The desire result is to get less vibration. I don’t think it is comparing apples with oranges. But that’s your opinion
.
In my opinion, the same as comparing superchargers with turbos when the desire result is to get more horse power.
Tang
I tend to agree with this. Active and passive platforms attempt to solve the same problem of vibration management, but they approach it from different directions. It is like comparing direct drive turntable systems to belt drive systems with massive platters. The goal is accurate and consistent speed. Audiophiles compare different design approaches all the time. SS and tube amps also.
The fascinating question for me is this: Can Tango's custom Stacore rack be also considered in the same discussion with active and passive supports? After all, he and Christian are trying to solve the same problem of providing the best platform on which to place the American Sound AS2000. It is the same problem, but our two members are attempting to solve it from two radically different directions. They will surely be compared, though perhaps not directly.
Consider BD, DD or Idler drive / horns, cones, panels. Are these not all basically different approaches to solving the same problem? Sure, apples, oranges and bananas are all different types of fruit, but they can all be eaten to provide sustenance.
To point out the differences between approaches is missing the point. The point is that different approaches can be used to address the same problem. They can then be compared to determine which is the better solution in a particular set of conditions. And in Marc's case, it is what type of platform sounds best under his equipment in his room.