I have the DSW2 equaliser. But love EmmLabs so I’m keen to hear your shoot out evaluation
bizarrely. I pair my equaliser with the entry left DS -audio cart coz it just WORKS!
DS Audio Grand Master + EMM Labs DS-EQ1
- Thread starter Ron Resnick
- Start date
bizarrely. I pair my equaliser with the entry left DS -audio cart coz it just WORKS!
My Grand Master has been retipped. After 5 weeks, it has returned, the dealer said the usual time for retipping is 8 weeks. He has been pushing all along to make sure it is back before Christmas.
I am very grateful for him not only for the “speedy” repair but he also lent me a Master 1 cartridge to use in the mean time. The difference between Grand Master and Master 1 using Grand Master equalizer is immediately apparent. Grand Master is much better, not to say Master 1 is no good but it is no comparsion to Grand Master resolution, dynamics and sound stage.
I am very grateful for him not only for the “speedy” repair but he also lent me a Master 1 cartridge to use in the mean time. The difference between Grand Master and Master 1 using Grand Master equalizer is immediately apparent. Grand Master is much better, not to say Master 1 is no good but it is no comparsion to Grand Master resolution, dynamics and sound stage.
Demo done
My THOUGHTS (my room, my ears, etc)
Main albums slowed down/repeated for particular instruments and vocals (plenty others were used)
Jethro Tull •Aqualung•
Dean Martin •Dreaming with Dean•
Steely Dan •Aja•
Emmlabs preferred
*********
Emmlabs
Incredible detail, smooth, natural, wide and deep soundstage.
Prefer withOUT the "high pass filter" setting activated on the Emmlabs
**********
DS Audio DS Master1
Setting 1
Significantly too much bass, which either clouds the midrange or the midrange also is constrained. Might be good with bookshelf, planar etc speakers. Overwhelming for my speakers, in my room.
Setting 2
Competitive. Good sound, actually very good sound, but slightly less detailed and less smooth decay by comparison to the Emmlabs. Less natural acoustic guitar and vocals. But Setting 2 could be used to sell this product.
Setting 3
Too rolled off highs. Not bad though. Instantly less clear than setting 2 from top to bottom.
Who would prefer the DS equalizer? Well, first and foremost, all of my findings are specific to my room, my system, and my ears. Nothing more.
IMHO many people could like - really like - Setting 2 on the DS equalizer, particularly those who might value warmth over detail, and maybe the DS would mate very well to particular systems. Of course, everyone should hear BOTH in his/her own system and then decide which sounds the best.
Please FEEL FREE to come to Columbus, Ohio and listen for yourself. I’ll have both for a while. You're welcome any time!
I’m buying the Emmlabs.
My THOUGHTS (my room, my ears, etc)
Main albums slowed down/repeated for particular instruments and vocals (plenty others were used)
Jethro Tull •Aqualung•
Dean Martin •Dreaming with Dean•
Steely Dan •Aja•
Emmlabs preferred
*********
Emmlabs
Incredible detail, smooth, natural, wide and deep soundstage.
Prefer withOUT the "high pass filter" setting activated on the Emmlabs
**********
DS Audio DS Master1
Setting 1
Significantly too much bass, which either clouds the midrange or the midrange also is constrained. Might be good with bookshelf, planar etc speakers. Overwhelming for my speakers, in my room.
Setting 2
Competitive. Good sound, actually very good sound, but slightly less detailed and less smooth decay by comparison to the Emmlabs. Less natural acoustic guitar and vocals. But Setting 2 could be used to sell this product.
Setting 3
Too rolled off highs. Not bad though. Instantly less clear than setting 2 from top to bottom.
Who would prefer the DS equalizer? Well, first and foremost, all of my findings are specific to my room, my system, and my ears. Nothing more.
IMHO many people could like - really like - Setting 2 on the DS equalizer, particularly those who might value warmth over detail, and maybe the DS would mate very well to particular systems. Of course, everyone should hear BOTH in his/her own system and then decide which sounds the best.
Please FEEL FREE to come to Columbus, Ohio and listen for yourself. I’ll have both for a while. You're welcome any time!
I’m buying the Emmlabs.
Have you tried to swap your hand on the DS Audio DS Master 1 equalizer? When I touch or swap my Grand Master equalizer, there is "pop" sound coming from the speakers. I wonder if it is the same with Master 1. It seems to do with static electricity.
GDS
Interested to hear your thoughts. I would concur with you 100%. I only heard the DS equalizer in a friends system compared to the EMMlabs but I much preferred the Emm but the bass was 'bigger' with the DS.
Just found this thread and I have a bit of experience with these DS cartridges and thought I would share my impressions.
I have two friends that have/had the DS cartridges (with DS decoders...not EMM labs). One friend still has it and the other went back to more traditional setups.
The first friend, who went back to traditional setups, had the 2nd to the top of the line from DS. At first he was enthralled by the resolution and powerful direct sound. However, over time he lost interest in listening to analog and was finding the sound too analytical and not musical enough. Now he is back to a traditional MC with tube phonostage. Having heard the before and after, I can whole heartedly state that there is subjectively as much resolution but the whole thing hangs together in a more holistic fashion and gives music now...not forensic dissection.
The second friend, who tends to prefer a more analytical sound, is still smitten with his DS implementation, he has the 2nd level of cartridge/decoder. Prior to this he had Lyra Skala with Allnic phonostage, which to my ears was preferable, if slightly less resolving. My friend does like tubes but more on the resolving end of the tube scale and not the warm end (he has Nagra VPA monos, Nagra tube pre). Personally, I think that setup would be better with the previous lyra/Allnic combo but he really likes microscopic detail and the powerful foundation the DS provides...the other combo was more "delicate" sounding.
Long story short, I heard the same characteristics in both systems; Highly resolving, almost forensic and clearly cut from the more analytical side of the cloth. Powerful driving sound that could be rather relentless in some systems. Maybe this is more accurate but it also perhaps serves to show more clearly the limitations of the medium of LP.
I have two friends that have/had the DS cartridges (with DS decoders...not EMM labs). One friend still has it and the other went back to more traditional setups.
The first friend, who went back to traditional setups, had the 2nd to the top of the line from DS. At first he was enthralled by the resolution and powerful direct sound. However, over time he lost interest in listening to analog and was finding the sound too analytical and not musical enough. Now he is back to a traditional MC with tube phonostage. Having heard the before and after, I can whole heartedly state that there is subjectively as much resolution but the whole thing hangs together in a more holistic fashion and gives music now...not forensic dissection.
The second friend, who tends to prefer a more analytical sound, is still smitten with his DS implementation, he has the 2nd level of cartridge/decoder. Prior to this he had Lyra Skala with Allnic phonostage, which to my ears was preferable, if slightly less resolving. My friend does like tubes but more on the resolving end of the tube scale and not the warm end (he has Nagra VPA monos, Nagra tube pre). Personally, I think that setup would be better with the previous lyra/Allnic combo but he really likes microscopic detail and the powerful foundation the DS provides...the other combo was more "delicate" sounding.
Long story short, I heard the same characteristics in both systems; Highly resolving, almost forensic and clearly cut from the more analytical side of the cloth. Powerful driving sound that could be rather relentless in some systems. Maybe this is more accurate but it also perhaps serves to show more clearly the limitations of the medium of LP.
Are you describing the latest versions? This was a general complaint of the earlier generation DS models.
The latest versions are said to address this somewhat. I've only heard the DS03 of the later models, to these ears it delivered a more natural, believable acoustic than a Luxman DX10 sacd player in the same system. That despite a modest TT/arm setup.
Suggested to me that the reports about the later generation DS are well founded and the brand is well worth investigating.
I’m not hearing what you are describing in my room (“analytical” or "forensic dissection") though I understand some people live on different edges of these ideas. One person’s “natural and detailed” is another person’s “dry and analytical.”
Maybe encourage them to home-demo the Emm Labs equalizer? Feel free to PM me if you need a connection to do that. I’m at the stage I want to hear things in my own system to make a decision.
Last edited:
The Meitner family reference system
EMM Labs PRE preamplifier, DS-EQ1 Optical Equalizer, DS Audio Master1 Optical Cartridge & Technics direct drive turntable
EMM Labs PRE preamplifier, DS-EQ1 Optical Equalizer, DS Audio Master1 Optical Cartridge & Technics direct drive turntable
Last edited:
DDK posted in a different thread about, I think, the DS Audio optical cartridge: "There's only one design really and what I heard was sonically natural and impressive but not more than any other high quality cartridge to justify the limitation of the phono box, that's why I don't own one."
David, is this correct? Did you audition a DS Audio optical cartridge and find it to be "sonically natural and impressive"?
David, is this correct? Did you audition a DS Audio optical cartridge and find it to be "sonically natural and impressive"?
I tend to agree with DDK. Grand Master sounds more natural and tape like than other cartridges that I have.
Etsuro Gold is my favorite MC cartridge, it is more lively and more vivid than Grand Master but it cannot beat GM completely. MC cartridge sounds better in upper midrange to treble while optical cartridge is good in midrange and bass.
There is no one size fit all in vinyl. If you have the extra space and an extra arm, one arm for MC and one arm for optical would give you the best of both worlds.
I haven’t yet heard the Grand Master version of the DS system.
The other versions were not natural sounding at all - far from it. They sounded very much more akin to a digital presentation in terms of quality of tonal rendition / authenticity. There was however a very low noise floor and for some reason the timing sounded very good.
Curious to hear if these things are resolved with the Grand Master iteration though.
Personally not keen on being tied into one platform (cart and “phono”) as it is very restrictive as your system grows.
The other versions were not natural sounding at all - far from it. They sounded very much more akin to a digital presentation in terms of quality of tonal rendition / authenticity. There was however a very low noise floor and for some reason the timing sounded very good.
Curious to hear if these things are resolved with the Grand Master iteration though.
Personally not keen on being tied into one platform (cart and “phono”) as it is very restrictive as your system grows.
I have tried DS Audio Master 1 and Grand Master with Grand Master equalizer. Grand Master is much better.
By natural, it means more real, more smooth. Listening to vocal, you feel more realistic, just like the singer in singing in front of you. I don't have much experience with reel to reel tape, but I limited listening to tape gave me similar impression.
MC cartridge somehow has enhanced sound. It still sounds good but doesn't have the same natural characteristic of Grand Master.
Yes in a friend’s system and his AS2000. Sonically there’s not much to fault but I don’t like the idea of a closed system, if the box goes down you can’t substitute another phono. Unknown if a future model will be compatible with the current box which costs as much as a high end phono that can last a very long time and won’t limit you to one cartridge. Rack space and location is another consideration if one has other cartridges and phono preamps. With cartridges one has to seriously consider the after sales service this is an unknown with DS Audio, at least for me.
david
Similar threads
 | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator |  | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator |  | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |