Micro, I am totally w you on this
It's just downright frustrating to spend valuable time writing a post, from the PoV as a dyed in the wool vinylphile, showing the zigzagging evolution and preferences for analog over digital, digital over analog and current SOTA jostling for position to be just told, bah, well set up analog is king and that's it
Plenty would reasonably disagree
By design or by accident, I've ended up with analog and digital players that converge SQ rather than diverging
My tt rig is the most linear, fastest and leanest one yet I've owned, a direct result of adjustment to my Emm Labs CDSA SE period
This cdp started to get me listening to more digital than analog, so that my next tt had to compare to it favourably
That my tt did was a result of me listening to and rejecting quite a few well respected belt drives and settling on rim drive/air bearing arm
The heft of good analog remained, and this then inspired me to try and get a "wetter" sounding cdp than the Emm, which I achieved going to the Eera w the invaluable help of JackD201
I may be one of the only few audiophiles who tried to find a tt w attributes of the best digital, and then changed their digital to converge on a happy medium
So, for me it remains a no brainer that well set up analog always seems to steal a march on excellent digital, but I've actively tried to find what I like about digital more than analog in my various upgrades and system evolution landmarks, and incorporate that in both mediums
Looks like Mike has too in probably a different and more extravagant fashion than me