As far as I remember Channel Classics were known mainly because of their SACDs and DSD files. Should we assume that the 192/24 files are of higher quality than the DSD ones?
No, I do not want to imply that the 24/192 files of Channel Classics sound better than the dsd files. According to Jared, the ceo/recording engineer of Channel classics, the latter sound better than the former (they are also more expensive than the other files). This makes sense of course because the Channel Classic master tapes are in dsd. However, I cannot play the dsd files in 'dsd mode' on my Trinity combo. Therefore I only listen to and can only judge the Channel Classics files that are not dsd. Therefore I mention in this thread the Channel Classics 24/192 files.