Most SS need not apply...Is it a fair criticism? For which models and brands?
And if so, is it the speaker design or the amps interacting with the speaker? Or something else?
I hear "aggressiveness" (or coloration or edginess or shoutiness or honk) in SOME horn loudspeakers.
A horn that cannot portray depth when it is on the recording is creating some kind of distortion that is preventing the proper development of space perception.I think we need the OP to better define "aggressiveness". I was thinking he was talking about the more dynamic and forward sound of horns in general, or colorations that accentuate that particular trait. In which case all horns would exhibit this to some degree because of efficiency and polar pattern, but that's a good thing... so I was thinking part of the issue is a positive trait, but other parts could be seen as a negative.
No Problem with that here....
View attachment 71409
Hi Bill, you got a sharp eye I must say!
After many many years of developing normal dynamic loudspeakers, ESL (10 years) Horns were my ultimate goal, driven by 2 300B SET (all done via intensive listening, measuring...and thinking ;-) ). The main horn started as a 1-way (Lowther) with a simpel shelving filter to flatten the mids. The horn size had to be limited to a 40Hz design (and not stretching to 20Hz as I aimed for years before). After having the optimum and listening a long period, the curiosity hit me. If the main horn sounded that good and low on distortion...what would it do for the mids. I always enjoyed the low distortion of my ESL's so for me that was the way forward, simplicity, low moving mass, phase etc. Having said that, bougth some cheap but good second hand mid-horn (Fostex), installed, filter...and there was no way back. AMAZING! But work to do. What would be the best possible horn-mid (for me that is)-> ended up with a TD2001 driver (could have been larger than 1" but, I wanted to have the low mass...and Be diafragm). The last bit was the search for a tweeter (if any), so had the T900A fostex, JBL (slot-type) and it just added the "ambience" on top of the TD2001. BUT, thinking back to the low mass ESL foils......Ribbon is comparable without the struggle of keeping the ESL foil coating in top-condition. So I looked for the best and also for the best designer/knowledge...ended up with RAAL (lazy Ribbon). A good tweeter is not even "noticed". The RAAL is mounted on an adjustable slide for phase alignment wrt the TD2001. Unfortunately there was no (WAF) option to also phase align the low with Mid/Hi.
For the filtering there is a lot of going back and forth with measurements and listening to a lot of different music and keeping things simple. Theory vs reality. In the mean-time I could not reduce the mid-cone of the lowther without higher order filtering and the Fostex208 had a better response curve (no mid-cone) with comparable T&S parameters. The TD2001 started with a 3rd order high-pass and a second order low-pass, first of all to avoid overload in the lower F. Cross-over from low-mid: approx 800-900Hz. Mid-Hi: 8-10kHz. Low, low-pass second order.
AB switching with filter components was an eye-opener, blind tested with several people. Difference between capacitor types or inductors air-wire vs ribbon foil in wax etc.
Measurements ok, sound good...but was it the best?
Striving to "as simple as possible", looked for options to strip down the filtering and there are some tricks that are not easily to explain in text here that are not realy standard in normal designs. One of the things that made a big difference is to see if the TD2001 could pass at 600-700Hz with a lower order filter and looking at the specs it is possible IF the max power curve is not exceeded...so I did and it worked out great. The low is single order filtered now and so is the tweeter.
All units are aligned to the listening position with a laser by the way.
Now, how perfect was this. Not there yet. Some recordings sound too much in the mids (and partly this might relate to the actual topic) Measurements looked good...flatlining here at the listening position but this was not the correct approach. A flat line measured in an sound-proofed chamber is a good start but when putting that speaker in the living room there will be reflections that will "help" mids/highs. With this help on an already flat curve...well...it might be too much. Measurements in room, aim for 6-8dB drop-off from low to high frequencies. Modified a bit on adjusting mid/high selector switch and now I must say it's great!
What's next? Who knows, but I usually find another step ;-)
Feel free to ask any questions and I 'll be glad to answer them.
Yes, that’s right Bill. Stavros also time aligns the drivers and the backloaded horn is good to 30hz.Thanks Arno. It is a very clever and well thought out solution I must say. Are you time aligning the back loaded horn with the mid and RAAL at all? If not I wondered how that was working out. Aries Cerat is similar solution from what I see in this respect - back loaded Fostex + mid + tweeter. I even think the Aries uses a ribbon in the tweeter horn.
Did you build the back loaded horn itself? Is there plans for this or did you design it?
Best wishes and very pleased you posted here and shared your system.
Yes, that’s right Bill. Stavros also time aligns the drivers and the backloaded horn is good to 30hz.
Hi Bill, there is no time-alignment between mid/low, but then again this part is not the most critical since the edge of an impulse is vastly made by the mid/highs. The BLH is home-made and it started with reading a lot of books, first calculations and aiming for the best size vs lowF trade-off....and Tractrix is a good choice. After that I used AJHorn software (bought, cheap but effective), played around a bit and in the end printed the 3.5m straight horn profile. Measured the ceiling height and figured out how the long horn should be cut and bended to fit in. Glued that design on card-board and cut the parts out. Glue and stuff to shape the mini proto (10cm high) to get the feel on how to build it in real size and how wood had to be processed etc. After that.....do it ;-) Test in, measure and since it was correlating to what I wanted....start to finish...2 wooden Ikea salad bowls for the housing etc etcThanks Arno. It is a very clever and well thought out solution I must say. Are you time aligning the back loaded horn with the mid and RAAL at all? If not I wondered how that was working out. Aries Cerat is similar solution from what I see in this respect - back loaded Fostex + mid + tweeter. I even think the Aries uses a ribbon in the tweeter horn.
Did you build the back loaded horn itself? Is there plans for this or did you design it?
Best wishes and very pleased you posted here and shared your system.
Honestly...not sure how it is done...Thanks Brad. How does Stavros time align the back loaded horn, which must be 3+ metres long?
Thanks Arno. It is a very clever and well thought out solution I must say. Are you time aligning the back loaded horn with the mid and RAAL at all? If not I wondered how that was working out. Aries Cerat is similar solution from what I see in this respect - back loaded Fostex + mid + tweeter. I even think the Aries uses a ribbon in the tweeter horn.
Did you build the back loaded horn itself? Is there plans for this or did you design it?
Best wishes and very pleased you posted here and shared your system.
Indeed, the 2001 is a good high F performer and the trick is that even though it sounds really good with only high pass 2001 filtering to blend in the actual tweeter and filter back the highest part of the 2001 since after all the higher the F the lower the moving mass has to be and here the very light Be diafragm can't win from the ribbon foil.Yes Stavros uses a ribbon tweeter. Steve in UK uses the RAAL ribbon tweeter on a vitavox S2
Arno, the question I have is that 2001 is often used as a tweeter itself, and has great high end extension over 20k. I have heard it in a two way. What do you get or lose, if you keep it only to the 2001 vs adding a ribbon on top?
Basically a good start is to get transducers lined up as good as possible but the actual finetuning needs to be done since also the exact acoustic center might be different and the filters can introduce additional shifts. What I do for the last step is to run clio pocket in a cycled measurement while observing the impulse response adjusting the tweeter position wrt mid-horn.Honestly...not sure how it is done...
Basically a good start is to get transducers lined up as good as possible but the actual finetuning needs to be done since also the exact acoustic center might be different and the filters can introduce additional shifts. What I do for the last step is to run clio pocket in a cycled measurement while observing the impulse response adjusting the tweeter position wrt mid-horn.
By the way the low speaker impuls-bump is also visible during that but I can't move this.
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |