Stellavox IDEM Amplifier: Initial Review and Listening Impressions

Having lived with various Soulution components for over a year - including the 511 stereo amplifier and the flagship 727 and 757 preamplifiers, I have a solid grasp of the Soulution house sound. I agree with the consensus of reviews: Soulution delivers lifelike detail, exceptional speed, and transparency with a musical realism.

The new Soulution 717 stereo amplifier not only maintains this signature but also dramatically elevates the performance in one crucial area, addressing the only minor criticism one could level at the older designs. The sole reservation one might have about previous Soulution amplifiers was a feeling of being ever so slightly 'lite' in the lower registers. The 717 has unequivocally changed this perception.

Immediately, there is undeniable sense of new weight, body, substance, and power at the low-end. This new foundation complements the amplifier’s existing speed and resolution. The resulting sonic character is distinct: the 717 presents a "bottom-up" sound. This is not a criticism, but a description of its enhanced authority. The bass and mid-bass are now richly textured and substantial, providing a deep, organic anchor that supports the upper registers.

The comparison of the 717 to the IDEM is interesting

  • The 717s deliver a highly detailed, controlled, and authoritative sound. It is unequivocally solid-state in its ability to grip the speakers and reveal micro-dynamics with speed yet is one of the most musically compelling solid-state amplifiers. Is character is clearly “Bottom up”
  • IDEM: Provides a more natural, relaxed, and organic listening experience, embodying an extreme neutrality with a transparency often likened to that of a SET or tube amplifier. The IDEM's signature is truly one of "little to no character."
To be perfectly honest, if I had never experienced the unique transparency of the Stellavox, the Soulution 717 would undoubtedly be my amplifier of choice for the rest of my life. However, I did hear the Stellavox and I am hooked.
Mike,

many thanks for these further insights into the Stellavox, and especially to highlight the differences between the Soulution 717 and the Stellavox IDEM. of course, i've not heard the 717, but your description of it is very positive. it's tempting to try and look at the technology of each amplifier and try and connect dots. i will leave that to others. the 'why' is just not that important to me to worry about it. my personal amplifier sonic priorities match the attributes you describe with the IDEM.

  • IDEM: Provides a more natural, relaxed, and organic listening experience, embodying an extreme neutrality with a transparency often likened to that of a SET or tube amplifier. The IDEM's signature is truly one of "little to no character."

i am very much excited to hear the Stellavox in my system with your words just echoing my conversation with Gideon.
 
Mike,

many thanks for these further insights into the Stellavox, and especially to highlight the differences between the Soulution 717 and the Stellavox IDEM. of course, i've not heard the 717, but your description of it is very positive. it's tempting to try and look at the technology of each amplifier and try and connect dots. i will leave that to others. the 'why' is just not that important to me to worry about it. my personal amplifier sonic priorities match the attributes you describe with the IDEM.

  • IDEM: Provides a more natural, relaxed, and organic listening experience, embodying an extreme neutrality with a transparency often likened to that of a SET or tube amplifier. The IDEM's signature is truly one of "little to no character."

i am very much excited to hear the Stellavox in my system with your words just echoing my conversation with Gideon.
Intriguing...
 
(...)

The comparison of the 717 to the IDEM is interesting

  • The 717s deliver a highly detailed, controlled, and authoritative sound. It is unequivocally solid-state in its ability to grip the speakers and reveal micro-dynamics with speed yet is one of the most musically compelling solid-state amplifiers. Is character is clearly “Bottom up”
  • IDEM: Provides a more natural, relaxed, and organic listening experience, embodying an extreme neutrality with a transparency often likened to that of a SET or tube amplifier. The IDEM's signature is truly one of "little to no character."
To be perfectly honest, if I had never experienced the unique transparency of the Stellavox, the Soulution 717 would undoubtedly be my amplifier of choice for the rest of my life. However, I did hear the Stellavox and I am hooked.

Thanks for the detailed answer. It surely triggers my curiosity, but I should remember that I have read similar comments on my VTL Siegfried II versus the Lamm ML3 and I preferred the Siegfried's in the long term.

Unfortunately it seems that audiophiles from the european community are not a priority for the IDEM, we will have to wait.
 
Mike,
(...) my personal amplifier sonic priorities match the attributes you describe with the IDEM.

  • IDEM: Provides a more natural, relaxed, and organic listening experience, embodying an extreme neutrality with a transparency often likened to that of a SET or tube amplifier. The IDEM's signature is truly one of "little to no character."

i am very much excited to hear the Stellavox in my system with your words just echoing my conversation with Gideon.

IMO the Dartzeel's are not SET or tube sounding at all, and you clearly preferred the Dartzeels to these amps in past. Why do you expect something approaching their sound to please you better? I am really curious to read about your listening experience - particularly with your Wadax ... ;)
 
IMO the Dartzeel's are not SET or tube sounding at all, and you clearly preferred the Dartzeels to these amps in past. Why do you expect something approaching their sound to please you better? I am really curious to read about your listening experience - particularly with your Wadax ... ;)
i have my own opinion about how the darTZeel 468's sound or don't sound in my system. and Mike's perspective about how the IDEM's sound is his. and you have your own perspective on the darTZeel models you have had in your system.

the 468's are different from other darts. @vinyl_mike has a dart 108 model two sitting there in his room between the two IDEM's so when i spoke to him on the phone that subject came up. we are both curious about how the IDEM/468 compare in my room might go.

i've owned the Tenor 75 watt OTL and the Lamm ML3's and had other tube amps in my system and, compared to other solid state, i do view the dart's as tube-like in aspects of their presentation. just my opinion. we will have to see about how the IDEM fits into that. in what ways does the IDEM resemble tubes, and it what ways does it not resemble tubes? will the 468's have more bloom? will the 468's be more liquid? will the 468's be as pure and not there? both amplifiers have zero global feedback. the 468's have minimal pieces in the signal path and minimal protection circuits for ultimate purity. how does the IDEM do those things? don't know.

should be fun.
 
thank you so much for posting about your experience. I can only imagine how incredible both Soulution and Stellavox sound.

As many of us can only dream to be able to compare such high caliber amps back to back, can you share how you were able to audition the 717’s (which just made landfall in the last two months) and the Stellavox in such short order? Did you purchase the 717’s only to be smitten with the Stellavox and have to sell the 717s at a loss? I can’t imagine eating a clear $30-50k? loss. Just very curious on how you were able to do it as I/many here would love to as well

For clarity, I’m a retail customer of AudioArts. I have owned Soulution electronics for over a year, and they are exceptional. Yes, I had the 717s for only a short time in my system, but ultimately I decided on Stellavox which I found superior. Gideon was able to put together a package that included other equipment - the deal worked for me and worked for him. I’m a happy client and I thank Gideon for his flexibility on this transaction.
 
Design and Aesthetics
The Stellavox IDEM is surprisingly compact, notably smaller than I anticipated from photos, standing approximately 16 inches high and 7 inches wide. While it exudes Swiss precision in its build, it is not a statement-making visual presence like components from D’Agostino, Gryphon, or darTZeel. A minimalist aesthetic is maintained with a single, multi-function on/off button/indicator light on the top panel. The majority of the rear is devoted to a substantial heat sink, which is necessary given that the unit runs quite warm, registering over 130+ F at the heat sinks once it reaches its stable operating temperature after approximately one to two hours. The rear panel also features robust and secure speaker binding posts distinguished by unusual blue and red coloration, and a gain control, which was set to its minimum position for all initial listening. Visually understated, the IDEM's "Clark Kent exterior" belies a truly special and, in my estimation, groundbreaking amplifier.

Realism and Emotional Engagement
Echoing the initial observations by Myles Astor, the IDEM's core strength lies in its ability to deliver an unmatched sense of realism. With reference-quality recordings, the amplifier allows the listener to suspend disbelief, creating the rare and fleeting sensation that the musical event is physically occurring in the room. This "goosebump factor" is intensely emotional, transforming listening into an intimate, visceral experience. With a variety of well recorded sources - including Ed Pong’s tape of violinist Tatsuki Nurita, Miles Davis's Kind of Blue (tape), Laurie Lieberman's Truly (vinyl), and Greg Brown’s Poets Game (vinyl) - the IDEM consistently delivered timbral accuracy and purity that made the performers appear briefly present.

Transparency
Gideon has stressed their lack of inherent sonic character, a claim my listening tests confirmed. Unlike most components which in my opinion, possess a definable "sound" (be it "forward," "laid-back," "top-down," etc.), the IDEM defied initial attempts at sonic categorization. Having recently had Goldmund, Tenor, darTZeel and several Soulution amps in my system, each delivered a different “sound.” Conversely, the IDEM is unique in its lack of “sound” personality. Early listening led to a moment of concern, fearing a potential top-end roll-off or lack of deep bass. However, as the music’s complexity and dynamic range expanded, the amplifier simply mirrored the music, blooming into a compelling aural narrative. At times they remind me of pure class A amplifiers – but with speed, drive and PRaT. While I am certainly not an engineer, but perhaps the lack of op amps and lack of feedback combined with extreme high current could be part of the magic.

And if you are wondering, yes, they can rock and shake the foundation. See my You Tube video.
The IDEM in my system

The IDEM serves as a clear, uncolored window into the recording, reflecting everything thrown at it, from the delicate articulation of Tatsuki Nurita’s violin to the bombastic conclusion of Led Zeppelin's "Stairway to Heaven," without imposing a singular sonic fingerprint. This level of transparency recalls the memory of my legendary Tenor OTL 75 amplifiers - a device that, until now, held the gold standard in my experience for "removing the veils" and revealing spectacular detail and nuance.

While not an OTL clone, the IDEM achieves a similar purity and freedom from phase-induced distortions. Its transparency allows for precise, deep, and layered imaging, revealing the subtle interplay between instruments and capturing low-level information that is typically lost or blurred. However, unlike the sonic profile of classic OTL designs, the IDEM pairs this purity with an immensely powerful, textured, and well-defined low end. With the ability to deliver 700 watts into a 2 Ω load, the amp offers virtually unlimited power, current, and stability. In summary, as Gideon has noted, the IDEM sound can be conceptualized as merging the purity of an OTL or Triode with the mid-range transparency of the original Quad ESL-57.

Immersion and Intimacy
My typical metrics for emotional engagement—including freedom from listening fatigue and the "goosebump effect"—were spectacularly satisfied. Marathon listening sessions (up to six hours) left me exhilarated, not drained. Listening becomes immersive and intimate - less an act of passively hearing music and more a focused, exclusive experience of the performance.

The IDEM's presentation is direct and emotionally engaging. It allows the listener to delve deep into the mix, not through artificial resolution enhancement, but by rendering the natural interplay between notes, musicians, and the subtleties of the production. Having heard familiar recordings literally hundreds of times, the discovery of new textures and low-level information is astonishing.

Initial Conclusion
The Stellavox IDEM’s sound is transparent with no intrinsic character representing a significant shift from components designed to offer a more "exciting," "warm," or "lush" sonic signature. For me, who previously voiced my system toward an "exciting musical involvement," the IDEM is a profound change, offering a clear window that is musically involving precisely because of its unparalleled accuracy and transparency.

More to come as I get a better handle on the amps.
View attachment 160621View attachment 160622
After several weeks of listening, I made an interesting observation. On the back of the Stellavox amps, there’s a gain control marked in decibels. During installation, Gideon matched the gain of the IDEMs to roughly that of my Soulution amps. He told me, “Let them break in for a while, then play around with the gain control - you’ll be surprised.”
Gain control.jpg
Honestly, I didn’t expect much. But, knowing Gideon’s track record, I gave it a try. And yes, I was surprised. When I reduced the gain to the lowest setting of14 dB, the sound noticeably improved. The presentation became more liquid, more transparent, and imaging snapped into sharper focus.
Gain Scale.jpg
To be sure, I did a blind test with another experienced listener. We matched the volume levels precisely using a meter. Without knowing which setting was which, they consistently chose the lowest gain. Their comment? “It’s like the music just turned to technicolor — you can see deeper into the performance.”

