What are some opinions among members of this forum concerning Diana Krall's work? Is she a credible jazz musician who knows her chops, or is she just fluff, a piece of ear-candy (or on the cover of her latest CD, eye-candy)?
Her recent CDs seem to have de-emphasized her piano playing in favor of presenting her as a singer. I agree that her best is the Live in Paris concert, especially the boozy and heart-breaking Joni Mitchell song, 'A Case of You'. Her band really swings and the backup orchestra doesn't detract from the fact that this is a jazz concert. Her next two efforts veer into ear candy territory, but they are beautifully recorded presentations of American standards. Nothing wrong with ear candy: I play them a lot. Must listen to her latest before condemning it as gross commercialism. That cover reminds me of Madonna.I've had the opportunity to see her live twice. My impression is that she's a better pianist than she is a singer although it's the latter she is famous for.
As is usually the case, there's something about energy from an audience that makes playing so much more vibrant compared to studio work. This is why Live in Paris is my favorite out of all her albums.
This may be a stretch, but Diana Krall reminds me a bit of Cecilia Bartoli in that she goes into more obscure material that others ignore, and this may be true with the Glad Rag Doll CD. I read that these songs were played by her father on the record player when she was a child, and that she is reviving them in a nostalgic way. No Ray Brown, Ray Brown, though. To me, she is most attractive as a jazz singer-pianist.-- A true artist, musician, is an explorer into new frontiers.
And Diana is exactly that; her last CD is a new exploration (Neil Young, Bob Dylan, Elvis Costello, ...; they all fit that category).
How boring it is from some musicians to always play the same kind of stuff (tempo).
______________________
And I certainly don't like everything from Neil Young (in particular some with his Crazy Horse band), but love most of the rest (90%+).
With Diana Krall; 93.333% :b
I've had the opportunity to see her live twice. My impression is that she's a better pianist than she is a singer although it's the latter she is famous for.
As is usually the case, there's something about energy from an audience that makes playing so much more vibrant compared to studio work. This is why Live in Paris is my favorite out of all her albums.
What are some opinions among members of this forum concerning Diana Krall's work? Is she a credible jazz musician who knows her chops, or is she just fluff, a piece of ear-candy (or on the cover of her latest CD, eye-candy)?
This may be a stretch, but Diana Krall reminds me a bit of Cecilia Bartoli in that she goes into more obscure material that others ignore, and this may be true with the Glad Rag Doll CD. I read that these songs were played by her father on the record player when she was a child, and that she is reviving them in a nostalgic way. No Ray Brown, Ray Brown, though. To me, she is most attractive as a jazz singer-pianist.
Hello, Cascais. My impressions aren't what many folks consider to be the norm. I know many a person that swears by her and her voice but for some reason I just can't get into her that much. I have the LIP album and while the music is great and she did impress me more than in any other album I have heard her in? Personally, I have to consider her fluff. Now, this is just my opinion. YMMV, as many folks who absolutely love her work can attest to.
I will tell you this. She can sing a whole lot better than me.
BTW, the link is finally dead Bob. Unless I missed it, the album is no longer available for download.
Tom
I hope so. She is charming and very modest. Saw her play in Oeiras, Portugal in a beautiful palace garden in front of 10,000 people.-- Hey, I know exactly how you feel. ...The best is yet to come. :b
I agree about recording quality on some Krall CDs. One of my standard "test" CDs is When I Look in Your Eyes. It has a great variety of sounds, from piano trio to full orchestra, with lots of detail and subtlety.I also agree on the fact that she "democratized" (no political affiliation uncovered) Jazz to a broader audience (among some other obvious artist like Jimmy Collum, Michael Buble or Norah Jones) -I like her tunes and recording quality /some albums are better than others in this regard) and always a benchmark. Saying that, any of her work is in my dessert island CD selection.
I've had the opportunity to see her live twice. My impression is that she's a better pianist than she is a singer although it's the latter she is famous for.
As is usually the case, there's something about energy from an audience that makes playing so much more vibrant compared to studio work. This is why Live in Paris is my favorite out of all her albums.
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |