Been reading again the review. Going back to PC, I read sentences like,
...The Ruby Double Crown has a rather dark color, with a sort of "center" between midrange and bass. This gives the sound certain power and weight as well as calm.
...The Acrolink sounds faster by contrast, showing things with more dynamics, without restraint. It lacks somewhat the incredible smoothness and perfect treble color of the Siltech
...I missed some breath and directness, offered in turn by the Acrolink. Hence, on my system the conclusion was: no, not really. Elsewhere, however, it may prove to be the most valuable cable of all the three!
Ozy, or anyone with experience with these, do you recognize what he is saying? Seems he is describing as a warm, weightfull presentation but not the most dynamic one. Seems strange. The Sc are very fast in their presentation in my experience and very extended in the highs.