I read the review. Obviously positive. Didn't satisfy me personally as I don't feel I know anything more about the sonic differences between the 1 and 10 series. This review is more about how the new versions make the reviewer feel and the musicality that comes through rather than specific audible differences that can be described using typical audiophile terminology.
I'm not trying to discourage anyone from reading it, nor am I complaining, just sharing my personal thoughts on it.
I read the review. Obviously positive. Didn't satisfy me personally as I don't feel I know anything more about the sonic differences between the 1 and 10 series. This review is more about how the new versions make the reviewer feel and the musicality that comes through rather than specific audible differences that can be described using typical audiophile terminology.
I'm not trying to discourage anyone from reading it, nor am I complaining, just sharing my personal thoughts on it.
I'm not sure what you mean as IMO he describes very well the differences he is hearing.
and I quote" But despite that, the performance of the single M10 still trumps the pair of M1.1s, delivering greater separation and dimensionality, timbral and textural definition, fluid rhythmic expression and more positive dynamics, all set against a ghostly quiet, jet black background."
There of course is a lot more in the review and for those interested I certainly suggest you check it out and if interested of course listen to the new gear. I am going to get the preamp and amp later this year I just can't buy all I want at the same time LOL
You might well think we’re getting pretty good at this hi-fi thing. After all, we’ve been at it a while and, reading the press, you could easily conclude