agree factors 'in addition to' realism are in play. but intentionally avoiding realism i have not seen.I think there are speaker manufacturers who target things other than realism.
agree factors 'in addition to' realism are in play. but intentionally avoiding realism i have not seen.I think there are speaker manufacturers who target things other than realism.
I believe your current speakers, which I think are fantastic, would be just as successful with MDF.
maybe HDF might be hard to differentiate from layers of Baltic Birch assuming the mass was similar. MDF less so. but it would come down to listening.I believe your current speakers, which I think are fantastic, would be just as successful with MDF.
with such a heavy 600+ pound cabinet maybe material is not so critical. mass and internal shape/acoustical coupling more important.I will have to leave this hard question to Mike ...
I’d love to know his opinion as your speakers were my favorite of the show that year.The designer of my speakers, who also uses Baltic Birch, will probably disagree on substitution with MDF. I can ask him.
No. But it’s sufficient and not resonating away like some people on this forum who have no experience with the Lansing speakers community make readers assumeBaltic birch is not an exotic material.
I’d love to know his opinion as your speakers were my favorite of the show that year.
I am surprised to see you say that. Of course everything is subject to diminishing returns including cabinets but they matter. A lot. You are not just trying to remove cabinet noise but lowering the noise floor allows you to hear the drivers leading and trailing edges which would otherwise be obscured. You will hear this as better resolution. This concept is fundamental to isolation, grounding, power strategies. Footers matter. Grounding matters. Power matters. You want to minimize all these factors but in the largest source of error (by far) the speakers you dont want to eliminate a major cause of it? Do this: go listen to a Rockport Atria 2 and then go listen to a lynx. The only difference is a 10vs 9 inch woofer and the cabinet. It’s not close! Yes it comes at quite a cost (more than double) and many with limited budgets would put the money elsewhere but this is “what’s BEST forum” and there is zero question which is better. There is not yet a “ silent” cabinet. I love my Orions but you can hear that the Lyras cabinet is quieter if you listen carefully. I wish what you said was true but I hear the differences everyday when I listen to speakers and I listen every day.“So we see today heroic, I mean, just unbelievable amounts of money spent on cabinets, the speaker cabinets. But once they’re silent, they’re silent. There’s no need to throw any more money at them.” he said.
“It isn’t going to make the speaker any better. It’s just going to make it more expensive. It might make it prettier, but it’s not going to make it perform better.” RV
Maybe he'll start a trend. As designers come closer to retirement they do a 'tell-all' interview in an e-zine. I suppose an earbud and headphone site felt comfortable with such an article from a major speaker manufacturer -- not likely to offend their other advertisers.
No, never heard them do well in blues and rock. They are dynamically quite flat.
(...) with such a heavy 600+ pound cabinet maybe material is not so critical. mass and internal shape/acoustical coupling more important.
Exotic Cabinet materials are a gimmick. Some of the worst speaker systems I’ve heard use the most exotic and expensive materials.
I just picked off the top of my head designers who could choose to make wood cabinets like almost everybody else, but who choose for their own reasons to make cabinets out of a material other than wood. In the middle of the night I forgot to include Val Cora, so I'm going to go back and add him to my original post.
I am surprised to see you say that.
this requires the giant assumption of what the goals are or should be. Assuming that everyone actually has a goal or that their goal is one you like is a huge leap of fate.
My problem with much of the Industry is what exactly are their goals? What is the target? How can High End Magazines have multiple reference systems from multiple reviewers and not defined goal other than vague words like Organic, Musical, Natural and realism and yet no one agrees what they mean.
Searching for mysteries without any clues....thanks Mr. Seger
The interesting question to me is this: many, many people over the decades think Magnepan loudspeakers with their wood frames sound good. How do we know a heroically heavy metal frame wouldn't alter the sound in a deleterious way? The wood frame affects the sound differently than a metal frame would affect the sound.
There's just no way to know which sound each one of us would prefer. Perhaps it is partly the wood frame itself which gives Magnepan its characteristically natural and slightly warm-balanced sound?
The wood frame, which is far less expensive than a metal frame, might very well be the frame material that sounds better on this particular loudspeaker.
perhaps , however much of what's out there sounds nothing the same or IMO even resembles the sound of realism. But alas this is the stickler..what is realism?
Is the goal live music? is the goal the mic feed? is the goal whatever I like, is the goal a rock show in a football stadium, is the goal a solo violin at Carnegie Hall? is the goal a night club? No one ever seems to ask these questions and so it's become "whatever" so if it is whatever then why should anyone care what's "organic, natural etc"
Are we satisfied with say Frozen Pizza? it is Pizza afterall. I'm sure the company was trying to make Pizza!
Words are words the issue is what they mean. I hear all these words thrown around like nothing . IMO they are generalizatione used to make people sound like they are experts.What would you suggest Elliot would be a less vague term to describe a potential goal?
yes Petter, and I have stated how I do what I do many times. BTW I have listened with almost all the vendors I do business with and discussed their gear before I write a check . I have made errors and have moved on. I make less and less however since I don't do the willy nilly stuff and collect brands like many places doI would ask you what kind of experience are you trying to deliver to your customer by choosing the brands you sell and then set up in their homes? Have you asked your manufacturers what their target is? As a dealer, where is your target?
Lyra is a dead speaker, compared to say Stenheim, another cone speaker, both heard with CHI am surprised to see you say that. Of course everything is subject to diminishing returns including cabinets but they matter. A lot. You are not just trying to remove cabinet noise but lowering the noise floor allows you to hear the drivers leading and trailing edges which would otherwise be obscured. You will hear this as better resolution. This concept is fundamental to isolation, grounding, power strategies. Footers matter. Grounding matters. Power matters. You want to minimize all these factors but in the largest source of error (by far) the speakers you dont want to eliminate a major cause of it? Do this: go listen to a Rockport Atria 2 and then go listen to a lynx. The only difference is a 10vs 9 inch woofer and the cabinet. It’s not close! Yes it comes at quite a cost (more than double) and many with limited budgets would put the money elsewhere but this is “what’s BEST forum” and there is zero question which is better. There is not yet a “ silent” cabinet. I love my Orions but you can hear that the Lyras cabinet is quieter if you listen carefully. I wish what you said was true but I hear the differences everyday when I listen to speakers and I listen every day.
| Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |