@Taiko Audio Emile, could you please kindly further clarify the issue of the reported SQ degradation from the existence of an internal storage based on your latest view? Let's me quote your/Taiko's view on the subject matter below first. Taiko's latest Olympus Introduction and FAQ document (v034, dated Oct 9), pp. 38-39, has a long answer to the question. To quote: " Update 21-05-2024: Adding an internal music drive no longer degrades SQ. Network based playback is still slightly ahead, by about 1%, IF you own the Router/Switch/DCD with a good quality power supply. If you don’t, local playback is superior, easily 10-15% better." Specifically, "Provided the Extreme Router is used, local storage file playback quality is not inferior to router + network sourced playback files, it’s basically equal"; "The NAS SQ will be 1-2% better than an internal storage (U.2/U.3) with router/switch/DCD. (The Router alone is mostly responsible for this, while the switch/dcd allow for a degree of “voicing” to taste)"; "Adding an internal storage drive to the Olympus very slightly degrades overall SQ compared to using no storage and using only a NAS. However, it is nothing huge, but you can hear a tiny difference on a highly resolving system. We’d rate this at a 1-2% impact, not enough to actually worry about"; "Local playback is not affected by the Router; Streaming / NAS playback is affected by router." The conclusion: "What it boils down to is 2 scenarios: 1) If you have the Taiko Router -> everything sounds about the same; 2) If you don’t have the Taiko Router -> local files sound best."
Based on your views stated above, I decided to have internal storage for a variety of reasons (I never have any use for online services like Qobus or Tidal, would love to dispense with the expensive Router (I applaud your candor and transparency displayed in the above statements), and make life simple), having no reason to worry about 1-2% SQ difference. But ray-dude reported a very significant or audible SQ degradation from the presence of internal HD. Understand the caveat that we all have different ears and systems (e.g., unlike him, I always found file format in excess of 24/96 or DSD64 inferior with Extreme). While I have a big and growing library (currently around 15TB), I do not plan to store such big library either internally or on a NAS (if that's the way to go); I will limit my active library around 4-7TB. I always have PCM files uncompressed to WAV (for having heard an audible difference). Could you please share your latest view on the subject matter? If the non-installation of internal storage is Taiko's recommended way (the improvement to local storage has to be over 2%), I am open to such prospect. Same caveat about personal preferences. Thanks in advance.
Based on your views stated above, I decided to have internal storage for a variety of reasons (I never have any use for online services like Qobus or Tidal, would love to dispense with the expensive Router (I applaud your candor and transparency displayed in the above statements), and make life simple), having no reason to worry about 1-2% SQ difference. But ray-dude reported a very significant or audible SQ degradation from the presence of internal HD. Understand the caveat that we all have different ears and systems (e.g., unlike him, I always found file format in excess of 24/96 or DSD64 inferior with Extreme). While I have a big and growing library (currently around 15TB), I do not plan to store such big library either internally or on a NAS (if that's the way to go); I will limit my active library around 4-7TB. I always have PCM files uncompressed to WAV (for having heard an audible difference). Could you please share your latest view on the subject matter? If the non-installation of internal storage is Taiko's recommended way (the improvement to local storage has to be over 2%), I am open to such prospect. Same caveat about personal preferences. Thanks in advance.