A conversation with mep, about an old Wallflowers album, got me to thinking about this. I make "Learning Lists" all the time, of songs I'm working on with the band, or solo, or simply listening to in search of possible arrangements for either of those performance situations. I play along with them at home, listen to them on my iPhone at work, and burn CDs to listen to them in the car, so I can get the structure, lyrics, harmonies, etc, into my old head.
These play lists are often a mix of older recordings and newer, and/or remastered recordings. As one would expect, some of the newer recordings are much louder than the older ones (though it's not as common and severe as one would think), and will send me scrambling for the volume knob when they come on. But here's the intersting part; many of them, while loud, still sound good. Is there a lot of dynamics? No, but there isn't a lot of dynamics in a lot of popular studio recordings, and many of these loud modern recordings - actually the overwhelming majority of them in the genres I listen to -- are clean and quiet and as just plain good-sounding as the older recordings in every other way.
A good example, if any of you have it to listen to, is "Sea of Heartbreak," from Rosanne Cash's album "The List." I have to turn it down when it comes on in my learning list and/or turn the next song up when it's over. Its LOUDNESS is obvious. But other than the fact that the dominant instruments and voices are at pretty much the same level, it sounds good. As good as most studio recordings, better than many.
I'm not trying to say I don't want my dynamic range back, but I'm not sure that's really the main problem with contemporary masters and remasters, unless loudness is pushed into distortion. Bad EQ? Something else?
Tim
These play lists are often a mix of older recordings and newer, and/or remastered recordings. As one would expect, some of the newer recordings are much louder than the older ones (though it's not as common and severe as one would think), and will send me scrambling for the volume knob when they come on. But here's the intersting part; many of them, while loud, still sound good. Is there a lot of dynamics? No, but there isn't a lot of dynamics in a lot of popular studio recordings, and many of these loud modern recordings - actually the overwhelming majority of them in the genres I listen to -- are clean and quiet and as just plain good-sounding as the older recordings in every other way.
A good example, if any of you have it to listen to, is "Sea of Heartbreak," from Rosanne Cash's album "The List." I have to turn it down when it comes on in my learning list and/or turn the next song up when it's over. Its LOUDNESS is obvious. But other than the fact that the dominant instruments and voices are at pretty much the same level, it sounds good. As good as most studio recordings, better than many.
I'm not trying to say I don't want my dynamic range back, but I'm not sure that's really the main problem with contemporary masters and remasters, unless loudness is pushed into distortion. Bad EQ? Something else?
Tim