My visit the last three days to Marty confirms yet again – – although no confirmation was required – – that one's listening room is by far the most important component of the sound and the realism one achieves in this hobby.
It is not possible to rate one's favorite room without considering the system in it. It is not possible to rate one's favorite system without considering the room in which it is located.
Speakers/systems just move air a room and air movement in each room is unique. Air if very sensitive stuff I learned that air is very sensitive after working with Frank Tchang from ASI with his tiny resonators that have an effect of air movement in a room. I never thought about it prior.
For example, Don has some of my favorite components: Magnepan MG20.7s, custom woofer columns, REL subwoofers, Aesthetix, Audio Research and VTL tube electronics. It is one of my favorite systems (i.e., collections of components).
Is it one of my favorite rooms + systems of all time? No. But if we put Don's system in one of my favorite rooms of all time, then would I have one of my favorite rooms + systems of all time? Yes.
For example, Don has some of my favorite components: Magnepan MG20.7s, custom woofer columns, REL subwoofers, Aesthetix, Audio Research and VTL tube electronics. It is one of my favorite systems (i.e., collections of components).
Is it one of my favorite rooms + systems of all time? No. But if we put Don's system in one of my favorite rooms of all time, then would I have one of my favorite rooms + systems of all time? Yes.
I have many of my favorite components. But I have realized over time how my dedicated space – – which is not a custom-built room – – has compromised the sound of my system.
Is my own room + system one of my five (5) favorite private rooms + systems of all time? I'm not sure. I will have to go through the list and assess. . .
Let me issue a disclaimer: I believe I have a tendency to be over-enthusiastic about an obviously impressive and realistic-sounding room + system immediately after I experience it.
More sober and considered thoughts in the cold light of day may follow.
Another perplexing situation to evaluate: David Karmeli's Bionor/Lamm system. David Karmeli's system may achieve the greatest suspension of disbelief for the reproduction of the sound of a piano, and for the creation of the sensation of a life jazz club, that I have ever heard. Does this alone justify assessment as one of my favorite "rooms + systems of all time"?
But I think David's giant loudspeakers are too close together. (I believe David agrees that in a perfect world his listening room would be 35 or 40 feet wide, so the huge Bionors could be more than just a few feet apart.)
In a perfect world David's system probably should be in a room that is 40 feet wide and 60 feet long.
Yet I don't think I ultimately could be completely happy with David's system. I would have a nagging feeling that there is something missing in terms of depth and in terms of oomphy reproduction of the lowest frequencies and the reproduction of "air" and sound-staging ambience from the highest frequencies.
I would put it in the next five, along with David Karmeli's
room + system and Steve's room + system and Jim Yager's room + system and Don's room + system.
For example, Don has some of my favorite components: Magnepan MG20.7s, custom woofer columns, REL subwoofers, Aesthetix, Audio Research and VTL tube electronics. It is one of my favorite systems (i.e., collections of components).
Is it one of my favorite rooms + systems of all time? No. But if we put Don's system in one of my favorite rooms of all time, then would I have one of my favorite rooms + systems of all time? Yes.
Another perplexing situation to evaluate: David Karmeli's Bionor/Lamm system. David Karmeli's system may achieve the greatest suspension of disbelief for the reproduction of the sound of a piano, and for the creation of the sensation of a life jazz club, that I have ever heard. Does this alone justify assessment as one of my favorite "rooms + systems of all time"?
But I think David's giant loudspeakers are too close together. (I believe David agrees that in a perfect world his listening room would be 35 or 40 feet wide, so the huge Bionors could be more than just a few feet apart.)
In a perfect world David's system probably should be in a room that is 40 feet wide and 60 feet long.
Yet I don't think I ultimately could be completely happy with David's system. I would have a nagging feeling that there is something missing in terms of depth and in terms of oomphy reproduction of the lowest frequencies and the reproduction of "air" and sound-staging ambience from the highest frequencies.
Bad Speakers need magical rooms , to get good sound. A bad room for audio only takes away it doesn't add quality. A quality system will still shine just less so want to know how good and or bad , take them out of the room, outside ..!
Please kindly be careful not to mis-quote me in terms of singular favorite or singular best rooms + systems. I am being careful to talk about groups or tiers of rooms + systems.
I do not believe in the "one best" or single favorite concept in a subjective hobby such as this.
