Okay? I was just attempting to understand why the different reported lengths of time before things settle in between the two applications I indicated...Now its crystal clear... 
Okay? I was just attempting to understand why the different reported lengths of time before things settle in between the two applications I indicated...Now its crystal clear...![]()
TBH EMILE I don't understand. My attempt at sarcasm failed. I see the linear line. And if I understand, it represents improvement happens in the first 50% of the timeline and smaller improvements happen on the timeline until it is done. But it doesn't show where it ends.Okay? I was just attempting to understand why the different reported lengths of time before things settle in between the two applications I indicated...Now its crystal clear...![]()
TBH EMILE I don't understand. My attempt at sarcasm failed. I see the linear line. And if I understand, it represents improvement happens in the first 50% of the timeline and smaller improvements happen on the timeline until it is done. But it doesn't show where it ends.
This is NOT a big deal to me (just curious) just attempting to understand why 360 NATIVE XDMI seems to settle in quicker. Its really a MUTE point, whatever amount of time it takes, so be it, its not significant....Again I was just curious...
Thank You, this makes sense to me...I don’t think the H360 modules settles faster. Most likely people just stop noticing/caring aka are just enjoying the music. Additionally H360 users tend to roll tubes and are therefore more accustomed to listening through burn-in effects.
I'm trying to research silicon/nano chemical changes in circuits and how this process effects the short and long term process of run in..Can anyone explain why the curve is not really monotonic (as shown)? Why does performance ever take a step back, then improve further?
Is it one thing getting changing for the better and then taking a step back, then improving again?
Or is it multiple things settling in at different rates and along the way to their final settling points, the ying-yang ratio may go from good to bad until all components settling where the ying-yang is optimum?
Happy Friday @Taiko Audio @Christiaan Punter
Would you kindly update the delivery progress?
And My number is 91.1. According to your Jan update, there should be 60+ chassis received from the anodizers. Hopefully mine will be in that batch and get delivered soon.
Thanks for your update.
Capacitors usually have the biggest impact on break-in. The best ones require 400-600 hrs. to properly form, then sometimes months to fully stabilize. The break-in roller coaster is the cumulative effect of multiple elements going through their individual growing pains. It's not a linear function. Can be signal caps, PS caps, shunt caps - ALL CAPSI'm trying to research silicon/nano chemical changes in circuits and how this process effects the short and long term process of run in..
Hard to nail down this info.. looking for multiple papers.. not just one.
Bingo! ThanksThe break-in roller coaster is the cumulative effect of multiple elements going through their individual growing pains. It's not a linear function.
What are the stupid footers misplaced under the Olympus???
Clearly Taiko says no misplaced footers under the Olympus, just in-place of the stock footers.
That’s a very good and fair question. The photo was taken at the end of the day when the room was somewhat dialed in (there was no point in playing with footers before that). Just before leaving, I wanted to experiment with isolation between the Olympus and the glass.What are the stupid footers misplaced under the Olympus???
Clearly Taiko says no misplaced footers under the Olympus, just in-place of the stock footers.
@Kingsrule as always has a way with words
Thanks for the explanation Vassil, you had many of us wondering "what the Hell is that" At first I thought it was an optical illusion...That’s a very good and fair question. The photo was taken at the end of the day when the room was somewhat dialed in (there was no point in playing with footers before that). Just before leaving, I wanted to experiment with isolation between the Olympus and the glass.
I found these Hifistay footers, but we only had three of them. I placed them just to see if they would make a difference, and the improvement was massive - even in a show environment. The importer of these products mentioned that he had more footers, which I’ll be getting in the morning. My plan is to install four today, preferably four under the I/O, and possibly something on the network stack at the bottom. Glass shelves are really bad!
Placing footers anywhere other than under the original Taiko footers is risky, as these chassis are very heavy. I was, of course, careful about where I placed that one footer and ensured it wouldn’t cause any damage, even though it was only temporary. Ideally, footers shouldn’t be positioned like that on the Olympus, but in this case, it’s actually okay. What’s more critical is to avoid doing this under the I/O when the I/O and the Olympus are stacked together.
| Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |