My guess is that it has something to do with both nature (genetics) and nurture (behavior). It is a fairly small, educated and very homogenous population with a similar set of values. I am not surprised by those statistics.
Or, like Steve is doing, trying to get to zero cost driving using his solar panels to feed his car. I don’t have the option—unless I cut down the CO2 gobbling trees on my property.
My big question is simple... do we have any REAL evidence reducing carbon dioxide emissions will actually have any impact whatsoever on global temperatures? Its all a hypothosis no matter how many well intentioned people believe it (assuming folks are indeed well intentioned.)
It has nothing to do with either. It's all about the government providing a safety net for the people, so they are not stressed or concerned about employment, survival or illness.
This is exactly what we need in this country.
Didn't you mention a few posts back "its not about politics?"
I could just as easily post a lot of graphs and research that contradicts your arguments. But this isn't a climate forum. I believe the original post had to do with taxes since EV's don't pay fuel taxes which contribute to road building/maintenance. (A sketchy enough topic for this forum from the outset I'd say.)
On the other hand, Norway gets really cold. . . .
Global Warming is not natural or political.
Best places to live on the planet have everything to do with politics and government.
Lets see them. I want to know the sources Every single one will be sourced from the big oil companies. They are putting billions into defending their pollution.
I've only shown you the easy to access graphs. There are hundreds more from many reputable agencies, governmental, private and academic.
The worldwide overwhelming consensus is that humans are warming the planet. You still believe the earth is flat too? The moon mission in 1969 was a farce?
Lets see them. I want to know the sources Every single one will be sourced from the big oil companies. They are putting billions into defending their pollution.
I've only shown you the easy to access graphs. There are hundreds more from many reputable agencies, governmental, private and academic.
The worldwide overwhelming consensus is that humans are warming the planet. You still believe the earth is flat too? The moon mission in 1969 was a farce?
This is a good point. I am typically skeptical of quality of life country rankings which show the Scandinavian countries ranking very high. Often if I look at the underlying determinants of the aggregate score I see things that don’t make a lot of sense and which, to me, invalidate the results.
Weather is rarely one of the factors in these rankings.
Global Warming is not natural or political.
Best places to live on the planet have everything to do with politics and government.
It has nothing to do with either. It's all about the government providing a safety net for the people, so they are not stressed or concerned about employment, survival or illness.
This is exactly what we need in this country.
Which cities in the world are the cleanest in the year 2019?
Our largest state provides a safety net for its people, perhaps bigger than other states, and yet they seem stressed and concerned about employment, survival, and illness, especially in the population centers.
We should celebrate our diversity and the incredible sense of opportunity that exists here as in few places on the planet, made possible by our form of government and our adhesion to the Constitution. Rather than wallowing in doom and gloom, we should come together and seize the opportunity that is before us. I see reason to be optimistic.
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |