Why don’t Roon makes another version of the software stripped of most of the unused features and mainly focused on sound quality and reliability, let’s call it an audiophile version. I’m sure they have the resources for it. Food for thought?
The answer to this question, I believe, is quite simple.
Roon was developed around two main ideas:
- Efficient library management
- An audio transfer protocol, RAAT, which allows, among other things, easy integration with a veriety of hardware.
Its library management is simply the best around.
I’m not talking about ergonomics, which is subjective. I mean its ability to identify, name, and link pieces of music together.
I have around 7,000 classical music albums, almost all perfectly identified without me having to do anything.
Among these albums, for example, I have 43 different interpretations of
Suite No. 1 in G major BWV 1007 by Johann Sebastian Bach. All these tracks are perfectly identified, and
linked together, despite the files often being poorly tagged. No other library manager does this.
Beyond this small example, Roon offers all the features and functionalities we all are familiar with.
RAAT, which made Roon successful, filled a technological gap. It is one of Roon's backbones.
Such software is large and complex, meaning it's power hungry and therefor generates noise.
So, it is far from being something audiophile (low noise).
Quite the opposite of XDMS.
An audiophile version of Roon will never see the light of day simply because it is outside their core business scope.
But...
We now have the Taiko Extreme and Taiko Olympus!
Each in their own business bracket, offer the possibility of using Roon with audiophile sound quality.
- The Taiko Extreme via USB has little competition.
- The Taiko Olympus I/O XDMI has no competition (except perhaps the Wadax Reference…).
Conclusion: You already have an audiophile version of Roon ;-)
Cheers,
Thomas