BMW i9

[ack]

Approved for 2016 production

http://www.carswatcher.com/Article/4017/rumored-bmw-i9-more-futuristic-than-the-i8

 

[slowGEEZR]

No bumpers?

 

[ack]

Right, 'cause it would look butt ugly

 

[JackD201]

Available in countries without speed bumps

 

[treitz3]

This car may be in the "supercar class" but it gets my vote as one of the top five ugliest cars ever made. Fans of this car and fans of BMW, please forgive me for such a statement. Let's just say that it isn't eye candy for me. At all.

Tom

 

[FrantzM]

This car may be in the "supercar class" but it gets my vote as one of the top five ugliest cars ever made. Fans of this car and fans of BMW, please forgive me for such a statement. Let's just say that it isn't eye candy for me. At all.

Tom

I am with you


This is indeed a butt-ugly car

 

[andromedaaudio]

No i like it , but indeed like jack said , speed bumps oughs , but maybe it has some lift possibility built in
The nose and butt could be better however , but this in production mm ??

 

[JackD201]

I don't see it as anything more than a concept car. The tires are a giveaway.

 

[audioarcher]

Should be no problem to cool the front brakes with that design. The bottom front skirt looks flimsy. Don't see how it would last long. Definitely not road worthy yet.

 

[rockitman]

I don't see it as anything more than a concept car. The tires are a giveaway.

Ed Zacchary...the production model will look quite different.

 

[Peter Breuninger]

This car may be in the "supercar class" but it gets my vote as one of the top five ugliest cars ever made. Fans of this car and fans of BMW, please forgive me for such a statement. Let's just say that it isn't eye candy for me. At all.

Tom

Tom,

I have to agree with you. This is terrible, ImHO