Review: The laden 'Man of Steel' doesn't soar

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
By JAKE COYLE | Associated Press

It has been a black eye to Hollywood that throughout this, the unending and increasingly repetitive age of the superhero blockbuster, the comics' most iconic son has eluded its grasp like a bird or, if you will, a plane.
New hopes of box-office riches and franchise serials rests on Zac Snyder's 3-D "Man of Steel," the latest attempt to put Superman back into flight. But Snyder's joyless film, laden as if composed of the stuff of its hero's metallic nickname, has nothing soaring about it.
Flying men in capes is grave business in Snyder's solemn Superman. "Man of Steel," an origin tale of the DC Comics hero, goes more than two hours before the slightest joke or smirk.
This is not your Superman of red tights, phone booth changes, or fortresses of solitude, but one of Christ imagery, Krypton politics and spaceships. Who would want to have fun at the movies, anyway, when you could instead be taught a lesson about identity from a guy who can shoot laser beams out of his eyes?
"Man of Steel" opens with the pains of childbirth, as Lara Lor-Van (Ayelet Zurer) and husband Jor-El (Russell Crowe) see the birth of Kal-El, the first naturally born child in years on Krypton. The planet — a giant bronze ball of pewter, as far as I can tell — is in apocalyptic tumult (the disaster film has gone intergalactic), and General Zod (Michael Shannon) attempts to take over power, fighting in bulky costumes with Jor-El.
His coup is thwarted (though not before killing Jor-El, who continues on in the film in an Obi-Won-like presence), and he and his followers are locked away, frozen until Krypton's implosion frees them. Baby Kal-El has been rocketed away with Krypton's precious Codex, an energy-radiating skull.
Kal-El rockets to Earth, setting up not a Midwest reprieve to the lengthy Krypton fallout, but a flash-forward to more explosions. Our next glimpse of Kal-El is as a young adult Clark Kent (the beefy Brit Henry Cavill) aboard a fishing vessel on stormy seas, where he — shirtless and aflame — saves the crew of a burning oil rig.
At this point, your Codex may be spinning. Working from a script by "Blade" scribe David S. Goyer and a story by Goyer and "Dark Knight" director Christopher Nolan, Snyder has clearly sought to avoid some of the expected plot lines and rhythms of the familiar Superman tale. There's a constant urge to push the story to greater scale — a desperate propulsion that will surely excite some fans but tire others.
The film hops back and forth from Clark's grown-up life and his Smallville, Kansas, upbringing with Jonathan (Kevin Costner) and Martha Kent (Diane Lane). Costner, back among the corn stalks, makes the strongest impression of the cast as a severe father urging Kent to hide his gifts.
We're meanwhile introduced to Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Lois Lane (Amy Adams), fresh off a stint embedded with the military for the Daily Planet. Adams, as she usually does, helps animate the film, as she plunges into a bulldog investigating of Clark and spars with her editor (Laurence Fishburne).
Snyder brings to the film a sure hand for overly dramatic compositions that take after comic strip panels. He has a clearly sincere reverence for the source material (originally created in 1938 by writer Jerry Siegel and artist Joe Shuster). He's a filmmaker who, even with his last film, the abysmal "Sucker Punch," seems to precisely make the movie he intended.
Eager fans will likely thrall to the film's many overlong action set pieces, as Superman battles with Zod and his minions. There's little creativity to the fight sequences, though, which plow across countless building facades. Much of New York is, of course, laid to rubble, presumably a contractually obligated element at this point.
But Snyder doesn't have the material or the inclination to make "Man of Steel" as thought-provoking as Nolan's "Dark Knight" trilogy. Superman wrestles with his allegiance to humans or his home planet, but the quandaries of a super-powered man betwixt worlds doesn't have any real resonance. The gravity that cloaks "Man of Steel" is merely an en vogue costume.
While Snyder has succeeded in turning out a Superman that isn't silly (not a small feat) and will likely lay enough of a bedrock for further sequels, it's a missed opportunity — particularly with a bright cast of Shannon, Adams and Lane — for a more fun-loving spirit.
Cavill's performance is less memorable for his introspective brooding than for his six-pack (a fetish for Snyder, the director of "300"). He's handsome and capable, but one can't help missing Christopher Reeve's twinkle. At least he smiled.
The awkward acrobatics to modernize "Man of Steel" are most evident with its new explanation of Superman's shield. The "S," we are told, doesn't stand for Superman, but is a Krypton glyph meaning hope. But if "S'' doesn't stand for "Superman," ''Man of Steel" is the one with the identity issues — not to mention a spelling problem.
"Man of Steel," a Warner Bros. release, is rated PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi violence, action and destruction, and for some language. Running time: 144 minutes. Two stars out of four.
 

