Cable? You mean the ones I have that don't have boxes attached??
yes...life is like a box of chocolates....
Cable? You mean the ones I have that don't have boxes attached??
yes...life is like a box of chocolates....
Hey, I contacted Brad a few weeks ago and told him I'd be taking delivery of the Alexia's, but I get no response. Guess he's a busy man!
well I will let you know how the boxes work out for me. Valhalla for speaker wire is a poor choice for SS amps. As such, my 4 meter run is going up on the block. High inductance cable means weak mid bass and way too forward (not bright) treble. My Siltech LS-188 G6 cable is back in holding me over until the MA-X SHD arrives. After removing Nordost, the mid bass came back and the treble extension took a step back where it is suppose to be.
Bruce,
Great thread.
I don't understand why other members of our "friendly community of enthusiasts" would want to post negative comments about your new speakers.
Hey Bruce,
I've got a new pair of Found-Music cables I just started breaking in but I'm already mighty impressed. I'd be glad to bring them by for an audition.
Bruce, congrats on the new speakers. The new silk dome tweets in the Wilson's are superb and IMO long, long overdue. I was listening to my speakers tonight and I cannot believe how great silk domes are. Any current Wilson owner who has the old Focal tweets needs to get a listen to the new tweets as fast as they can. Problem is there would be a flood on the market with the old designs
BTW, I don't agree with Christian, the silk domes work like a charm with Nordost, why- because Nordost is very fast and highly detailed..a perfect match for a silk dome speaker, IMHO. Not such a good match for the old tweet, which has again IMHO, a tendency to stridency and a forward sound. (like Christian is complaining of, but he is laying the blame at the cables, when IMO it needs to be at the old Focal tweet:b)
Dave,
The new Wilson speakers risk to create the generic myth of silk dome tweeters being better per se. Silk dome tweeters have existed since long and we have great silk dome tweeters, average and poor ones since decades. IMHO the new tweeters of the Wilsons and the Aida have a different tonal balance, that allows us to explore new synergies and easily get a better overall system. But used with appropriate cables, electronics and rooms the old speakers still sound excellent. When comparing the Alexia's with the Sasha's people focus on the new tweeter, but they forget it is a completely new speaker, with all new units and a new crossover.
I agree with you, that when wrongly matched the old tweeter could have a tendency to stridency and a forward sound. This only meant that you needed a better cook (and may be better additional ingredients) to prepare the meal. I have listened times enough to the X2 sounding great to understand why many people will keep their old speakers and forget about the new one. Yes, once you get used to some of these new soft dome tweeters you will not want to go back. But IMHO we should avoid crude generalizations stating that silk domes sound better than other types of tweeters.
BTW, I don't agree with Christian, the silk domes work like a charm with Nordost, why- because Nordost is very fast and highly detailed..a perfect match for a silk dome speaker, IMHO. Not such a good match for the old tweet, which has again IMHO, a tendency to stridency and a forward sound. (like Christian is complaining of, but he is laying the blame at the cables, when IMO it needs to be at the old Focal tweet:b)
there is a gentle downward tilt of the highend of about 5-6dB from 1k - 20k
You'll have to remember the Alexia is a new design from the ground up. Not only new tweeter, but the same mid-range as the XLF and new woofers. As the video shows, the crossover was painstakenly tweeked to closely match the XLF as possible.
Did a quick measurement last night and there is a gentle downward tilt of the highend of about 5-6dB from 1k - 20k
Damn these are sounding good!
Dave,
The new Wilson speakers risk to create the generic myth of silk dome tweeters being better per se. Silk dome tweeters have existed since long and we have great silk dome tweeters, average and poor ones since decades. IMHO the new tweeters of the Wilsons and the Aida have a different tonal balance, that allows us to explore new synergies and easily get a better overall system. But used with appropriate cables, electronics and rooms the old speakers still sound excellent. When comparing the Alexia's with the Sasha's people focus on the new tweeter, but they forget it is a completely new speaker, with all new units and a new crossover.
I agree with you, that when wrongly matched the old tweeter could have a tendency to stridency and a forward sound. This only meant that you needed a better cook (and may be better additional ingredients) to prepare the meal. I have listened times enough to the X2 sounding great to understand why many people will keep their old speakers and forget about the new one. Yes, once you get used to some of these new soft dome tweeters you will not want to go back. But IMHO we should avoid crude generalizations stating that silk domes sound better than other types of tweeters.
| Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |