That's what makes these kinds of lists so hard. And what makes talking about these kinds of lists so much fun when you include beer and trash talking! In other words, what criteria do we use to evaluate an athlete?But in the end, I'm also talking about whose the greatest athlete, physical talent and what they did in their sport. In other words, we're also talking about natural genetic talent.
As a parallel, what if we start a thread about the 10 greatest albums of all time? Is there any question that we'd all use some of the same criteria but also use different as well?
For me, someone like Al Oerter is arguably the best athlete of all time. The only four time gold medalist -56-60-64-68 in Olympic history in the shot put. Pyros Dimas almost did it in Olympic weightlifting with three gold and a bronze as did Suleymanoglu of Turkey. Suleymanoglu probably was the worlds strongest, most explosive athletes who at 5 ft tall and around 130 pounds, clean and jerked 3X his body weight, a record that stands today. Everyone made fun of Alexeyev's stomach at the '76 Olympics but the man was an incredible athlete too who at 300 lbs had a 44 inch vertical jump (most NBA players top out in the high 30s-with the best I think being David Thompson at around 41 inches). The man was a freak of nature.
One other thing about Oerter - he did it without the benefit of modern technology, be it a computerized brakedown of his motion, a theoretical optimal motion, or training/diet regimens.
If were talkin' Olympics, one has to consider that fish, errr, Michael Phelps. Most gold medals. Greatest swimmer of all time.