Opus is spot on.
Couple of things on filters(analog)
1.one cannot be dogmatic.filter or no filter.there is a vast difference amongst each implementation.order, freq,how and where is implemented.
2.having a converter converting native freq samples,in freq ranging from 44.1 to 384 is quite tricky regarding designing a filter
3.filterless is somewhat non existent,even a gray area if you ask me.parasitic capacitances,analog stages etc present high frequency roll off,which act like,well,filters.unwanted but still..
In the Kassandra,the IV transformer is tuned so combined with the analog stages presents filter properties.freq,slope and intrusiveness is part of the recipe.
Couple of things on filters(analog)
1.one cannot be dogmatic.filter or no filter.there is a vast difference amongst each implementation.order, freq,how and where is implemented.
2.having a converter converting native freq samples,in freq ranging from 44.1 to 384 is quite tricky regarding designing a filter
3.filterless is somewhat non existent,even a gray area if you ask me.parasitic capacitances,analog stages etc present high frequency roll off,which act like,well,filters.unwanted but still..
In the Kassandra,the IV transformer is tuned so combined with the analog stages presents filter properties.freq,slope and intrusiveness is part of the recipe.