That description resonated. It reminded me of my experience with the VTL S-400, which has a switch to go from tetrode to triode. In that amp, flipping to triode brought a similar increase in liquidity, but it also changed the overall character of the sound. It softened things and, to my ears, slowed the music down a bit. The Stellavox didn’t do that. It didn’t alter the character, it simply enhanced it.

The only Issue is that it causes me to use my Soulution preamp near its highest volume settings. This works – the Soulution has ultra-low noise, however depending upon your preamp YMMV.

So, for now, this is just another data point in the journey. More listening ahead, and more impressions to come.
 
After several weeks of listening, I made an interesting observation. On the back of the Stellavox amps, there’s a gain control marked in decibels. During installation, Gideon matched the gain of the IDEMs to roughly that of my Soulution amps. He told me, “Let them break in for a while, then play around with the gain control - you’ll be surprised.”
View attachment 161359
Honestly, I didn’t expect much. But, knowing Gideon’s track record, I gave it a try. And yes, I was surprised. When I reduced the gain to the lowest setting of14 dB, the sound noticeably improved. The presentation became more liquid, more transparent, and imaging snapped into sharper focus.
View attachment 161360
To be sure, I did a blind test with another experienced listener. We matched the volume levels precisely using a meter. Without knowing which setting was which, they consistently chose the lowest gain. Their comment? “It’s like the music just turned to technicolor — you can see deeper into the performance.”

That description resonated. It reminded me of my experience with the VTL S-400, which has a switch to go from tetrode to triode. In that amp, flipping to triode brought a similar increase in liquidity, but it also changed the overall character of the sound. It softened things and, to my ears, slowed the music down a bit. The Stellavox didn’t do that. It didn’t alter the character, it simply enhanced it.

The only Issue is that it causes me to use my Soulution preamp near its highest volume settings. This works – the Soulution has ultra-low noise, however depending upon your preamp YMMV.

So, for now, this is just another data point in the journey. More listening ahead, and more impressions to come.
thanks Mike, and this is a subject i have been thinking about as i anticipate delivery of the IDEM's. appreciate you doing the work and describing your process.

some random thoughts.

right now i have 8 different sources, and variables of media gain all over the place. i have tapes where the dart pre is at -23db to -4db or -5db as correct, and vinyl where i'm as high as +4db to +5db sometimes. i have two cartridges using my 1:15 SUT that are in one range, and another using my 1:50 SUT in another range. i have dxd and 4xdsd files needing relatively high gain settings in one range, all the way to redbook files typically needing much less....then CD's a little different too.

my dart preamp has a particularly linear and pure processor driven, passive analog optical coupler volume attenuation and so it's superb at every volume i have used in my experience. i have my dart 468's set at 32db gain, and there is a 26db gain setting for very high efficiency horns. the dart pre has 96db of variation in -192- .5db steps. from +11db to -85db. so it does stay in that +5db to -25db range for my listening.

yes; my dart pre can offset gain per input, but since the media is all over the place anyway, better to keep all sources consistent and not chase that part i think. i anticipate the gain settings sufficiently to be comfortable not having an unfortunate event.....so far so good. the Mk1 dart pre had no db readout screen, and i did have some drama with that a few times. but no smoke or broken mid range ceramic drivers or blown tweeters.

i think my Evolution Acoustics MM7's 97db 7ohm efficiency should allow me to use the lowest gain setting on the IDEM's, especially running XLR. my typical listening is in the 65db-70db to high 70db range, peaks mid 80's for most of my listening, but sometimes get into the 75db-high 80's with peaks over 90db for more of a 'live' music presentation. very occasionally a little higher.

reading your above comments, it's occurred to me to try the 468's 26db gain setting to see what i think about it. but i hate to approach the +11db gain limit of the preamp. i assume that the input offset in the dart pre only goes down, not up. never investigated.

anyway great to hear your experience on this subject, and look forward to going down that road. and i especially wonder whether i might 'ride' those IDEM gain settings at all to optimize certain media and sources. that's much easier than messing with the preamp input gain settings.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: vinyl_mike
Yes it probably depends on your preamp. Here I slightly increased the gain or else the dynamics suffered. The less expensive Soulution preamplifier doesn't have adjustable gain.
 
Last edited:
There seems to be inconsistency here. Maybe not everyone got the talking points.

In one post they are described as sounding like nothing - this year's version of a straight wire etc.

In the next post they are described as sounding like various tube amps.

I am sure they sound great - the people raving about them here are true audiophiles.

But, I wish we could hear a bit more balance? What don't they do great? What are the relative weaknesses?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ctydwn
There seems to be inconsistency here. Maybe not everyone got the talking points.

In one post they are described as sounding like nothing - this year's version of a straight wire etc.

In the next post they are described as sounding like various tube amps.

I am sure they sound great - the people raving about them here are true audiophiles.

But, I wish we could hear a bit more balance? What don't they do great? What are the relative weaknesses?
The terms “neutral” and “no character” are thrown around and applied to equipment from $5,000 to $105,000. Frankly I’m not sure whether those terms have any relatable objective (subjective?) meaning. Therefore, the closest comparison that I can articulate, was to that of OTL/SET amplifiers. Obviously the Stellavox is neither. However, that to me is a starting point to understand its character. Of course, other opinions may vary.

As to weaknesses, as I continue my journey, I will absolutely post any negative observations. At this point the only thing that has surprised me is the heat, 135F at idle and 140+F at high volume. This is pushing into pure Class A territory, and it's certainly warms up the room.
 
There seems to be inconsistency here. Maybe not everyone got the talking points.

In one post they are described as sounding like nothing - this year's version of a straight wire etc.

In the next post they are described as sounding like various tube amps.

I am sure they sound great - the people raving about them here are true audiophiles.

But, I wish we could hear a bit more balance? What don't they do great? What are the relative weaknesses?

I suspect what Vinyl Mike is pointing to is the holy grail of amplification: gear that “gets out of the way” and simply lets the music shine. Top-tier SET tube amps often have this quality—they create a sense of consistency and realism. When you listen to a good live analogue recording through them, it can genuinely feel as if you’re at the venue. The amp disappears, and you’re no longer listening to a system; you’re at the show. A good amplifier has that quality …

That said, I haven’t heard the Stellavox myself yet. I’m arranging an in-depth listening session with Gideon, and once I’ve had some proper time with it, I’ll report back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike Lavigne
I suspect what Vinyl Mike is pointing to is the holy grail of amplification: gear that “gets out of the way” and simply lets the music shine. Top-tier SET tube amps often have this quality—they create a sense of consistency and realism. When you listen to a good live analogue recording through them, it can genuinely feel as if you’re at the venue. The amp disappears, and you’re no longer listening to a system; you’re at the show. A good amplifier has that quality …

That said, I haven’t heard the Stellavox myself yet. I’m arranging an in-depth listening session with Gideon, and once I’ve had some proper time with it, I’ll report back.
Great...look forward to hearing more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike Lavigne
I had the 717s for only a short time in my system, but ultimately I decided on Stellavox which I found superior.
Hello Mike,

I am excited for Mike Lavigne to compare Stellavox side-by-side with the long incumbent 468 in his own system in a leisurely time frame. That's the gold standard way to conduct an audition!

For what period of time were you able to compare the 717s side-by-side with the Stellavoxes in your own system to come to the conclusion that you found the Stellavox "superior"?

Gideon was able to put together a package that included other equipment - the deal worked for me and worked for him. I’m a happy client and I thank Gideon for his flexibility on this transaction.
This is a great outcome, Mike! Ultimately what matters most from the point of view of us hobbyists is dealers like Gideon making their clients happy. Kudos to Gideon!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kvali1
Therefore, the closest comparison that I can articulate, was to that of OTL/SET amplifiers.
This is good to know that your natural sound/sublime sound template is an OTL/SET
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing