Laying your records on a table on top of microfiber towels and scrubbing them before they go into the RCM? And people think I'm crazy because I clean each LP before I play it.
I think the enzyme cleaners are awesome. I have largely used the Walker 4 step process, but there is an even wider range with the AIVS and I think even MoFi may now offer one. I like the MoFi brushes (really pads) with grippy handles.
My VPI just died, so I'm pondering whether to go ultrasonic.
I really like DD Miracle (this stuff is supposed to be diluted with water) and AIVS #15. I don't find a big difference between them. As long as you do two water rinses to get all the soap solution off they will both get records in sufficiently good condition playing quietly.
AIVS's Jim Pendleton recommends leaving the AIVS solution on the vinyl for 4-6 minutes to bring up any crud in the grooves to the surface. In my experience his advice is spot on. If the solution starts to evaporate I apply more and gently agitate it again. Using that method with DD Miracle I find both work equally well. In the past I would vacuum off the DD Miracle as soon as it was applied. Since I was vacuuming the DD Miracle off immediately I was finding I was getting better results with AIVS. Both equalized when I left the DD Miracle on the vinyl for a similar amount of time, then vacuumed.
I use VinylZyme (recommended by Loricraft) for the grungy stuff, but rarely buy records that warrant it. I've had the same bottle for a long time.
My concern about using two cleaning systems (aside from labor) is that any residue left by the cleaning fluids could screw up the US machines- isn't that why some people were having 'foaming' problems with the Audio Desk?
Myles- you know biology- I would assume that the best vacuum type cleaner (string or wand, I don't care) will suck up the liquid, but on a molecular level, isn't there still going to be some residue (of the cleaning fluid) which remains?
I assume, perhaps incorrectly, that one of the reasons for multi-step fluid cleaning is to keep displacing the prior fluid until you are down to lab water, then 'finishing rinse' (at least with Walker, which I assume has some tiny amount of alcohol to enhance evaporation) so that you are left with as little fluid residue as possible.
Also, I think sometimes (and you have alluded to this in prior threads Myles), we are hearing the sonic signature of the fluids.
I'd go AVIS or MOFI RCF/enzyme. AVIS one step/#15 w/H2O rinse is quite good.
Myles, thank you for the advice. I ordered MOFI RCF/enzyme and more Record Time. Should have the package later in the week.
My concern about using two cleaning systems (aside from labor) is that any residue left by the cleaning fluids could screw up the US machines- isn't that why some people were having 'foaming' problems with the Audio Desk?
Myles- you know biology- I would assume that the best vacuum type cleaner (string or wand, I don't care) will suck up the liquid, but on a molecular level, isn't there still going to be some residue (of the cleaning fluid) which remains?
I assume, perhaps incorrectly, that one of the reasons for multi-step fluid cleaning is to keep displacing the prior fluid until you are down to lab water, then 'finishing rinse' (at least with Walker, which I assume has some tiny amount of alcohol to enhance evaporation) so that you are left with as little fluid residue as possible.
Also, I think sometimes (and you have alluded to this in prior threads Myles), we are hearing the sonic signature of the fluids.
Did you get the water rinse too?
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |