Any reviews that compare them to existing vinyl recordings will be audiophile reviews, and I will distrust them, and their pre-determined prejudice against all things digital, as much as you will distrust everything that doesn't fit your view. We would dance this old dance and end up where we started. Suffice it to say that I hear things in these masters that I have not heard in The Beatles recordings before, on any medium, and I trust my ears. If that's not good enough for you, you might just consider that they are re-
MASTERS, not re-CDs or re-vinyls. They went back to the masters, the things from which the vinyl was created, and the endeavored to improve upon them. Many thought they did, including, evidently, the surviving Beatles.
Here's the Google search:
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=The+Beatles+re-masters+reviews&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8. I'm sure you'll have no trouble finding something that will reinforce your existing beliefs.
Perhaps even better, here's a search on Steve Hoffman's Music Forum, the net's epicenter of masters, pressings and all other media OCD activity. I'm sure you can, and will, find whichever POV you prefer there, as well:
http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/search.php?searchid=14041137.
Enjoy.
Tim