May I ask who is REG ?I saw this picture before and was semi-mortified. This is REG's room right? Having read his reviews for many years, I would have never guessed this was his room. I think I asked someone if he fell on hard times.
May I ask who is REG ?I saw this picture before and was semi-mortified. This is REG's room right? Having read his reviews for many years, I would have never guessed this was his room. I think I asked someone if he fell on hard times.
Andre & DaveyF,
I'm sorry, for taking this thread OT, especially since I'm the OP.
It should only be about HP and his contributions to the world of HiEnd audio, not the Harbeths or any other speakers.
....
Easy one. 70,000 could easily be a lot smarter than 7 million people, if they are diverse - not superficially diverse, but intellectually diverse.
Obviously it works on wonders on his dealers and reviewers.
Helps put our little 'hobby' into perspective, in terms of the size of the market.
So, this takes us back to the need for long-term loans to extract the most from the equipment (with which I tend to agree, based on my own experience).
Short term loans are easy, at least from manufacturers willing to submit their products to a review process.* And, I suspect that private owners might be willing to loan their gear for a short time for a review, so long as they were comfortable that it wouldn't get banged up or abused.
______________________
*This assumes that the reviewing process subjects the gear to real scrutiny and is not simply another form of marketing.
..but not demographically diverse, right? Most of these 70,000 will be males, white, and over 40? No?
Circulations: Stereophile = 70K
Circulations: Stereophile = 70K, Car&Driver = 1.3M, Cons Rpts = 7M+
I don't know what the ratios of fixed-to-variable costs are for each, but the economies of scale are vastly different.
If SP or TAS had $70M+ in revenue, they could just buy their review equipment (and then sell it on A'gon!).
Bob
and let's not forget Vivid Audio who I think deserve more exposure from reviewers....DaveyF, that is exactly what has happened to me. I listened to Magico many, many times, in different rooms, with different amps, etc., and I intellectually understand why people like it, but don't emotionally connect to Magico.
I know a lot of guys run their Magicos with warm amps, including Harley. But no matter how much you try to cuddle with a cold-blooded lizard, that reptile is not going to turn into your dog. So I think a lot of this praise is undeserved. I know they are successful and many people like them. I think that's great. God bless those people. Life is a bitch, and if you can find something that makes it even a teeny, teeny bit better, you should go for it. But there are dozens and dozens of other hard working gear manufacturers who have been ignored due to Magico sucking up the air. Now I wouldn't go with a box speaker. I like open designs like Nola, MBL, stats, etc. If I did it would be TAD. But take the other metal box speaker, YG. Their Carmel or Kipod sounds much more natural than a Magico when run with tubes. And still the Magico gets the constant praise!
and let's not forget Vivid Audio who I think deserve more exposure from reviewers....
and let's not forget Vivid Audio who I think deserve more exposure from reviewers....
Is that taken from Stereophile's latest published and audited (which TAS's isn't) circulation statement or a guess?
I suspect the Home Theater mags have a far bigger circulation.
...This stuff hurts everyone in the hobby.
That's right. I happen to think that the Vivid Giya is one of the world's great loudspeakers. And with TAS posturing their gear as a "king magico" and its subjects, who wants to send in a speaker and be labeled as a "#1" or "#2" contender", when at that level it's all a matter of relative strengths and weaknesses and personal preference? This stuff hurts everyone in the hobby.
Wow. No idea it was that few. For reference, more people than that applied to get into Berkeley this year, and there are about 1million people on the terrorist watch list. What matters of course is how much do these 70K people spend on high end audio equipment, but irrespectively the number is shockingly low. I suspect the Home Theater mags have a far bigger circulation.
I think demographics (I called it superficial diversity) don't matter at all if you are interested in problem solving. Social category membership (e.g., gender, race, ethnicity, age, physical disabilities) and things like social status (e.g., tenure, socioeconomic) don’t matter one bit. In fact they hurt our hobby, resulting in group think. What’s more important for problem solving is psychological and cognitive diversity. Things like knowledge or skills (education, practical knowledge, expertise, training, experience, abilities). Also, important are values or beliefs (e.g., cultural backgrounds, ideological beliefs) and personality differences (mood, motivation, musical tastes).
What you are looking for, really, are dissenting opinions. That’s why in a post above I said that all expert opinions should be averaged to eliminate biases.
5 reviewers listening to small scale and female vocals music will miss critical aspects of a component’s sonic signature. That's exactly happened what happened to Magico Q5 reviews, until Fremer reviewed it and played rock on it.
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |