with the last time after I bought the ARC VS115 thinking it would be a great match. Wrong. The Krell KBL smokes the LS17 in every parameter that means a damn thing to me. More neutral, more quiet, better bass response, faster, tighter, and on and on.
The funny thing was the LS17 was much easier to sell than the ARC VS115 even though the price differential was small on the used market. The ARC VS115 is a much better amp than the LS17 is a preamp. I’m beginning to think the reason people shy away from the VS115 isn’t the sound, but rather the open-air chassis.
The only tube amps that really (!) impressed me were the Zanden monos and pre I heard at a Magico Q7 / dCS show last week . Said a Spectral owner....
Now .. where did I put that plane ticket so that I can go away before my house is bombed by a bunch of tubey lovers.
I'll only go into the analog side since when I heard the system, the Burmester music server was brand new. The analog front end was the Graham Phantom with Benz LP-S mounted on the top of the line Avid table. The preamplifier/phono were also top of the line Burmester and the system was wired with top of the line Wireworld IC and speaker cables. (sorry I don't remember the models ).
I'll only go into the analog side since when I heard the system, the Burmester music server was brand new. The analog front end was the Graham Phantom with Benz LP-S mounted on the top of the line Avid table. The preamplifier/phono were also top of the line Burmester and the system was wired with top of the line Wireworld IC and speaker cables. (sorry I don't remember the models ).