Phelonious Ponk

New Member
Jun 30, 2010
8,677
23
0
I saw this with my son Sunday night. I couldn't disagree more with this review. I think, by finally taking the fantasy seriously, by skipping the camp and the easy humor and giving the story some weight and the character some complexity, this Man of Steel's origin story takes flight, even above its origins in the comics. The rest of the TV and movies? This one blows them away. It's so easy to render Superman in simplistic 2-D, it has been done so consistently for decades, that my son and I expected to be entertained with something on a par with maybe Thor. What we got was easily the equal of Batman Begins, the first of the best trilogy in this genre.

Highly recommended for all fans of superhero comic movies rising above cartoons.

Tim
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,238
81
1,725
New York City
I saw this with my son Sunday night. I couldn't disagree more with this review. I think, by finally taking the fantasy seriously, by skipping the camp and the easy humor and giving the story some weight and the character some complexity, this Man of Steel's origin story takes flight, even above its origins in the comics. The rest of the TV and movies? This one blows them away. It's so easy to render Superman in simplistic 2-D, it has been done so consistently for decades, that my son and I expected to be entertained with something on a par with maybe Thor. What we got was easily the equal of Batman Begins, the first of the best trilogy in this genre.

Highly recommended for all fans of superhero comic movies rising above cartoons.

Tim

Will wonders never cease :) Tim and I agree on this. :) Superman has come a long way from up, up and away!

I did see it in 3D on the last big and single screen theater in the city (The Ziegfield) and thought though it sucked. Added little to the enjoyment or perception of the movie. Not that I have liked 3D on any other movie either. Seems to be a big gimmick so the theaters can charge $17.50.
 

Phelonious Ponk

New Member
Jun 30, 2010
8,677
23
0
Will wonders never cease :) Tim and I agree on this. :) Superman has come a long way from up, up and away!

I did see it in 3D on the last big and single screen theater in the city (The Ziegfield) and thought though it sucked. Added little to the enjoyment or perception of the movie. Not that I have liked 3D on any other movie either. Seems to be a big gimmick so the theaters can charge $17.50.

We agree again, Myles. I saw it in glorious 2-D, quite deliberately. I'm not a fan of 3-D.

Tim
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,238
81
1,725
New York City
According to MAD magazine, the "S" stands for "schmuck" :)

Yeah and they called 2001 A Space Odyssey "201 Minutes of a Space Idiocy."
 

Phelonious Ponk

New Member
Jun 30, 2010
8,677
23
0
Yes and they referred to the heroic king in Lord of the Rings as Arrowroot, Son of Arrowshirt.

Tim
 

cjfrbw

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
3,361
1,355
1,730
Pleasanton, CA
I am a child, I love 3D.
 

JackD201

WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
12,319
1,429
1,820
Manila, Philippines
I like TODAY's 3-D, I hated the 70's tech and the movies too.
 

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
saw the film this afternoon and gave it a 7/10

As someone said, Superman has indeed grown up in this film

Story was quite interesting as they used flashbacks to chronicle the early life of Clark Kent

However at almost 2 1/2 hours the film is at least 20 minutes too long. The computer graphics were exceptional however, as my wife uttered, "if I see one more building or bridge collapse"....

TBH after seeing the film and seeing just too much computer graphics I felt that I would have been overwhelmed had I seen it in 3D.

I thought the 2 last lines in the film were tongue in cheek as Clark arrives for his first day of work at The Daily Planet

Lois: "welcome to the Planet"

Clark: "good to be here"

The End

Worth seeing but too long and too heavy on computer graphics
 

jazdoc

Member Sponsor
Aug 7, 2010
3,328
737
1,700
Bellevue
Saw this last night in 2-D...Awesome potential wasted by poor editing...this could have been a great film.
 

KeithR

VIP/Donor
May 7, 2010
5,174
2,864
1,898
Encino, CA
Everyone says the last 45 minutes suck and are way overblown.

I gave up on superhero movies after Batman Rises Again- it feels good. All the movies are the same now with just bigger and badder graphics. Kinda like The Hobbit which I finally watched this past weekend--that movie seriously was in need of a real editor. Almost laughably bad when the first 45 minutes consisted of an unimportant dinner scene.

*read all the books years ago and am a huge fantasy fan
 

JackD201

WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
12,319
1,429
1,820
Manila, Philippines
MOS has broken all Philippine Box Office records. I've yet to see it. The folks at WB Philippines must be smiling ear to wallet. :)
 

Jazzhead

VIP/Donor
Aug 26, 2012
1,466
108
985
One action sequence too many ... but otherwise a treat ... luved it , luved it ... wowww !!! .. whens the sequel due ??
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing