Benchmark AHB2 Amplifier

tmallin

WBF Technical Expert
May 19, 2010
797
263
455
69
Chicagoland
If you've been looking at my other recent threads (Oppo, Benchmark, Auralic, Harbeth) you'll know that I'm now using a pair of Benchmark AHB2 amps in bridged mono configuration to drive my speakers, the Harbeth Monitor 40.2. To my mind, these are unquestionably the best sounding and performing amps I've owned. As indicated in my post about the audio equipment I've owned, I've owned a few amps in my time before the Benchmarks, including:

Integrated Amps

Dynaco SCA-35 (my first amp and the only pure-tube component I've ever owned)
AR Amplifier (the ideal amp for Dynaquad surround because of its built-in difference circuit--owned twice, once during college and then again to drive vintage AR speakers)
Pioneer SA 9100
Lyngdorf TDAI-2170 (magnificent except for the RoomPerfect)

Receivers

Sony something from the 1980s. It lasted for 20+ years in my bedroom system and never sounded anything other than very good in that context.
Denon AVR5800 (basement home theater system)
Harmon Kardon something (nice sounding in den system until it overheated and failed)
Denon AVR something (den system--okay, but not as good sounding as the HK had been)
Arcam AVR600 (probably the best sounding receiver made to that point in time)

Power Amps

Audionics CC-2 (2)
Amber ST-70
Threshold SA-300
Mark Levinson No.23
Audio by Van Alstine FET-Valve 500 (2)
Cello Duet
Bryston 7B-ST (4)
Bryston 7B-SST (4)
Sanders Magtech Monos (4)
Lyngdorf SA-2400

The list of speakers I've owned and driven with those amps is longer yet. I've also auditioned at stores and shows many other "contenders" before purchasing what I did.

But I feel extremely confident now that I've used the Benchmarks for months now that the AHB2, at least in the bridged mono mode that I use them, is absolutely the finest sounding and otherwise performing power amplifier I know of. Prior reviews by others of the AHB2 are very helpful in describing the product and talking about its sound or lack thereof. I refer readers particularly to the reviews by:

The Absolute Sound
Stereophile
Enjoy the Music

Those reviews basically correctly describe the subjective sound of this amplifier, I think, especially Greg Weaver's early review for Enjoy the Music.

You should also take a look at Benchmark's own measurements and discussion of the THX Achromatic Audio Amplifier (AAA) circuit used in this amp. Benchmark is uniquely forthcoming and detailed about the measurable performance of all its products and this amp is no exception. The measured results published by others (e.g., Stereophile) bear out the honesty and in fact conservative nature of Benchmark's own evaluation and specifications. In terms of Benchmark's literature, see:

AHB Technology (then click on the Technology tab)
Links to Reviews
AHB2 Instruction Manual—performance plots start on page 26
Application Notes
Balanced vs. Unbalanced An alog Interfaces
The Importance of Star-Quad Microphone Cable
Benchmark Speaker Cable – NL2 to Banana – 2 Pole

Amp Set Up

I use three-foot-long Benchmark Studio&Stage Starquad XLR Cable for Analog Audio to feed sound to the AHB2s directly from my Benchmark DAC-3 HGC with its digital volume control. At the moment, there is no intervening preamp. That will change with the addition of the coming-in-June Benchmark HPA4, an all-analog unit which will bypass the DAC's digital volume control in favor of the relay gain control in the new unit, which will drive both the AHB2s and my Audeze LCD-4 headphones.

The speaker cables are the six-foot-long Benchmark Speaker Cable – NL2 to Banana- 2 Pole which have heavy-duty 40-amp SpeakOn connectors at the amp end and locking banana plugs at the speaker end. These are the only cables which Benchmark certifies as being able to deliver the amp's power to speakers with the rated noise and distortion figures. In Benchmark's words:

The SpeakON™ connectors provide a reliable low-impedance connection that can withstand high-currents. Of the more traditional speaker connectors, we have found that locking banana plugs provide the next best connections. In contrast, spade lugs and pins often provide poor connections. Spring-type (non-locking) banana plugs almost always provide poor connections and should be avoided.

The Benchmark AHB2 power amplifier is so clean that poor speaker connections can easily create more distortion than the entire power amplifier. We have seen this many times in the lab. The effects of poor speaker connections can easily be measured when testing the AHB2 power amplifier. We have learned that we cannot accurately measure the AHB2 unless we use SpeakON™ connectors or high-quality locking banana connectors.

SpeakON™ connectors also provide convenience and safety. No speaker connector is easier to use, they cannot short out, and they cannot give you a shock.

I do not use cables with SpeakON connections at both ends for the simple reason that my Harbeth M40.2 speaker binding posts are not compatible with the SpeakON connections but are eminently suited to locking bananas. Most audiophile-oriented speakers are not equipped with the SpeakOn jacks, which are very common on pro-audio-oriented speakers. The only speakers I've ever owned which had SpeakOn connections are the Gradient 1.5 Helsinki.

I use the stock power cords which came with the Benchmark amps. They are a special locking design which locks the IEC end into the IEC jack on the back of the amp to prevent accidental disconnection.

Each of the two AHB2 amps sits on its stock feet, centered near the front on a 4-inch-thick Mapleshade solid natural maple platform. Between the platform and the wood floor are three Mapleshade Isoblock 1 footers, one under each front corner and one in the center back of the platform. This arrangement leaves enough room behind each amp for cable dressing so as to avoid contact with the hard foam diffusors behind the amps. None of the speaker cables, interconnects or power cables contact the carpeting.

The amps are both fed from a single 20-amp dedicated circuit feeding this system through a single quad outlet. The line level equipment is fed from another dedicated 20-amp circuit quad outlet. All accessible non-soldered connections are treated with Caig Deoxit Gold G100L brush-on liquid contact enhancer.

The top plate of the amp rings a bit in response to the tap-it-with-my-fingernail test. I damp this with an issue of The Absolute Sound placed atop it.

Aesthetic Qualities

As other reviewers have noted, the first impression is how small this thing is, considering its rated power. It is handsomely finished without looking over-the-top elegant or trying too hard to impress the owner with an overly thick faceplate. The amp is very solid feeling, like a brick, with very uniform weight distribution. The back panel is fairly crowded, but given the recommended-by-Benchmark type of connections I'm using (Benchmark XLR, stock power cord, and Benchmark speaker cables with SpeakOn connectors), the back panel is more than commodious for making such connections.

The amps run only slightly warm to the touch on the heatsinks. This is even with the magazine atop the cover. There is no audible hum or other mechanical noise coming from the chassis.

Sonic Qualities

Inaudible noise: For the first time ever in my more than 50 years of experience with audio systems, there is absolutely no audible noise coming from the speakers with my ear pressed against any of the speaker drivers in a quiet room. No buzz, hum, hiss—nada! This is with an active digital source that is either paused or not playing music, at any setting of the DAC-3 HGC volume control from full mute to wide open.

All other set-ups I've ever owned produced at least some background hiss/hum/buzz with this test. One system I had (which shall remain nameless) produced so much quiescent hiss that I could hear it when I entered the listening room! This is a testament both to the inherently low noise of the combination of the DAC-3 HGC plus AHB2, the proper Benchmark XLR interconnects and speaker cables, plus the proper gain structuring of the active electronic components.

In this context, proper gain structuring means maximizing the signal-to-noise-and-distortion ratio at the loudspeaker input terminals. To do this, you basically run the front-end components as "hot" as possible, voltage-wise, without clipping any device's output or the following input, and then apply the minimum gain in your amplifier to allow the amp to produce just a bit more than its rated output into the speakers with the system volume control (the volume control of the DAC-3 HGC) set at maximum.

To do this, with the Benchmark DAC-3 HGC, you eliminate any output pads by moving, if necessary, some jumpers inside the chassis. Then, on the back panel of the AHB2, you set the amplifier gain/sensitivity control to its minimum level of 22 dBu (the lowest position of the three-position switch.)

The use of all-balanced connections and truly balanced internal electronics in the Benchmark equipment surely also contributes to this, as discussed in the Balanced vs. Unbalanced Analog Interfaces link. Also contributing, I'm sure, is the use of star-quad interconnecting wire in the Benchmark XLR interconnects and speaker cables, such cable being the only type which can successfully lower magnetic field interference, as discussed in The Importance of Star-Quad Microphone Cable link.

The sonic consequence of the absolute absence of audible background electronic noise is that all the low-level detail present in any recording is fully presented since the sound to noise and distortion level of the electronics is greater than that in the recording and is thus not the limiting factor. The electronics thus cannot mask or distort the program source. Reverberant tails of concert hall ambiance, for instance, last longer than with any other amps in my experience. With suitable program material (that lacking inherent recorded background hiss or other electronic or venue noise) the background is supremely black.

A few commenters feel that comparing the noise/distortion level produced by the Benchmark AHB2 amp to that of other amps is not fair since it is not an apples-to-apples comparison. The Benchmark, when set up for proper gain structure, has much lower gain than most other amps. Setting it up for the higher gain of most consumer amps would reduce or even possibly eliminate its edge in quietness.

Such arguments are beside the point. Most consumer amps do not allow proper gain structuring at all since they have no way to adjust the sensitivity of the amplifier. If the amplifier doesn't need more than a low amount of gain to produce its rated output when driven by a properly "hot" source, why make or set up the amp with more gain than needed? All that accomplishes is lowering the designed sound-to-noise-and-distortion ratio and create the real possibility of input clipping at the amplifier. It is not Benchmark's fault that most consumer front-end electronics are not capable of producing the suitably "hot" pro-audio-level voltages without clipping their outputs and therefore cannot be used with the AHB2's low sensitivity input setting. Most consumer audio front-end electronics produce about 2 volts out from an unbalanced analog output, and about 4 volts out from balanced outputs. Benchmark's DAC-3 HGC produces the much-higher-yet pro-audio level of +24 dBu out.

Uncolored response: I hear no frequency response issues whatsoever. Program material varies a lot from one program to another with no detectable "cast" which might be caused by coloration of the electronics. See the comments in the Enjoy the Music review.

This detail retrieval I talk about above is true, that is, these amps truly reveal more recorded detail than others. The audible detail is not enhanced by any added brightness in the upper ranges. Instruments all sound as they should in the mids and highs and the bass is a remarkable combination of control, depth, and fullness—just right.

More than enough power: While not rated as high in power as, say, the Sanders Magtech Monoblocs I once owned, the bridged AHB2s sound at least as powerful into the Harbeth M40-series speakers as those Sanders amps. There is an easy, rock-solid quality to the sound unequalled by any other amps I've owned. The dynamic range seems altogether superior to that of the Sanders, probably because of the vastly lower noise level of the AHB2s. The stock combination of the Sanders amps and Harbeth M40.1 speakers produced hiss/hum from the speakers audible from a couple of feet away.

My Harbeth M40.2 speakers show audible signs of stress far before the amplifier runs out of steam. Even the levels at which the speakers begin to show signs of stress are far beyond what I can listen to comfortably without ear plugs for more than a few moments.

Three-dimensionality: Unequaled in my experience, pure and simple. Rock solid and rounded images; wide, deep, and stable staging; fully developed height illusion; finely graduated depth perspective.

Shortcomings?

The quibbles noted at the end of the Enjoy the Music review are actually strengths of the design. First, the lack of inclusion of single-ended inputs is intentional so as to strongly encourage the user to use balanced connections in order to take full advantage of the low-noise-and-distortion capabilities of the amplifier. See the discussion in the Balanced vs. Unbalanced Analog Interfaces Benchmark application note mentioned above.

Second, the difficulty of using the safety series WBT speaker cable binding posts on the back of the amp with spade lugs is of no consequence if you are using Benchmark's recommended connection methods. For best sound/lowest measurable distortion with this amp, Benchmark recommends using as the best choice the SpeakON connectors, and as a second choice, locking banana plug connectors. Benchmark's literature specifically mentions that spade lugs cannot be relied on to deliver a low distortion signal at high power levels; see the above quote from the Benchmark literature about this point.



Conclusion

There is actually very little to say, sonically, about the Benchmark AHB2. As far as I can detect, it does nothing wrong and more right than any other amp I have ever heard or owned. As other reviewers have said, nothing made by the hands of man can be perfect, but these amps, for all practical purposes, are as close to perfection as one could want and far closer than most others. An admirable achievement at a price which, while certainly not cheap, seems very fair for what you get.
 
Last edited:

Folsom

VIP/Donor
Oct 26, 2015
5,668
1,221
375
Eastern WA
I heard them in a room at Axpona. They are very nice amps.
 

bazelio

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2016
2,198
1,416
280
California
From what I understand, for those who eschew open distortion, then AHB2 is *the* amp to get bar none. Thanks for the writeup, and I suspect the combination of cleanliness and neutrality from AHB2 with the Harbeth "Brit Fi" tonal color gives a very pleasing end result.
 

Hear Here

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2020
444
221
50
Portsmouth, UK
This old thread has been reactivated so I should perhaps add my experience of the AHB2 amp from Benchmark. Accurate - yes, quiet - exceptionally so, well-featured - yes, in particular adjustable gain, sound quality - drearily dull.

I have Avantgarde speakers and bought the Benchmark before useful reviews were available, but it was raved about by a fellow AG owner (he had Trios, I has Unos), so I just bought it. What a disappointment after having been using SETs for 12 years or so. I wanted to turn down the volume with the Benchmark - surely the kiss of death for any amp? I don't care if it's totally accurate - I want and amp that presents music with the excitement factor one gets at a live performance. I've since learnt that the fellow AG owner was obsessed with noise as his AGs are 110 dB and he was determined to find the amp with the highest signal to noise ratio.

Since then I bought or home demo'd a dozen SS amps and, though not the worst sounding, the Benchmark was in the lower half of those I tried, as far a providing an exciting listen is concerned.

I believe the OP has now moved away from his Benchmark and taken the Dutch & Dutch route. I wonder how he regards the Benchmark now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: unboxed

kswanson27

Well-Known Member
Nov 22, 2018
292
123
113
77
  • Like
Reactions: unboxed

Hear Here

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2020
444
221
50
Portsmouth, UK
Same amp. ;)
Kal - Weird isn't it that one man's meat is another man's poison when it comes to almost anything in hi-fi!

However I’m convinced that many people are very happy with their amplifiers often because they’ve not had a selection of amps in their own system over a short time period to allow a thorough comparison. I suspect that if I’d bought the Benchmark before I had other amps to compare it with, I may still be happy using it.

I think you had a hand in the Stereophile review. This was not printed till after I’d bought my unit and it makes interesting reading. You basically loved it but towards the end of the review you said:

“I took the AHB2 along with me for a weekend at our country place, in Connecticut, to see if it would be as successful with my more modest system there. That's where I discovered that my new hero amp wasn't quite perfect. Oh, its power and resolution were still not to be faulted, but through a pair of Monitor Audio Silver 8 speakers, the sound was somewhat hard and thin.”

I suspect that this amp may be more speaker dependent than many others. You found it less satisfactory in a “more modest system”. I wonder if you’d have liked it with Avantgarde speakers. Other subsequent reviewers also included similar observations about its ability or otherwise to match different speakers.

I had only my Avantgardes so no other speakers to link it to. These Uno speakers were of course very highly rated by Robert Deutsch in his excellent 15 page Stereophile review and they was selected as Stereophile’s Speaker of the Year – one of the reasons I bought them after my ATC disappointment. Not there’s a thing – both ATC and Benchmark are more involved in studio equipment than domestic. I’ve found that equipment designed for one purpose if often a little disappointing when used for the other purpose. Accuracy in the lab, that’s essential in the studio, is often not ideal in the home. I doubt the Unos measured as well as the ATC 50s but my word, they present music in a far more thrilling fashion. My subsequent Duos and now Duo XDs even more so – with a carefully chosen amplifier! After home testing a dozen amps, I chose an alternative amp that, by coincidence also ended up as Stereophile's Amplifier of the Year, overal Componant of the Year and joint Editor's Choice. Peter
 
Last edited:

Folsom

VIP/Donor
Oct 26, 2015
5,668
1,221
375
Eastern WA
Harsh? It’s your associated gear. The amp itself is so polite that it could be boring if the source wasn’t good.

I wouldn’t want to pair it with anything already well damped.
 

Kal Rubinson

Well-Known Member
May 5, 2010
2,144
468
520
NYC/CT
www.stereophile.com
Kal - Weird isn't it that one man's meat is another man's poison when it comes to almost anything in hi-fi!
I used to think so but it has long been undeniable.
I think you had a hand in the Stereophile review.
Both hands. :)
I suspect that this amp may be more speaker dependent than many others.
That may be so but it is hard to get a handle on that since (1) we are talking about subjective assessments, (2) most subjective assessors do not have access to a wide selection of speakers on hand and (3) there is rarely any blinded or controlled testing.

Despite those observations about the AHB2s with the MA Silvers in my CT room, they have served well with every speaker I have connected to them in my NY room, all of which have been significantly more expensive than the MAs. Of course, there wasn't any blinded or controlled testing involved.
You found it less satisfactory in a “more modest system”. I wonder if you’d have liked it with Avantgarde speakers.
It would be a huge revelation and surprise if I liked them with the Avantgardes since, in my various random exposures to those speakers, I have not cared for them at all. None of those exposures have been recent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hear Here

Hear Here

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2020
444
221
50
Portsmouth, UK
It would be a huge revelation and surprise if I liked them with the Avantgardes since, in my various random exposures to those speakers, I have not cared for them at all. None of those exposures have been recent.
Kal - The Avantgarde sound is obviously not to you taste and I fully accept this. Your fellow reviewers (or predecessor reviewers) banded together in 2000 and decided to pick as joint Best Loudspeakers of the Year the Avantgarde Uno ($11-13K) and the Dynaudio Evidence ($85K).

It wasn't this award that prompted me to buy the Unos, but Robert's excellent description of the type of sound he so much liked in the Unos. At the time, I had recently replaced my rather nice KEF Reference 107s with ATC Active 50s that I'd been lusting over for years, but when I owned a pair (bought direct from ATC) I was pleased with the general sound but just wanted to push them 20 feet further away from me - they were far too much "in yer face" for enjoyable / comfortable listening.

Robert’s review described such a different sound that I dashed round to AG's only London dealer and listened for 15 minutes in their dismal small basement demo room. This convinced me that they would offer the sort of exciting sound that Robert had so precisely described. I bought them and later (after that London dealer lost its dealership) became the unofficial Avantgarde London demonstrator - powered by Art Audio. At a Heathrow Audio Show, many visitors considered our sound (Art Audio plus my Unos) the best sound in show - surpassing Avantgarde’s own room with their Duos and AG solid state electronics that were uncomfortable in the hotel’s modest-sized rooms.

Certainly AG speakers need to be carefully matched with amplifier and that’s why I bought or borrowed a dozen before settling on the NAD Master series. The GamuT D200 was a close second but it was uncivilised with high efficiency speakers – scary thump when switched on or off. Even though I’ve upped my speakers to the Duo XDs, I have no wish to improve upon the modest M33 – but I’m always looking for something even better! Peter
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Rubinson

PGA

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2013
79
26
248
Just to pile on, I also believe the ABH2s are the best amplifiers I’ve owned. My list includes mono blocks from Levinson, NRG Control, Cello, Pass, MSB, Spectral and most recently the Constellation Centaur mono. The Benchmark have the slam of a big 500 watt mono, the detail of the Spectral, the warmth of the class A NRGs and Pass. These Benchmark amps are absolutely spectacular. Zero noise, zero distortion, smooth as silk, powerful bass, stunning midrange and treble.

I’m using 4 ABH2s in a biamp system now, but I also used a single pair in bridged mono powering my TAD R1 speakers, and that also was very impressive.

I had been wanting to biamp my TADs for years and finally got around to it this year. I’ve been very fortunate to develop a relationship with Andrew Jones over the years. Andrew designed the TADs. He was incredibly helpful setting up a Pass XVR1 as an active crossover for my speakers as well as on providing input on the overall system design.

The Constellation amps are great, but they are very expensive and four of them would take more space and generate more heat than I wanted. So I started looking at the ABH2s. What finally got me to pull the trigger was when I learned that Andrew’s twin brother had participated in the design of the ABH2s. Not to mention that Centaur amps are 10x the price.

I expected a correctly biamped TAD would offer significant improvements. That said, when I simply swapped two ABH2s for the Centaur monos with the stock TADs I was at best hoping that I would not miss the more expensive Constellation amps. But to my surprise even in a stock TAD setup, the ABH2s for me sounded better than the 10x cost Constellation, which now is 2nd on my long list of best sounding amps.
 

Hear Here

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2020
444
221
50
Portsmouth, UK
I also believe the ABH2s are the best amplifiers I’ve owned. My list includes mono blocks from Levinson, NRG Control, Cello, Pass, MSB, Spectral and most recently the Constellation Centaur mono.
Interesting isn't it that you really like this amp (and many others do too) but I was so disappointed, as are others too. I spent a long time listening to a dozen ss amps after I decided to switch from tube SETs that I'd been using the previous 15 years or so. I bought 6 amps over an 18 month period and borrowed another 6. These included Class A (Accuphase, Sugden, etc), AB (GamuT, Micromega, Mark Levinson, etc) and Class D (Devialet, NAD, etc), all powering my high sensitivity Avantgarde speakers.

The Benchmark was bought after a fellow AG user on another forum had been singing its praises with his AG Trios. The AHB2 was then a recently introduced amp, so no useful reviews and the dealer was hundreds of miles away. I just bought it on the rash assumption that if it sounded so good with his Trios, it should also be good with my Unos. Trouble is (and I learned this much later) my "advisor" was obsessed with noise with his 107 dB speakers and he found that the AHB2 was the quietest amp he's ever owned. Well, yes it is quiet, but after using it for a few weeks, I concluded it was just dull compared with others I was trying - and my old 845 SET monos. It was an amp I wanted to turn down the volume, rather than turn it up. This is the kiss of death as far as I'm concerned, so I returned it (after 3 months) to the dealer who offered a full-value credit. The Sugden and Quad were also dull (even more so) and some of the other amps I tried were less than thrilling. I most liked the GamuT and NAD, though the ML was good too. I was really hoping the AHB2 would be to my liking as it has some great features, specially its easily-adjustable gain setting, shared with the Accurphase - and the GamuT, though this required the top panel to be removed first!

The Benchmark is relatively low cost, so if you need to bi-amp (or quad-amp), it must be a good choice if it suits your speakers, listening preference and maybe room - as it obviously does for you. :)
 

PGA

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2013
79
26
248
An AHB2 is going to sound very different from a SET tube amplifier given the difference in power, distortion and noise. This is almost like comparing a vodka to a scotch. My TAD R1s I think sound best with a very clean signal, which the AHB2s provide. As they say, mileage may vary!
 
  • Like
Reactions: kswanson27

Kal Rubinson

Well-Known Member
May 5, 2010
2,144
468
520
NYC/CT
www.stereophile.com
An AHB2 is going to sound very different from a SET tube amplifier given the difference in power, distortion and noise. This is almost like comparing a vodka to a scotch. My TAD R1s I think sound best with a very clean signal, which the AHB2s provide.
Yes but it is more than the issue of the AHB2 sounding very different from a SET tube amplifier. It is that the people who choose SET tube amps and the speakers that work best with them have different overall sound preferences from those who choose significantly different speakers, such as your TADs.
 

Hear Here

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2020
444
221
50
Portsmouth, UK
Yes but it is more than the issue of the AHB2 sounding very different from a SET tube amplifier. It is that the people who choose SET tube amps and the speakers that work best with them have different overall sound preferences from those who choose significantly different speakers, such as your TADs.
Basically I'd agree with both Kal and PGA. I went to horns more by accident than concious design. I didn't like the ATC 50 Active speakers compaed with my earier KEF Reference 107s and by chance I read that Stereophile had chosen the Avantgarde Uno as their Speaker of the Year. Once I bought them, I learnet that many horn owner used SETs so I bought amps from Art Audio, Graaf and Consonance over 15 years or so. It was only more recently, after making a positive decision to move from SETs to ss that I started searching for any ss amp that offered the enjoyment factor that SETs had been offering. I had no desire to match the sound of SETs but more to find an amp that offered similar excitement when listening to music. Some were good in this respect but others disappointed. Sadly (specially as I'd actually bought it new and I loved its features) the Benchmark fell into this group as did a couple of others - Sugden Masterclass series and Quad Platinum. On switching back to SETs after a couple of years with ss for comparison purposes, I've decided the quest to find a good ss amp was worthwhile and I don't hanker after SET sound. All I'd say is that anyone considering the Benchmark should try in their own system before committing to buy.
 

nc42acc

Member Sponsor
Nov 10, 2015
609
39
140
North Carolina
I am intrigued by this Benchmark amplifier. If I may oversimplify it’s design it appears to be a traditional Class AB amp using a SMPS and a unique feedback circuit Benchmark calls Feed Forward Error Correction? The members who have this amp or have used it in their systems how does it compare to classic Class AB designs and modern Class D like the Purifi? Is it load sensitive why some people have different results? Thanks.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing